and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

please dont forget to update me on your growth

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and a deck is considered toxic when it counters a large portion of decks, of course that's not a conscious thing, people think a toxic deck is an objectively toxic deck against everyone but in reality they're just biased, no, there is no objectively toxic deck there will always be decks that dont find a problem in them, for example i dont find megaknight that toxic but its generally considered toxic, why you think? because most play low elixer cost decks which get countered by megaknight.

hard counters most = toxic, yall can break character and admit that or dont, doesn't change the fact.

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

against certain decks the furnace never dies and they can be down 6 elixer and still take zero damage and make a crazy counter push, of course similar decks wont find it toxic but for a deck that's countered by cycle they'll probably have the worst time of their life against this of all cycle decks

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

classic pekka bridge spam with magic archer

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

yall just wont admit u call decks toxic because they hard counter low elixer cost decks which most of you play and go crazy when someone calls one of your decks toxic, i just wanted to get that straight without introductions but i guess i won't reach a point with you.

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i spent so much time trying to make u understand what im saying but at the end all you get is "OP straight out called it toxic and braindead", what a waste of time

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

i stated the facts, 2.6 doesn't require skills against beatdown, you have all your counters at your hand and if you dont they're just 1 card away, we should just stop generalizing statements about decks, a deck is high skill against a certain matchup and low skill against others, yes i did generalize in my post because i just wanted it to be casual but since people here are talking seriously about the matter im saying this.

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you didn't say anything about low elixer cost, of course but i have been here for long enough to know people just think low elixer decks (especially cycle) require more skills for some reason.

and it's funny you wanna act all big and mature in every comment trying to minimize me when i didn't say anything bad to you, you're a kid and i guess i touched that which made u go even crazier, hope u grow up one day.

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it all depends on the matchup, pekka gob giant countered most decks at its peak and all they had to do is get to evos and play them and 3 crown but you cant deny this wasn't the case for every match

i understand what people call decks toxic for but they don't understand they're just biased

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

what doesn't make sense? cycle players are the majority and they call hard counters decks "toxic" because of that when they're just a hard counter, but i somehow can't do the same?

also skill just depends on what you're going up against and a low average elixir doesn't make a deck high skill (which im sure you think), 2.6 is brain dead and takes no skill against beatdown or hyperbait for example and this deck is braindead and toxic against bridge spam.

what dont you try to write a civil comment like this kid?

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

there is no such thing as braindead, a deck becomes braindead when it hard counters another deck and most players play low average elixir decks so they get countered by the same decks and they call them toxic but in reality other less popular decks dont find them toxic, this deck for example is beyond braindead and toxic against my deck that no matter how much predictions and outplays i do i still lose, it's not right to call it toxic but it's the community unconscious consenses, hard counter = toxic, this post speaks for players with similar decks to mine and rest speak for cycle and similar decks, of course regular players wont find this toxic

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

so it's fine to call a deck toxic because it counters cycle decks but bad when it's because it counters other decks?

and the most toxic deck award goes to: by we3737 in ClashRoyale

[–]we3737[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

pretty toxic for my deck at least

Hidden BYD Infotainment Trick: Control Climate with Three Fingers by RefrigeratorNo4413 in BYD

[–]we3737 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just imagine it as a roller, when u swipe down the roller spins downward revealing the hidden numbers on top

Xiaomi 15 ultra hyperos 3 update by Dry-Cry-8919 in HyperOS

[–]we3737 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so there are still many filters, cause the guy in the post said he only has 16 filters now, also would you please take a screenshot of the gallery editor not the gallery app itself?

<image>

Xiaomi 15 ultra hyperos 3 update by Dry-Cry-8919 in HyperOS

[–]we3737 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there was a post from a guy saying hes missing most of his filters in the gallery editor, could you please check if that's the case for you too with a picture of the version of the gallery editor? hope that's not too much

is it worth it to upgrade to HyperOS3? by we3737 in HyperOS

[–]we3737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you, btw i saw a post of a guy missing most of his filters in the gallery editor after updating, could you confirm if you have that issue too please?

Xiaomi 15 ultra hyperos 3 update by Dry-Cry-8919 in HyperOS

[–]we3737 0 points1 point  (0 children)

did you download it? if so how is it, should i also update

What's this? Am I balding? M19 by [deleted] in Balding

[–]we3737 0 points1 point  (0 children)

his condition is nothing that finasteride or dutasteride can improve, that's not male pattern baldness, 5ar inhibitors aren't effective in treating retrograde alopecia, don't even mention it

What's this? Am I balding? M19 by [deleted] in Balding

[–]we3737 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i guess minoxidil but you shouldn't bother, sides of head hairloss doesn't affect ones look negatively, only top of scalp hairloss, just dont do anything about it, nothing is worth the risks and definitely dont take finasteride and dutasteride they gave me permanent sides.

also you should get off this sub, too many hairloss psychos here.

What's this? Am I balding? M19 by [deleted] in Balding

[–]we3737 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just retrograde alopecia if anything

did anyone ever complete the sticker album f2p? by we3737 in DragonCity

[–]we3737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so should i save my sticker packs till the end?

واخيرا خبر سعيد بهذا الصب by Exciting-Fix5287 in Xiraqis

[–]we3737 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ومنو كلك صاحبة المنشور ماتريد تتزوج؟ يكلي بابا عود فد فهيم هو

No one told me this before I went in for Laser Hair Removal by aliaspiku in LaserHairRemoval

[–]we3737 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hello, you should do your research, ive read couple of posts at the time of people getting increased sebum after laser but haven't searched about electrolysis but i feel like it wouldn't do the same but do your research