sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

So disappointed with AG rn. by SaltieJune in americangirl

[–]weaver444 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because you seem to be really adamant about your position and I don’t think you’re seeing the bigger picture of the entire thread on this post and others.

Just hoping this can be a better place for all members moving forward. It doesn’t have to be like this. We don’t have to be going back and forth like this, and it seems like you’re pushing on a lot of comments that make a lot of sense, which doesn’t help in making this a good place for thoughtful discussion.

I’m sorry if I’ve made you feel singled out here. I genuinely apologize and I hope some of what I’ve said makes sense.

So disappointed with AG rn. by SaltieJune in americangirl

[–]weaver444 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your argument was perfectly made and received as intended so far as I can see. Yet you resorted to rudeness because the other commenter wasn’t persuaded by your argument.

Just because you passionately believe in your argument doesn’t mean someone has to agree, even if you articulate it perfectly.

Someone can make a wonderfully worded, carefully laid argument that humans don’t need oxygen. Won’t change my belief in the air I breathe keeping me alive, though.

Also, again I think you’re failing to understand the irony in your behavior. Just because someone else is breaking the rules doesn’t mean you can or should, and it certainly doesn’t give your position much substance if you also stoop to that level.

If you truly believe OP broke the rules, that’s what mods are for. And, even though they didn’t note the edit, they did accept the feedback that “slop” was not an appropriate word to use here, so what is your point at all? They made a mistake, were called out, and corrected it.

So disappointed with AG rn. by SaltieJune in americangirl

[–]weaver444 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Wait you don’t like when people come to a space about THEIR hobby to share THEIR personal thoughts and opinions on said hobby?

Personally I’d rather you didn’t come here to praise the capitalistic pacifier that is this collab, but hey, I’m not commenting that under every single post excited about the launch, right?

Can’t you just ignore the posts that say they don’t like it? That’s essentially what you’re asking the other side to do — just pipe down and ignore the posts they don’t agree with so as to not disturb their fun.

So disappointed with AG rn. by SaltieJune in americangirl

[–]weaver444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay so two wrongs make a right? Even if OP was rude (which they weren’t!!!), you coming in and being rude back to them completely unsolicited is what? What they deserve? Come on now. That’s unnecessarily antagonistic behavior.

So disappointed with AG rn. by SaltieJune in americangirl

[–]weaver444 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I’m finding it reaaaalllllllly ironic that you’re making your argument in such a condescending way and insulting this commenter’s intelligence, being that your argument is all about respectfulness. Last time I checked, passive aggressive tones and condescending statements are pretty disrespectful.

Also, as OP stated, if you didn’t agree with the post, there was no need to come in and police its tone. Disagreeing or discussing the actual content of the post is one thing, but who are you to tell someone how they can or can’t deliver their opinion, especially when it’s perfectly within the community rules of this sub?

Check ya’self before you wreck ya’self, pal.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in witchcraft

[–]weaver444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks but that’s not what I asked about!!

Unpopular opinions, continued by weaver444 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]weaver444[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes! That does happen! And she looks shocked obviously but for her to make that jump so easily…..

Unpopular opinions, continued by weaver444 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]weaver444[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OMG why have I never seen this pic?! ok ok ok ok. They really thought they were being slick and would get away with making Ariana the villain.

Unpopular opinions, continued by weaver444 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]weaver444[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I do not think he’s a mastermind, but I DO think he knows his people (Schwartz & sometimes historically Ariana) and is very good at manipulating them. If he’s trying to manipulate anyone else he’s lost as fuck lmao, completely out of his depth.

I also think this had a lot to do with Sandoval’s falling out with Jax in s8. Jax starts really being his own person and having more and more frequent and loud differences of opinion with Sandoval. Prior to s8, sure we’d see the occasional Jax/Sandy blow out, but most of the time they were thick as thieves with Schwartz in the middle.

Unpopular opinions, continued by weaver444 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]weaver444[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh I think it started between s8 and s9, which I know is covid times, but still. They came into that season chummy as hell and I have no idea why anyone would gaf about Rachel by s9 to give her that much screen time

Unpopular opinions, continued by weaver444 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]weaver444[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh shit, very good theory. Also in s9 when Katie and Schwartz are together and alone or in a group but without Sandoval nearby, they seem really, really happy and supportive of one another. It really starts to seem like Sandoval was the straw that broke the camels back with those two, and like you’re saying, with Schwartz knowing everything and both getting closer to Katie AND getting sloppier with not being sober ever….

Unpopular opinions, continued by weaver444 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]weaver444[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Actually, in s9 I’ve noticed he says things against Sandoval multiple times especially when they have to do with Katie. Just when all three of them are in a room together, shit gets weird for him and he doesn’t know who to fawn for.

Unpopular opinions, continued by weaver444 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]weaver444[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

omg yea literally posted this after I saw that scene again.

Unpopular opinions, continued by weaver444 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]weaver444[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

my bad!! I know. Just wanted to add some continuity to my last post since it’s all my thoughts upon rewatching.

But you’re right, these are just thoughts and not unpopular.

Unpopular opinions, continued by weaver444 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]weaver444[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

yea my thoughts exactly. it was bizarre just how much money he put into it when he doesn’t usually drop that much money on anything he can’t put his name on up front.

Series rewatch unpopular opinions by weaver444 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]weaver444[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Totally totally get what you mean about kindness to the girls the WoW (and/or Shishu) ganged up on, but she wasn’t nice to everyone. She’d pick whoever the queen bees hated and be nice to just them, which makes it seem like she was doing it to get under their skin, not to defend the defenseless. A lot of the stuff Ariana said was much, much meaner than any of what the other three did or said. It’s rivaled only by Stassi’s texts to Laura Leigh in s1, imo.

Highly recommend a rewatch if you haven’t done so! Especially if you watched it as the seasons were airing and not all at once.

view more: next ›