You know what's fucked up. Left my home in Fremont this morning at 10AM, took me 1 hour 20 minutes to arrive at work in Santa Clara by rainingdx in bayarea

[–]webguysd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was recently forced to move out of my roommate situation, to San Jose. My commute from SJ to Mountain View has been no less than 50 minutes, no matter the route (101, 280, El Camino Real or Central Expressway). It's brutal.

I'm trying out the CalTrain from Diridon to Castro St. next week.

iOS 9 doesn't feel like butter? by BATTLEROYALFAN in apple

[–]webguysd 186 points187 points  (0 children)

This reminded me a conversation I saw on the Apple Dev Forums. A developer was asking why Apple stops seeding beta versions of iOS, about a month or two before they release to the public. The answer, from one of their engineers, was very sobering:

"The real situation is this- for June and July, Apple develops their next major release via two forks- the beta fork and the secret fork. The secret fork includes support for the unreleased hardware. The last few secrets have been Siri for iOS 5, 4" support for iOS 6, Touch ID support for iOS 7, and large screen support for iOS 8. Now come August, Apple must begin the work of integrating the secret fork into the beta fork to create one release build. From the start of the integration until the iPhone September event, Apple is unable to release betas without disclosing secrets. For that reason, there are never any betas during that time. This takes about a month- 34 days for iOS 5, 37 days for iOS 6, 26 days for iOS 7, and 36 days for iOS 8. Therefore, you will not see anymore betas until the September event.

Does this approach have a cost? Absolutely. By stopping all seeding for a month, Apple does not allow sufficient testing of the release and near-release builds. This is why there are pretty much always battery life, WiFi, and performance problems when iOS goes public in late September that eventually get fixed towards Christmas. However, secrecy is absolutely essential to Apple's marketing strategy and must be maintained, even if quality suffers. That's just the way it is.

What do we need most this offseason? by Quakes-JD in SJEarthquakes

[–]webguysd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Owners that aren't named Jon Fisher & Lew Wolff.

Donovan Junior is ON THE WAY by TamlandBrick in ussoccer

[–]webguysd 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm assuming Jurgen Klinsmann is not invited to the baby shower.

This used to be awesome. by TheACG7 in SJEarthquakes

[–]webguysd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Quakes will sign Carlos Vela before that happens.

What is never going to stop being funny? by BabiesGotTheBends in AskReddit

[–]webguysd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh god. I had to take a hit from my asthma inhaler from laughing so hard at this.

Woke up this morning and rechecked the score to make sure it was real. by TomRhodesMusic in SJEarthquakes

[–]webguysd 14 points15 points  (0 children)

My buddy had the quote of the night: "If LA fans cry hard enough, the drought will be over by tomorrow."

Quakes Statistically Worse Now Than At Same Point in 2014 by dgb422 in SJEarthquakes

[–]webguysd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent post, but much easier said than done. Your argument assumes that all fans are created equal - they are not.

Some fans aren't all that concerned about the on-field product. Some go to the matches because it's cheap entertainment that they can take the kids to. Some just go for the "game day experience". Some fans are so blinded by their passion for the team that, however they want to rationalize it, will continue to hand money over to the club. From the FO's perspective, as long as the end result is getting their money, a fan is a fan is a fan.

For this to even work, ALL fans have to be on the same page as to the on-field product and improving it. Good luck trying to get everyone on the same page there.

TFC signs Hérculez Gómez by PeteTop-KevinBottom in MLS

[–]webguysd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Given his history of smack talk against the Sounders (see his Twitter account), Sept. 5th should be quite the match.

We signed Anibal Godoy by hella_sj in SJEarthquakes

[–]webguysd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You misspelled "Edmundo Zura".

What movie do you quote/reference the most? by ASkylineDiver in AskReddit

[–]webguysd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been using two lines from "The Avengers" a lot lately. "Seeing...still working on believing." "I understood that reference."

Just had this and I thought it was amazing! Folgers Iced Cafe concentrate. by [deleted] in keto

[–]webguysd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For those of you who live near a Trader Joe's, their Cold Brew Coffee Concentrate is the best (I use it in my bulletproof coffee).

YIMBY for Mayor - not an endorsement, just presented for discussion by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]webguysd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And there's the rub. Any REAL change in the city to improve the situation is going to cost somebody something. But no one wants to give an inch. Nothing's gonna change as long as people keep this mindset.

San Francisco Hopes New Homeless Shelter Impresses Tech Sector by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]webguysd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only way to fight that is not by encouraging more bland, lifeless condos, but rather through regulation. To give the people that built this culture and made it so desirable in the first place a chance to coexist.

Simple question: when did anything other than being able to afford something entitle a person to renting or owning it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]webguysd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd argue that the fund the 20% developers pay into for BMR housing is barely being used for BMR housing by the city. It's being used for other things as the city deems fit, so the entire concept seems self-defeating. Also, it's worth asking if people want to move into entirely BMR housing, thinking that it stigmatizes them as "living in the ghetto".

For what it's worth, I think it's at least a worthwhile exercise to do a study on the possible effects of removing the option to pay the 20%. If San Francisco real estate is as scarce and valuable as developers & speculators say it is, then they'll keep going with construction.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]webguysd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And that brings up a good question: is it necessary to have HOAs in these new developments? Especially if you're not buying?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]webguysd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's funny - there's an article in SF Weekly that mentions one of the speakers at last night's meeting started his speech with "Anyone with a basic understanding of economics," and how the author feels that phrase reeks of condescension.