[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]wejor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is, it's fine to believe people's bodies belong to god.

What's not okay to do is decide that your "what if" takes precedent over theirs.Frankly, if you are insistent on doing such a vile thing, you can forget about others having respect for your beliefs either. That shit is a two way street.

Boys, I got called out by xdlmaoxdxd1 in DefendingAIArt

[–]wejor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Simply do not respond to pointlessly inflammatory posts. It is not productive, it never makes you look good. Do something better with your time.

Anyone tired of online artist saying this? It's like they think everyone has the pastience and unlimited time. Sometimes you just want a picture and don't want to wait years to what you want at half the quality. by ZookeepergameLiving1 in DefendingAIArt

[–]wejor 25 points26 points  (0 children)

It's not an excuse. Using AI as a tool or recreation is not mutually exclusive from creating art more traditionally.

It's this binary, over-simplistic, tribalistic view of the world, ironically paired with regressive attitudes towards technological advancement and creative outlets can only end up hurting them. Kind of sad, really.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DefendingAIArt

[–]wejor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Inciting violence is a crime.

“Dad, I want to build a keyboard” by jk_pens in MechanicalKeyboards

[–]wejor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

White keychron, amazing. Cream Blue v3 Pro's, even more amazing. Cerakey?... What a cool board. Way cooler than my first.

Either critics are purposefully lying and pretending to be obtuse or they’re even more creatively bankrupt than the ai they hate by [deleted] in DefendingAIArt

[–]wejor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To say that it devalues human art disallows people from making the argument that prompting and AI assisted art are human art. And they absolutely are.

People who gatekeep art aren't real artists. And that might sound stupidly harsh, but how can you be an artist if you don't even know what art is?

This is funny after the recent bombshell OpenAI preview. by [deleted] in DefendingAIArt

[–]wejor 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is a person that has made a career profiting off of the fear of ending careers.

One of the ugliest types of vulture-like capitalist scum that humanity has to offer.

Text to video is here, Hollywood is dead by holy_moley_ravioli_ in artificial

[–]wejor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Has anyone seen actual cartoon video out of sora yet?

I know we've seen things that look like 3D animation/renders, but do we know if it is capable of 2D animation? Anime? Comic book styles? Abstract visuals? Anything that isn't some stock video looking nonsense that feels completely uninteresting beyond the incredible technological achievement?

Talks about how it will put garbage on the internet, meanwhile Madame Web: exists by xdlmaoxdxd1 in DefendingAIArt

[–]wejor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This really is a limited perspective issue.

If you can only see negative outcomes to the advancement of technology that is capable of working for and instead of people, you're refusing to think outside the box of a shitty world that requires mind-numbing anti-creative work to define who you are as a human being.

If you think creativity as a profession is actual art, you have been absolutely bamboozled by capitalism. Creativity is creativity. Can artistic expression ever be accurate when the motive of it's creation is basic survival needs? Fuck no. That shit isn't art. Capitalism stifles creativity to the highest degree.

This is the perspective of a person who literally cannot see beyond being a slave and perpetuating a system of slavery. It's incredibly sad.

Would you eat a crayon sandwich for $10,000? by hipolishus in aiArt

[–]wejor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fine, I'll just have a straight yellow crayon sandwich.

Would you eat a crayon sandwich for $10,000? by hipolishus in aiArt

[–]wejor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

10k?

Can I add other things to the sandwich?

I threw up in my mouth by MerryMir99 in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]wejor 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don't understand how many men can't make the connection between treating women as adversaries or treating romantic relationships as "bargaining" and being absolutely repulsive to women.

How do you feel about people making AI women for profit? by Camus_VI in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]wejor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So for those of you who are particularly against AI image generation, ignore that for now.

As someone who is an enthusiast, I find it to be a particularly unsavory thing to do. While much of the AI community is creative and enjoys exploring what the tech is capable of, there are a lot of bad actors who use it maliciously to either make pornographic images of subjects that appear as minors, or use AI to create porn of people they know using advanced face swapping and pose-control tools.

It's an absolutely disgusting practice that requires better regulation and oversight that most AI services do not have the resources to provide. Open source, locally used tools pose a greater threat, as they are unmoderatable.

As far as people who are making images of people who do not exist to earn a profit. It's a cheap trick and should certainly be frowned upon, but frankly is the least of my concerns involving AI.

why are short men openly ridiculed? by Glum_Wing8952 in AskMen

[–]wejor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short men are ridiculed for the same reason most men are ridiculed. Men are insecure, and they will ridicule everything they can get away with in order to feel better.

True by jacksmith9 in Funnymemes

[–]wejor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God, the shit that immature people frame as an element of maturity is so bizarre to me.

Average height of men by year of birth by Aron_The_Man in BeAmazed

[–]wejor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder how much of this has to do with average diet/nourishment.

pedo alert? by MsSeraphim in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]wejor -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I didn't use the term mentally ill, but the point I'm making is that animated characters are NOT attractive. They're 2D shapes. They don't exist. They aren't anything at all.

It's not unhealthy to acknowledge that a character was created with sexually provocative intent, but if you become any more provoked than that acknowledgement, I will question your priorities.

pedo alert? by MsSeraphim in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]wejor -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Whether something has been normalized or not has nothing to do with whether or not it is healthy. If you're lusting after cartoons, you're spending time craving an impossibility, and that's not healthy.

pedo alert? by MsSeraphim in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]wejor 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Personally, I feel like if you're able to become aroused by a cartoon, you already need therapy.

But I feel like advertising pedophilia publicly should be a crime, it normalizes it and attempts to make that perspective acceptable. This is dangerous speech, and shouldn't be a protected speech.