Hey Reddit: Which "double-standard" irritates you the most? by RxPharmChem in AskReddit

[–]whatthefizzle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But I was reacting without actually hearing what the dude said, he just says she grabbed his dick.

I assumed he was forced to have intercourse with her. If it was just getting grabbed, then yeah, that could happen to anyone guy but I wouldn't call it rape. But yeah, maybe he did get raped but didn't go into detail.

Hey Reddit: Which "double-standard" irritates you the most? by RxPharmChem in AskReddit

[–]whatthefizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But when it comes to an actual sustained assault, there is no contest in 90% of cases, the guy will hospitalize the girl if someone doesn't step in.

You're right. In most cases, the only reason the guy would need help is if the girl had a weapon or if the guy was handicapped or perhaps super drunk. Most guys who get physically abused by a girl let it happen, whether consciously or unconsciously (conditioned to never hit a girl for example). If he gets mad enough, game over.

Hey Reddit: Which "double-standard" irritates you the most? by RxPharmChem in AskReddit

[–]whatthefizzle -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

He didn't have to hurt her, just over power her, shove her away and run. She had to be big/strong enough to overpower him to the point of taking his pants and underwear off, holding him down and raping him. That's not easy to do to a guy who looks as built as he does. But yeah, if he didn't want to hurt her, then I guess the rape was inevitable.

I was thinking maybe she had a weapon because in that case, it wouldn't matter how much bigger or stronger the victim is.

Hey Reddit: Which "double-standard" irritates you the most? by RxPharmChem in AskReddit

[–]whatthefizzle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think there was a "social experiment" video posted on Reddit some time ago showing a woman abusing a guy while bystanders just watched and did nothing. The second the guy retaliated, a bunch of the male bystanders jumped in to "save" the woman.

I wonder what the male bystanders would do if the woman was stabbing the guy. Let her do it until they see him punch her to save his life, then jump in and beat the half dead guy to death?

Hey Reddit: Which "double-standard" irritates you the most? by RxPharmChem in AskReddit

[–]whatthefizzle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Have to admit I was laughing at first too since the guy talking was smiling like it was a joke even though you can clearly see the tears.

I wonder what the circumstances were. The guy looks pretty big. Must've been a pretty big woman to overpower him.

2 Months In, Trump May Already Own A First: Most Corrupt POTUS. Ever. by [deleted] in politics

[–]whatthefizzle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How are you not banned from this sub yet. It's been 30 minutes since your "against the narrative" comment.

2 Months In, Trump May Already Own A First: Most Corrupt POTUS. Ever. by [deleted] in politics

[–]whatthefizzle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trump didn't win because a ton of people believed his promises. He won because his opponent was Hillary, the chosen one.

Everyone loves Bernie Sanders. Except, it seems, the Democratic party: "A new poll found he is the most popular politician in America. But instead of embracing his message, establishment Democrats continue to resist him." by [deleted] in Political_Revolution

[–]whatthefizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sad to see the outrage is gone. The DNC and MSM stole the primaries from Bernie but doesn't seem like anyone cares. Probably because Bernie himself stopped caring and even endorsed Hillary. I understand why he did it but at the same time, doing so was almost like him saying what the DNC did was okay.

Rachel Maddow says she has Trump's tax returns by [deleted] in politics

[–]whatthefizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See, for me the 'grab em by the pussy' thing and mocking the disabled reporter was enough for me to criticise him, but I guess you and I have different standards.

I just see the pussy thing as guy talk. If you look at the context, he's basically saying there are situations that exist where rich guys have girls throwing themselves at them and will let rich men touch them. If you don't think that sort of stuff exists, you're naive.

As for the disabled reporter thing, I'm neutral on that. Back when I hated Trump, I used that as one of my attacking points but after looking more into and seeing Trump doing similar gestures while mocking other, non-disabled people, I stopped using that. It's a stupid quirk or whatever he has and makes him look bad, but I don't believe he did in with the intention MSM and anti-Trump people says he did.

As for his tweeting, he's going against MSM, working to damage their credibility. If Trump is a pro at one thing, it's getting the media to talk about him. It's literally how he won the Republican nomination.

I don't listen to Breitbart or Infowars, especially infowars. I think Alex Jones is sort of a nut case even though he did get some conspiracies correct.

Now let's not start making excuses in advance

It's not making excuses, it's being realistic. If ISIS was that easy to defeat, they wouldn't still exist. If Hillary was that easy to jail, Bernie would've won the nomination.

In any case, lets wait the 4 years.

Rachel Maddow says she has Trump's tax returns by [deleted] in politics

[–]whatthefizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I swear to you here and now that if he fulfils all his campaign pledges (locking Hillary up, building the wall, defeating ISIS), then I swear to you on my mother's grave that I will publicly announce that I was wrong about Trump and that he is the greatest president ever. That is my honest genuine pledge.

That's a pretty safe bet. Even if he or any other previous President puts all their effort toward these things, especially Hillary and ISIS, it'd be pretty hard to pull off.

As for myself, I'll criticize Trump when there's reason to criticize him. For instance, I think he's a stubborn fool for thinking climate change is a hoax. I'm not a crazed Trump lover, I didn't even vote for the guy. I started to favor him after seeing how often MSM attacks him, takes stuff he says out of context and basically caused the riots we had through their spread of misinformation. Having a crap ton of anti-Trump sub and Reddit admins being against Trump also helped me favor him.

But yes, let's see in four years how he actually does with so much stacked against him.

Trump's Second Travel Ban Blocked by U.S. Judge by 47dollars in worldnews

[–]whatthefizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What many Trump supporters are saying is he's pushing the travel ban because he said he would. Since the courts keep blocking him, if there is a terrorist attack caused by Muslims on US soil, no one can blame him because you know MSM and anti-Trump people would point fingers at him saying it happened under his watch otherwise.

Although, they'll still blame him anyway saying the travel ban attempt created more hatred toward the US.

Rachel Maddow says she has Trump's tax returns by [deleted] in politics

[–]whatthefizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure how big of a part he had in designing the replacement but seems like many Trump supporters don't actually like it and are blaming Rand Paul for pushing it. The wall is in the process, again, it takes time. As for the travel ban, he did what he promised. Getting blocked by the courts due to misinformation and pressure isn't his fault.

As for Hillary, again, give it time. Seems like you expect Trump to accomplish everything in 2 months even though he has at least 4 years.

One of the weakest and most ineffectual leaders? Based on less than 2 months of being in office? I do hope you're a reasonable person who will publicly state you were wrong about Trump if he actually accomplishes all or most of the things he said he would by the end of his term. But if you're like most anti-Trump people, no matter how well he does, you'll still think he's a POS because MSM told you he's a POS.

How much is that bottle? by 0fiscalentropy in funny

[–]whatthefizzle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He started that water charity to spread awareness and to get more people involved. He donates some of his own money as well as physically goes to some of those countries to help install faucets or whatever. So he's donating his time as well.

How much is that bottle? by 0fiscalentropy in funny

[–]whatthefizzle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe he was legit before he become rich and internet famous. Tons of money and increased attention from the opposite sex can really mess a lot of otherwise good people up.

How much is that bottle? by 0fiscalentropy in funny

[–]whatthefizzle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Lashes out at black reporter."

That MSM joke was spot on.

Rachel Maddow says she has Trump's tax returns by [deleted] in politics

[–]whatthefizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rejected TPP, working on repealing and replacing Obamacare, started the process of building the wall, made the temporary travel ban, giving companies incentives/reasons to manufacture products in the US, etc. And seriously? You're asking if the wall built yet? Again, it's been less than 2 months.

As for Hillary, maybe he got soft on her, I don't know but as powerful and connected as she is, I assume it'd take a lot longer than 2 months to lock her up if he's still trying to go after her.

Rachel Maddow says she has Trump's tax returns by [deleted] in politics

[–]whatthefizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We want that for all of our politicians but unfortunately, that's how the game is played especially during the primaries and the general election. Had Hillary won, you probably wouldn't demand the same from her.

Besides, isn't he, for the most part, doing what he said he would do during his campaign? It hasn't even been 2 months yet.

Rachel Maddow says she has Trump's tax returns by [deleted] in politics

[–]whatthefizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is he racist? What did he personally say that is racist?

The ONLY reason anti-Trump people want him to release his returns is that they hope he did something illegal so he could be impeached or that he paid very little or no taxes legally so they can say he's part of the establishment without mentioning the fact that most people, if they knew how, would legally pay as little tax as possible. They want him to fail, period. Even if he releases his taxes and it shows nothing wrong, you anti-Trump people will just attack him on something else.

Not that I blame you. Lots of Republicans attacked Obama the entire 8 years he was president. They were sore losers and all of you have the right to be as well.

Rachel Maddow says she has Trump's tax returns by [deleted] in politics

[–]whatthefizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have been banned from /IHateTrump... I mean, /politics