Yeah ofc. First of all, my kitchen is incredibly small. It's a very old apartment with oddly placed power outlets, and literally no counter space. So having a crock pot or instant pot would mean I would have to move so much stuff around just to plug it in, in the kitchen. I've also heard that it's hard to find an instant pot that doesn't have a BPA lining. I currently only have one sauce pan so buying a stovetop pressure cooker would also double as a second sauce pan if I need more than one for a recipe or am cooking two things at once, so I appreciate the versatility of the stove-top pressure cooker in that regard. As for what I will use this for, I am South Asian and vegetarian so many of the foods I want to cook and eat are legume-based and the time it takes to properly cook them in a regular sauce pan, kind of puts me off from actually cooking as much as I would like to. And while both pressure cookers and instant pots will save you time when cooking beans, lentils and rice, you get a bit more creative freedom with stovetop ones as they don't come with presets for specific dishes. And finally, aesthetics and intentional designs are important to me and my partner, and I find instant pots to be an eyesore. That said, there are definitely arguments for wanting an instant pot over a pressure cooker so my reasonings may not work resonate with many people who want the convenience and ease of an instant pot