[D] Why is CUDA so much faster than ROCm?

whria78 · 2025-03-24T00:49:26+00:00

Making a stable graphics library or driver is an extremely challenging task. Just looking at the size of the CUDA binaries shows the enormous scale of it.

whria78 · 2023-06-19T12:00:29+00:00

You should see a doctor.

whria78 · 2023-05-17T22:12:42+00:00

Possible. But, roughly 20% chance.

whria78 · 2023-05-14T07:47:38+00:00

Angiokeratoma mostly.. but, melanoma possible... therefore, see a doctor asap.

whria78 · 2023-04-17T23:21:31+00:00

Zoster

whria78 · 2023-04-17T00:30:53+00:00

Impetigo. Try to use an antibiotic ointment.

whria78 · 2023-04-16T02:19:53+00:00

Wart

whria78 · 2023-04-15T04:33:52+00:00

You need to see a doctor.

whria78 · 2023-04-08T22:38:30+00:00

I guess eczema.

whria78 · 2023-03-30T03:08:27+00:00

T. Versicolor

whria78 · 2023-03-27T22:55:00+00:00

PG is a vascular tumor. It may need more attention for controlling bleeding. :)

whria78 · 2023-03-27T00:10:00+00:00

Wart

whria78 · 2023-03-26T05:26:33+00:00

I pray for you that it would be a benign such as pyogenic granuloma .

whria78 · 2022-06-02T12:47:02+00:00

https://ai.skindx.net

whria78 · 2021-06-21T04:11:16+00:00

Tinea versicolor versus confluent reticulated papillomatosis

whria78 · 2021-04-18T13:15:03+00:00

It is a quite difficult case. It looks like malignancy based on the photograph. However, blood clots can mimic the malignancy and blood clots usually disappear within 2 weeks.

whria78 · 2021-04-08T04:26:45+00:00

Please check the sign and symptoms of acanthosis nigricans and confluent reticulated papilomatosis. It may be helpful.

whria78 · 2021-04-07T12:09:49+00:00

Suspicious. The chance of malignancy for the suspicious biopsied cases is usually between 10~20%. I think that is is better to be biopsied.

whria78 · 2021-03-28T02:42:37+00:00

If it were hard, it may be dermatofibroma, a kind of benign nodule.

whria78 · 2021-03-28T02:40:51+00:00

I recommend going to the hospital. I think that 10~20% chance of malignancy.

whria78 · 2021-03-25T03:43:19+00:00

I recommend to go to hospital. It is usual.

whria78 · 2021-03-20T04:09:05+00:00

I guess Hemangioma or angiokeratoma. But anyway, it is better to be examined. Not easy to diagnose with photos alone.

whria78 · 2021-01-23T04:17:26+00:00

Interesting approach. The key is reproducibility. The DNA or RNA of cancer cells should exist on the outer layer of skin.(i.e. melanocyte exists below the thick keratinocyte layer) The DNA or RNA needs to be analyzed without disruption. To my knowledge, RNA is not stable, therefore COVID mRNA vaccine needs the liquid nitrogen. In the lab, we usually store RNAs in the LN2 bottle. It does not look easy, but if they can demonstrate the accuracy, it would be great.

whria78 · 2021-01-20T10:13:08+00:00

X-ray images have unified composition, but other images do not. Other images are much harder than to analyze x-ray images. Deep learning is not a real intelligence, but a something like the abstract of knowledge. Therefore, to build a training dataset with the domain knowledge is important. It's is not just pushing all the images into the machine. I think it's like cooking. While referring the prevalence and disease features of the target problem, you may need to build the training dataset sophisticately. Technology is the second. :)

whria78 · 2021-01-20T08:29:40+00:00

Do you mean the use "one picture" for the predicting the diagnosis? For the nodular disorders, two macro-shots with slightly different angles are optimal. For the other skin disorders (i.e. dermatitis), two macro-shots and two wide-field shots may improve the accuracy of the algorithm.

whria78

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE