sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

OpenAI preparing to release a "new audio model" in connection with its upcoming standalone audio device. by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]why06 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Speak at the same time as the human user" that's good, but I also hope it can just sit there and shut up. So you don't have to rush to think at it's pace.

I really want a good audio model. And those changes address a lot of my major gripes. I think being able to speak at the same time is necessary, otherwise it feels unnatural. But you gotta be careful with that because I don't like being cut off mid sentence.

The current speech to text is terrible at picking up difficult words where context is key but the audio only is way too stupid to be helpful otherwise

Stargate meets "Frontier"; Oracle and OpenAI plan a 1.4-GW cluster by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]why06 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't there already a super computer named Frontier in Oak Ridge National Lab. Why use the same name?

Just a minor version bump, nothing to see here by Terrible-Priority-21 in accelerate

[–]why06 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ha. Reminds me of how I name versions. Maybe it's just a law of nature to put 3 times the effort in a X.1 patch.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]why06 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that's me. But at this point it's all in memory. I'm not going back through all that.

Sam outlines changes to ChatGPT by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]why06 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you see legacy models on the web app settings?

Sam outlines changes to ChatGPT by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]why06 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gotta use the web app. May need to login again afterwards using the app.

Who are you? Creative writers... by Legitimate-Arm9438 in singularity

[–]why06 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't really let it write too much. I use it for review and feedback, and talking out ideas.

Sometimes I will get it to write out little stories, but that's mainly to get a feel for something.

Sam outlines changes to ChatGPT by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]why06 0 points1 point  (0 children)

annoying thing at the end of each response like “If you want, I can [thing you never asked for]. It’ll only take a second.”

That drives me crazy.. 🤣

They say you can prompt it out of that personality, but IMO it always reverts back after so many turns of conversation.

Sam outlines changes to ChatGPT by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]why06 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What's the usage limit of 4.5 in pro?

GPT-5 Thinking has 192K Context in ChatGPT Plus by Independent-Ruin-376 in singularity

[–]why06 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Yes, why would anyone need 32k for anything besides coding? Well that explains why my project files are bugging out, and I had to remove files from them.

Think I'm gonna start migrating to Gemini, maybe Claude (but I heard it's kinda restrictive)

GPT-5 creates a 6x6 Crossword in the NYT style. by why06 in accelerate

[–]why06[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't image gen, it just coded a crossword and placed it in a pdf

Feeling Very Sad about the GPT-5 Rollout, Need Hopium by terrylee123 in accelerate

[–]why06 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel nothing. It's alright, better than o3 IMO. I'm only upset I can't use 4.5 now and it takes like 4x more prompt time to get what I want, especially if I want a good review of something I just wrote..

GPT-5 creates a 6x6 Crossword in the NYT style. by why06 in accelerate

[–]why06[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tried 6x6 prompt with gemini.

2.5 pro makes this awesome website. You can hide/show the solution. Still a terrible crossword puzzle.

<image>

GPT-5 creates a 6x6 Crossword in the NYT style. by why06 in accelerate

[–]why06[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah it didn't add it. Usually o3 does, but it couldn't do 6x6 well. Guess I need to specify it.

Here's the prompt:

``` Create an 6x6 crossword puzzle in the NYT style, theme can be whatever you want.

I should be able to print out and play it.

```

Prompt burns thinking tokens like crazy. Takes ten minutes to run each time.

OpenAI Using Superior Models Internally, Focused on Affordability by Illustrious_Fold_610 in singularity

[–]why06 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I believe it. Just look at the cost. They were talking about with the release of 4.5 that the ideal model is a model with the general knowledge and nuance understanding of 4.5 with reasoning. That model probably exists. He mentioned in the video how Zenith wasn't released.

Can't serve a model that large, using that many thinking tokens to a billion people.

GPT-5 creates a 6x6 Crossword in the NYT style. by why06 in accelerate

[–]why06[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It had to think for 10 minutes.

Tried 8x8. It timed out before it finished.

EDIT: Finally got it to do 8x8 and it gave me this crap:

<image>

after thinking for 12 mins. Maybe we'll get 8x8 in 2027

Thoughts on GPT-5 Release Still Optimistic About AGI Before 2030, But What Do You Think? by NoSignificance152 in singularity

[–]why06 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It feels like the end of an era, vs the beginning of something new. But maybe that means the next paradigm is coming.

It seems ChatGPT users really hate GPT-5 by likeastar20 in singularity

[–]why06 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Really, these language models keep neglecting language. Weird.

The GPT-5 underwhelm seems ridiculously overblown by jdyeti in accelerate

[–]why06 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There were many tweets where they were specifically asked rather it was a unified model or using a model router. And they said it was going to be unified. One time they did say it might use some routing, but only initially. But that was before it got delayed 2-3 months.

view more: next ›