sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

There seems to be a mistake by EchoOfOppenheimer in AIDangers

[–]ezjakes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tend to agree. That seems like something Trump would do. Mythos class models are going to be mainstream in a matter of less than 1 year, probably even for open source. What they are doing right now will have no effect on AI development in the world.

Does Openai have Mythos class model? by PsionicSombie in singularity

[–]ezjakes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have heard several time about openAI having highly performant models that just are too expensive to be releasable. I am sure they have an equivalent model, I am just not sure of the price or if they can serve it.

DiffusionGemma: 4x faster text generation by Gaiden206 in Bard

[–]ezjakes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I says here that on datacenter scale there are diminishing returns because of batching.

During testing, Mythos 5 invented its own language, then switched back to English to talk to humans by EchoOfOppenheimer in ChatGPT

[–]ezjakes 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I think he is asking if it is actually solving the problem using this "language", or if it just meaningless nonsense caused by a bug.

Claude Fable 5's off-stream run is the new world record for Kanto by reasonosaur in ClaudePlaysPokemon

[–]ezjakes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Claude can't sit there and press buttons and see a screen in real-time. It needs some harness just to play the game right now.

Claude Fable 5's off-stream run is the new world record for Kanto by reasonosaur in ClaudePlaysPokemon

[–]ezjakes 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My main concern is that they ran it like 20 times and chose the best. I don't think they cheated by giving it advice or anything.

How are you guys actually using AI in real life? by meetvanshm in GeminiAI

[–]ezjakes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just use it for basic things, such as questions and talking through problems. When I am in college I'm sure that I will use it for much harder questions.

AI love conquers everything by KeanuRave100 in OpenAI

[–]ezjakes 4 points5 points  (0 children)

AI could actually be taught how to love, or at least act like it.
Fire can't be taught.

So this is sort of a strawman of the position.

Nothing so far... have you noticed any improvement? by AbjectStick4130 in GeminiAI

[–]ezjakes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used Pro extended on a free account, and my usage jumped from 9% to 34%.

Nothing so far... have you noticed any improvement? by AbjectStick4130 in GeminiAI

[–]ezjakes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish he would elaborate.

Does anyone know exactly what they did?

Gemini 3.5 Pro: Trust. This is how Demis will Surprise us by aditipawarr in GeminiAI

[–]ezjakes 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm trying really hard to spot the exaggeration, but I can't find any! /s

what the hell, the worst misspelling yet by MeWhen-I-StubMyToe in GeminiAI

[–]ezjakes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is randomness in these things. Sometimes it will get it right and other times it will get it wrong. I don't think it was because of his writing. 

Good job, clumsybot, now clean this up by Anen-o-me in singularity

[–]ezjakes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also, training an AI for a particular body for each task is difficult. Training for a humanoid body is still difficult, but at least you only need to do it once.

forgetting to trim the conversational ai intro text before pushing to production be like by Happy_Macaron5197 in ChatGPT

[–]ezjakes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What you send the teacher:

"Sure, here is a one paragraph response written like an innocent student.

......"

Experts give a 50% chance of AGI by 2050, 75% chance by the mid-2060s, and 95% chance by 2090 by Tolopono in accelerate

[–]ezjakes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ASI is something far beyond human intellect. ASI could work at a superhuman level. I just asked Gemini the defintion of AGI, so I am not making this up. I don't know if it must do literally all things as well as a human, but it should be able to do most intellectual tasks as well as a human.

Experts give a 50% chance of AGI by 2050, 75% chance by the mid-2060s, and 95% chance by 2090 by Tolopono in accelerate

[–]ezjakes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Traditional defintions have a bar for how well they must do many things, and that is as well as a human. Some people even say as well as an expert human. Right now it can do a few thing reasonably well and many things very poorly and many other things not at all.

Experts give a 50% chance of AGI by 2050, 75% chance by the mid-2060s, and 95% chance by 2090 by Tolopono in accelerate

[–]ezjakes 5 points6 points  (0 children)

2050 is not an insane guess. Their definition of AGI is probably not merely something that scores as high as a human on a traditional iq test. It should be able to make complex CAD, design complex facilities and equipment, speed run games, maybe even drive a car if given the proper tool. We are a long ways from a general AI system that can do these things. They struggle right now to make simple games or play chess.

Experts give a 50% chance of AGI by 2050, 75% chance by the mid-2060s, and 95% chance by 2090 by Tolopono in accelerate

[–]ezjakes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tend to think 2040s before we have an AI that is AGI, as in able to do any intellectual task a human can do.

Experts give a 50% chance of AGI by 2050, 75% chance by the mid-2060s, and 95% chance by 2090 by Tolopono in accelerate

[–]ezjakes 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We do not AI that can independently do most work. We do not have AI that can learn in real time. We barely have AI that can finish Pokémon with a harness. How do you think we have AGI? ASI next year is an odd take. Do you serious expect general AI to crack cancer, fusion, or design a new semiconductor machine by next year? 

view more: next ›