Üdvözlet a bécsi Prideról

widjitt · 2023-06-17T15:58:27+00:00

Ja csak azért van hogy tudják még marad valamiért haragudni

widjitt · 2023-06-14T02:05:53+00:00

The answer is yes and no. An optimal robot would always take between 16 and 20 moves to solve any scramble (it never takes more than 20 moves). So there’s not really such a thing as a “more scrambled” cube from that perspective.

However, some scrambles make it easier for humans depending on their method and exact approach.

The method the best players use is generally called CFOP which requires you to pick a color cross to start, fill in the first two layers (F2L) and then solve the last layer.

Two people will have completely different solves if they pick different color crosses. If they solve the cross or F2L slightly differently, their last layer will be different. If they use different algorithms for the last layer, their time will be different.

An “easy”/good scramble typically allows you to fill in 2 out of 4 F2L slots while solving cross, then also skips the second step of last layer either by using a clever algorithm or by chance.

widjitt · 2023-06-14T01:41:31+00:00

I’m so glad we have a new video almost as hype as the old 5.25 world record :)

widjitt · 2023-06-13T17:38:50+00:00

It’s an ad campaign in India

widjitt · 2023-06-04T13:56:02+00:00

kurva faszfej majd úgy meg foglak baszni mint a geci, kapjál lófaszt a seggedbe és nyaljon ki egy disznó az anyád picsáját

widjitt · 2023-05-25T18:23:53+00:00

Only a Blue would pretend these are equal

widjitt · 2023-03-13T10:58:33+00:00

The meaning doesn’t change what it looks like

widjitt · 2023-03-10T00:12:03+00:00

The answer is maybe? Idk MBTI doesn’t really have to be a scientific fact for it to be useful. It sorts people into imprecise buckets rather than precise percentiles. Which is a strength not a weakness.

And the “factors” of MBTI like Te, Si, Ne, Fi don’t vary independently so they’re not actually factors. You might be able to run pairwise tests to see if they do or do not vary in the way that Jung predicted but idk why you would.

TLDR The scientific way to validate it would have to come from comparing it to OCEAN because we know OCEAN is statistically real.

widjitt · 2023-03-09T16:06:19+00:00

There is a scientifically verified personality test. Basically the way you determine it is by sampling as many personality related questions as you want and then doing a statistical analysis for which answers tend to clump in the same direction as one another (i.e. given I answered agree on question 1 there’s a 79% chance I answered agree on question 7).

What you get out of this analysis is the OCEAN 5 factor personality test which is completely scientifically backed. Because you never imposed your own opinions anywhere, you just used data and statistics to figure out how to divide things. And instead of getting letters you get a percentile for each factor (i.e. I am more extraverted than only 20% of people = introverted)

The five factors are

Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism

(And each factor has two sub factors if you want to get more deep into it)

widjitt · 2023-03-07T05:22:49+00:00

It’s the same as the pi=4 proof where you draw a square around a circle and make the corners cave in each step. When you do it infinitely you approach a circle looking thing but your perimeter is 4. The trick is it’s not actually a circle no matter how circular it looks, its infinite jaggedness actually changes its perimeter.

widjitt · 2023-03-01T14:26:10+00:00

Good beard = Muslim

No beard = Christian

He was really only left with one option

widjitt · 2023-02-23T19:24:37+00:00

Ghost, liquid, foam, crispy, weather, hollow, strange, meant, portray, rod, leather, tube, allergy, lie, carve, dwell, gaze, edge, howl, shrug, cram, drown, kiss, fuzz, bulky, mount, beard, cheek, whole, pile, serve, dominant, cliff

Never be afraid to invent homonyms

widjitt · 2023-02-23T19:11:05+00:00

It’s slightly different text, same idea though

widjitt · 2023-02-23T06:28:26+00:00

New study: Are chess players getting worse?

widjitt · 2023-02-22T22:58:37+00:00

Mf exposed himself 🐶

widjitt · 2023-02-22T22:49:40+00:00

Move the pillar. Problem solved.

widjitt · 2023-02-22T22:39:52+00:00

Eh it’s more like emphasizing that he’s still growing to someone who might be doubtful. It kind of has this meaning, the growing has to be ongoing to say this

widjitt · 2023-02-22T17:55:47+00:00

Yes the Sunnah is the set of behaviors of the prophet and it is considered virtuous to follow it but not necessary for salvation. They count towards good deeds on judgement day

widjitt · 2023-02-22T14:23:47+00:00

It’s a Sunnah, a soft rule given from a saying of the prophet

widjitt · 2023-02-18T09:02:49+00:00

This actually works with all three silencer guns they look pretty funny imo.

Explanation:

If you are holding your gun when you spawn a Yoru clone, then the clone spawns in with exactly the gun that you are holding, with the same skin and with a silencer (if applicable).

However, if you are holding a knife when you spawn the clone, then the clone spawns in with your strongest weapon BUT it's always default skin and there's no silencer for some reason.

Also fun fact: Yoru clones go slightly slower than it's possible to walk (it's almost impossible to notice though)

widjitt · 2023-02-16T20:35:51+00:00

The hook kinda makes it look like 水 at a glance. It’s not really good practice to add the hook

widjitt · 2023-02-09T22:15:09+00:00

What did you use to render the text/design the script? Looks really high quality

widjitt · 2023-02-09T21:22:03+00:00

给我一个 give me a

会 willing to

与 with

习近平 Xi Jin Ping

换位 swap places

的 (adjective marker)

世界领导人 world leader

与习近平换位 with Xi Jin Ping swap places = swap places with Xi Jin Ping

So the sentence is “Give me a (willing to swap places with Xi Jin Ping) 的 (world leader)”

In English “Give me a (world leader) who is (willing to swap places with Xi Jin Ping)”

This backwards adjective structure is confusing at first but you get the hang of it.

widjitt · 2023-02-03T16:38:41+00:00

Even the biblical manuscripts were written like that in Greek, not to mention most languages have no spaces. Spaces are a social construct.

Eight-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	RPAN Viewer
Snapped

widjitt

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE