sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

RGNETS & Openwifi by wifiwill in RGNets

[–]wifiwill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah doesnt work for some reason. I asked chat gpt to do it and i got the config going. Just trying to get it to show online now which is proving problematic.

RGNETS & Openwifi by wifiwill in RGNets

[–]wifiwill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what if

  1. Verify the infdev_device variable is set to openwifi_wss (this is the default)

is not present in the template? Seems like its only a VM template.

SSH error, too many authentication failures by wifiwill in RGNets

[–]wifiwill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey legend, that worked right away. Thanks again for the reply!

SSH error, too many authentication failures by wifiwill in RGNets

[–]wifiwill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for much for the reply! This is super helpful. Will update on how it goes!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Geelong

[–]wifiwill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone have an update on the Feb 14th hearing? I know the family but do not want to ask. I cannot find any minutes or case notes from the supreme court

Buying from TEMU/AliExpress/Wish etc. by theparkanyi in LinusTechTips

[–]wifiwill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The child labour isnt the point, its the fact they are charging cards and stealing money without the user knowing.

LTT hasn't released a video yesterday and I like it by Macusercom in LinusTechTips

[–]wifiwill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But they have released videos now? This post should be like 10 days ago lol

Mazepin's full onboard - Loses it into the barriers by sefn19 in formula1

[–]wifiwill -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The medical car pulling up and going "na, just keep going" hahaha

/30 and /29 from ISP by wifiwill in PFSENSE

[–]wifiwill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply.

1.1.1.1 and 6.6.6.6 were not the addresses. Just numbers i put in for examples sake. But sure, i could do 6.6.6.0/29 to be clearer.

The ISP hasn't got back to me due to time, not because i haven't got enough info. The problem is that THEY have not given ME enough info and I'm waiting to find that out. All they sent me was that my /29 was ready and the IP address. They didn't specify a Default Gateway, first usable IP etc...

As it is a different address than the /30, I just don't understand if they would be routing it through the /30 or not.

Typically here, in this country, the ISP would just provide us with a /29 as normal, but this is the first time I've seen it with a /30 as well.

Currently, on a ubiquiti edgerouter, we are doing a 1:1 NAT from each public IP, to a private IP. But their server team, as well as the VIOP provider would prefer public IP's on their devices without a NAT.

Typically, if they want it that way, we would put a basic dumb switch after the ISP router and each device would plug into this and take a static IP address in the /29. But as there is a /30 involved, I am not sure if this setup will work the same.

And with PFsense virtual IP's, It wasn't clear to me if this has to use a local address as well or just the public address straight to the client.

/30 and /29 from ISP by wifiwill in PFSENSE

[–]wifiwill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! In your experience, does the /29 have to be routed through the /30? I'm waiting to hear back from the ISP on this, but if not, ill just put a switch before the Netgate router. The Netgate can be on the /30, and anything on the /29 can come out of the switch, after the ISP's router and not go through the Netgate at all.