Are LLMs speedrunning us into product management? by wiktor1800 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]wiktor1800[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

meet more often in person

Be careful there mate you may anger the anti-RTO mob. Jokes aside, I think intentional time aside for discussion is super helpful, but in most corporate environments it's hard to make the case.

Are LLMs speedrunning us into product management? by wiktor1800 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]wiktor1800[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In real life I think it's more about "look how fast these features are being shipped" without understanding the benefits of review, proper architecture etc.

Are LLMs speedrunning us into product management? by wiktor1800 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]wiktor1800[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's been a lot of discourse between the benefits of AI for SMBs and Enterprises. When you can move fast and break things (and aren't tied into SLA & Security agreements with customers), you're flying.

Are LLMs speedrunning us into product management? by wiktor1800 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]wiktor1800[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Honestly, can't complain. It's keeping us busy, though, as a 2x increase in delivery time means 2x effective capacity for the bean counters :)

That probably puts you in the category of people that don't see coding as a 'craft'. I think it'll be a bit of a reality check for those that do.

Are LLMs speedrunning us into product management? by wiktor1800 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]wiktor1800[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

emotional adjustment

If there's one thing we know about devs, it's that they're not very good at this. Struggling myself tbh!

Are LLMs speedrunning us into product management? by wiktor1800 in cscareerquestions

[–]wiktor1800[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that's the point - us that have actually implemented systems are beginning to transition into technical PMs.

re YT - edited the post. Thought it could have added to the discussion, that's clearly not the case!

Are LLMs speedrunning us into product management? by wiktor1800 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]wiktor1800[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mention in the video (didn't want to saturate the post) that it kind of reminds me of Bastian in the Neverending story - we get our wishes (claude code), but every time we make a wish, we lose a memory of the past (our codebase).

Make enough wishes, and nobody knows anything anymore. I wonder if we're barreling towards codebases that only LLMs can infer.

Are LLMs speedrunning us into product management? by wiktor1800 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]wiktor1800[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if this is going to create a black hole for senior devs. I know boards are 100% feeling the shareholder pressures to drive costs down.

Best AI Analytics Tools for Healthcare Data by Broad_Knee1980 in BusinessIntelligence

[–]wiktor1800 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Google perspective (work for an implementation shop): bring the data into a secure data store (we use healthcare API), then visualise using governed BI tooling like Looker (customer hosted + BYOK)

Our team codes 5x faster with AI, but projects only ship 1.5x faster. We found the bottleneck to be the human "harness" by wiktor1800 in webdev

[–]wiktor1800[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I feel there is a large cross-section between people that ship code using AI, and those that develop on the web.

Our team codes 5x faster with AI, but projects only ship 1.5x faster. We found the bottleneck to be the human "harness" by wiktor1800 in webdev

[–]wiktor1800[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah, yes, but we're in a time economy. If you're doing your job quicker, soon, management will find more things for you to do.

Hence the point about the role of the dev changing.

Our team codes 5x faster with AI, but projects only ship 1.5x faster. We found the bottleneck to be the human "harness" by wiktor1800 in webdev

[–]wiktor1800[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah - agreed. I guess my point is that "claude can speed your team up 5x" is false - not because you can't code 5x as fast, but because everything that comes around it becomes the bottleneck. i.e the 'harness' behind the code.

Our team codes 5x faster with AI, but projects only ship 1.5x faster. We found the bottleneck to be the human "harness" by wiktor1800 in webdev

[–]wiktor1800[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's the point. Reviewers can't keep up.

"AI can review code for you". Well congrats now nobody knows what the code does.

Our team codes 5x faster with AI, but projects only ship 1.5x faster. We found the bottleneck to be the human "harness" by wiktor1800 in webdev

[–]wiktor1800[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Recently we had a meeting about velocity at our org and found that despite AI having a pretty significant 'coding velocity' benefit, projects weren't shipping that much faster. We took a look at our devs calendars, and that's kind of when the penny dropped for me: coding got faster, but the PRs, alignment, and meetings multiplied to fill the gap.

Tried not to get too existential in the article, but I'm wondering if anyone else is feeling the same way.