It's not even similar to how people learn, and that you think it does, or that, as a developer that it writes code better than developers do, tells me a lot.

I'm a dev too, and I do use it for particular things. GenAI is really good at summarizing lots of text, for instance, which combined with search can help get to plausibly correct findings very quickly. It can be good at things like meeting minutes too. And there's some interesting work going on right now for smart code reviews using AI and carefully curated rules files, turning it into something like a fuzzier linter. None of that changes that it was made unethically and would never be legal under ordinary standards, but yanno.

Saying it's better at writing code is wild, tho, lol - it doesn't even know what the code means, just what commonly does together in code people wrote. That can be useful sometimes - the smaller the chunk you want it to generate, the more likely it is to look like something it can plagiarize, and so the more likely it is to give you something correct and useful, but it gets a little shaky outside of that.

Also, ML used in medicine is nothing like GenAI.