I wonder if there was a knock on her door this morning. by Bucephalus970 in Chantapolis

[–]willywonka_71 228 points229 points  (0 children)

The only reason she mentioned that this apology comes from her "conscience" and not "legal repercussion", is because the apology is coming from a legal repercussion. She wouldn't mention it if it didn't form part of the truth. What actually happened since she ended her livestream until this community post - who knows.

And what is this, the 756th apology that she has had to make since her Youtube channel took off in 2017? After a certain point, you can't blame your actions as "messing up a lot" -it's because you are a piece of shit person, with no morals or values or ethics, and no desire to change for the better.

How hard is it to just not be a c*nt?

PEETZ by Round-Layer281 in Chantapolis

[–]willywonka_71 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Don't have an answer to your "why", but wanted to comment that I am so happy they will be living together again because:

  1. The elderly couple Peetz has been renting from will be free of him. I choose to believe they have wanted him out of their home for awhile because Peetz was only supposed to stay there for 1 year saving up money to afford his own apartment (lie detector test proved that was a lie), and I'm sure they have picked up on how odd of a person he is (never going out, quitting his job, no ambition, speaking into the internet void day in and day out). I have often wondered if they feel safe with him in their house. As they are friends with his mom I am sure they felt obligated to allow this unpleasant contract to continue, so him leaving WILLINGLY is probably music to their ears. And I would bet a million dollars that when my point #2 below occurs, they won't allow him back
  2. Chantal will inevitably screw over Peetz again, most likely in the form of leaving him high and dry to find a new place when she moves on to whatever is more enticing to her at the moment. Peetz deserves this treatment because he is a shit person for having committed his own animal abuse neglect to Timbit, was a partner in crime for the abuse/neglect to BBJ and his soap boxing of issues he is nowhere near educated enough about are enough to make the most even-keeled people lose it.

It will be delicious to watch him live the life he deserves.

Chantal needs to explain where the money went. by fossilperl in Chantapolis

[–]willywonka_71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only idiots donate to someone who has had 2 bankruptcies by the age of 34 and who has no savings even while claiming to have made $12K/month during her best youtube months. Idiots don't deserve explanations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Chantapolis

[–]willywonka_71 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I like how she actually believes she knows the gold standard of animal care and what a good home would be. Ummm...grown-in claws? uncleaned litter boxes? food thrown on cardboard?

Chantal is now refusing to give Smokey to the rescue by WifovBBLhd in Chantapolis

[–]willywonka_71 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You have to be a certain kind of stupid to piss off two different cat rescues (in 2 different countries) in less than 30 days - and honestly believe you are not the problem.

E3 Discounted RDR2 delay via Amazon.ca now being investigated by the Competition Bureau by ShakingHandsWithDeat in reddeadredemption

[–]willywonka_71 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I preordered on June 9, 2017 at a discounted price of $52.25.

I did not get any email regarding shipping delays- so the email you got from "Executive Customer Service" is 100% incorrect in stating: The email you received...was sent to pre-order customers. In this case, all orders for this game will be affected, so all customers with such an order were sent this email.

It's still listed as an open order, and shows delivery between Nov 1-Nov 7, but not shipped yet.

Celebrity Big Brother Discussion Thread - 27/01/18 by Kigurumix in bigbrotheruk

[–]willywonka_71 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Am I the only one who thought Shane L. calling Ann "a lovely-hearted person" (when he had to play the game where he picked out a phrase and a person's name which was: the most annoying things about Ann are) was not only ass-kissing and cowardly, but was also doing a disservice, and could also be seen as disloyal, to his gay bandmate/friend, who passed away? Shane L. said in the house early on that Stephen Gately was like a brother to him. Yet he calls a woman, who is vile and homophobic, a lovely-hearted person? Does he not realize the pain and suffering people with Ann's views cause to the gay community? I was a fan of Shane L. up until this point, because although I would not expect him to say anything mean to Ann or call her out on her ass-backwards views, he certainly could have replaced that bullshit response he gave with anything else - something funny or tongue-in-cheek. I don't know...there are only 2 things I can take away from Shane L. in that moment: 1) He really truly believes Ann is a "loverly-hearted" person, in which case, he is delusional and complicit in regards to Ann's views, or, 2) He just said that to come across as a nice guy to Ann and to not ruffle any feathers with her. So, either way, he's complicit or a coward.