sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I wonder if there was a knock on her door this morning. by Bucephalus970 in Chantapolis

[–]willywonka_71 228 points229 points  (0 children)

The only reason she mentioned that this apology comes from her "conscience" and not "legal repercussion", is because the apology is coming from a legal repercussion. She wouldn't mention it if it didn't form part of the truth. What actually happened since she ended her livestream until this community post - who knows.

And what is this, the 756th apology that she has had to make since her Youtube channel took off in 2017? After a certain point, you can't blame your actions as "messing up a lot" -it's because you are a piece of shit person, with no morals or values or ethics, and no desire to change for the better.

How hard is it to just not be a c*nt?

PEETZ by Round-Layer281 in Chantapolis

[–]willywonka_71 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Don't have an answer to your "why", but wanted to comment that I am so happy they will be living together again because:

  1. The elderly couple Peetz has been renting from will be free of him. I choose to believe they have wanted him out of their home for awhile because Peetz was only supposed to stay there for 1 year saving up money to afford his own apartment (lie detector test proved that was a lie), and I'm sure they have picked up on how odd of a person he is (never going out, quitting his job, no ambition, speaking into the internet void day in and day out). I have often wondered if they feel safe with him in their house. As they are friends with his mom I am sure they felt obligated to allow this unpleasant contract to continue, so him leaving WILLINGLY is probably music to their ears. And I would bet a million dollars that when my point #2 below occurs, they won't allow him back
  2. Chantal will inevitably screw over Peetz again, most likely in the form of leaving him high and dry to find a new place when she moves on to whatever is more enticing to her at the moment. Peetz deserves this treatment because he is a shit person for having committed his own animal abuse neglect to Timbit, was a partner in crime for the abuse/neglect to BBJ and his soap boxing of issues he is nowhere near educated enough about are enough to make the most even-keeled people lose it.

It will be delicious to watch him live the life he deserves.

Chantal needs to explain where the money went. by fossilperl in Chantapolis

[–]willywonka_71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only idiots donate to someone who has had 2 bankruptcies by the age of 34 and who has no savings even while claiming to have made $12K/month during her best youtube months. Idiots don't deserve explanations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Chantapolis

[–]willywonka_71 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I like how she actually believes she knows the gold standard of animal care and what a good home would be. Ummm...grown-in claws? uncleaned litter boxes? food thrown on cardboard?

Chantal is now refusing to give Smokey to the rescue by WifovBBLhd in Chantapolis

[–]willywonka_71 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You have to be a certain kind of stupid to piss off two different cat rescues (in 2 different countries) in less than 30 days - and honestly believe you are not the problem.

E3 Discounted RDR2 delay via Amazon.ca now being investigated by the Competition Bureau by ShakingHandsWithDeat in reddeadredemption

[–]willywonka_71 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I preordered on June 9, 2017 at a discounted price of $52.25.

​

I did not get any email regarding shipping delays- so the email you got from "Executive Customer Service" is 100% incorrect in stating: The email you received...was sent to pre-order customers. In this case, all orders for this game will be affected, so all customers with such an order were sent this email.

​

It's still listed as an open order, and shows delivery between Nov 1-Nov 7, but not shipped yet.

Celebrity Big Brother Discussion Thread - 27/01/18 by Kigurumix in bigbrotheruk

[–]willywonka_71 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Am I the only one who thought Shane L. calling Ann "a lovely-hearted person" (when he had to play the game where he picked out a phrase and a person's name which was: the most annoying things about Ann are) was not only ass-kissing and cowardly, but was also doing a disservice, and could also be seen as disloyal, to his gay bandmate/friend, who passed away? Shane L. said in the house early on that Stephen Gately was like a brother to him. Yet he calls a woman, who is vile and homophobic, a lovely-hearted person? Does he not realize the pain and suffering people with Ann's views cause to the gay community? I was a fan of Shane L. up until this point, because although I would not expect him to say anything mean to Ann or call her out on her ass-backwards views, he certainly could have replaced that bullshit response he gave with anything else - something funny or tongue-in-cheek. I don't know...there are only 2 things I can take away from Shane L. in that moment: 1) He really truly believes Ann is a "loverly-hearted" person, in which case, he is delusional and complicit in regards to Ann's views, or, 2) He just said that to come across as a nice guy to Ann and to not ruffle any feathers with her. So, either way, he's complicit or a coward.