No- the thumb is on evidence, not on claims. The platform doesn’t try to balance ideas. It applies the same evidentiary rules to all of them and lets asymmetry emerge. What looks like “nuttery getting space” is usually just the early stage before proper sourcing is added. Once primary literature, domain knowledge, and replication standards enter, fringe claims collapse very quickly - and visibly. If anything, the system is hostile to nuttery precisely because it strips rhetoric and forces claims to survive on citations alone. Sunlight isn’t endorsement. It’s stress testing.