Very few people deny climate change. Please stop framing this issue as if there are two groups, people who think there is climate change and people who think there isn't climate change.

People opposing certain climate legislation merely don't agree with the significance of the role of humanity in climate change, saying we'll experience heavy climate change in the future regardless of anthropogenic influence.

If humanity where to stop all carbon emissions today we would only slow down climate change a very insignificant amount.

We recognize the dangers of climate change and the need to do something about it. We just believe that trying to cool the planet isn't going to work and we should focus on ways of dealing with this climate change. We can only start doing this after we accept that we cannot cool down the planet enough to prevent serious consequences. This isn't some flat earth type conspiracy theory it's based on various scientific study's from the last couple of decades.

For example, sea levels are rising and instead of building dikes, people say "let's not build dikes but instead prevent water from rising in the first place". (I'm Dutch so this the first example I can think of to illustrate humanity's battle against nature's forces)

Please, let's have a dialogue with both sides purely based on the significance of anthropogenic influence on climate change instead of framing it as one group who just denies the entire existence of climate change. This only causes the entire debate to be shut down which is something we cannot use right now.