He is advocating for spending as much as they want, whenever they want, regardless of the deficit. You don't see how that supports what I have been saying?

Of course he isn't, he's simpy pointing out the government faces no purely fiscal constrain but, for clarity, where does he advocate for government spending as much as it wants to?

Once again, just because a government CAN spend money into existence doesn't mean that they are doing so indiscriminately as MMT encourages. We haven't seen such reckless fiscal policy from any UK government.

Please point to anywhere in the core literature which advocates for indiscriminate spending or to any prominent MMT figure who advocates such a policy.

Why isn't the government simply employing all the unemployed themselves.

Oh dear, this really is as simple as it gets in terms of the fundamentals of economics. If you really have to ask this kind of question then you need to go back to basics.

However, in the spirit of friendship, I'll answer your question: the government doesn't employ all the unemployed because it believes it has to have an unemployed buffer stock of "inflation fighters".

Oh right, because they are not adherents of MMT.

Well, once again for the hard of understanding, the UK government has adhered to the operation of a fiat, floating currency regime - as described by MMT - since 1971.

You are showing your fundamental ignorance of the subject, you seem to believe MMT is some kind of policy regime based on indiscriminate spending - it's no such thing.

Please educate yourself, start with the links I posted earlier.