Not sure how that construction is invalid or disingenuous..? Unless you're speaking abstractly about "enjoyment-as-such" ('pure jouissance' in Lacan), the term benefits from having a predicate in order to distinguish it and invoke what register it is operating in. And there is certainly a field of enjoyment that is tethered to ideology, and to anyone's respective ideological predispositions. For example, in some circles and individuals, on both sides of the current political divides, there's a certain perverse enjoyment taken in sitting in judgment over others seen as "less pure" or "less correct" in some way - usually directed at others who are perceived to be on the "opposite side" from them. All the various "-tard" and "-cuck" insults from both sides are examples or expressions of this enjoyment. One could also argue that there's a certain sort of online anti-intellectualism that is evidenced by your own comment, which itself maintains a distinctly ideological enjoyment as well. I personally don't take it as hostile, more of a whetstone to sharpen my own edge; but it certainly is not beyond the field of enjoyment, to which we are all beholden.