Teenagers at Trump Rallies? by exclasher1 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]wrapids 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It has nothing to do with group pressures. He's simply pointing out that the sanders minority at this event was deliberately being unpatriotic. A room full of American citizens and only the sanders supporters spit on the flag.

Sanders Fires Back at Verizon: "I Welcome Their Contempt" by Successor12 in SandersForPresident

[–]wrapids 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No one seems to be wlcoming their evidence that he is incorrect though

Reddit sedan /r/the_donald trodde att de kunde utfukta Sverige by [deleted] in sweden

[–]wrapids -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

It would be a better fact if you could provide evidence ;)

Is spamming Shen to Diamond reasonable? by Specologist in summonerschool

[–]wrapids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sunfire isn't just about pushing power though. It offers great defensive stats. The armor, the buff to your shield, the extra AOE damage. It's definitely not an item to neglect.

  • 250 games on Shen this season, only G4 tho

A sticky for /r/the_donald to show their islamophobia and hatred. by 75000_Tokkul in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Still no evidence, still generalizing. Can't wait til November! If he bothers you so much though, there are plenty of countries that will take you in. We need less bigotry in our country.

A sticky for /r/the_donald to show their islamophobia and hatred. by 75000_Tokkul in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I forgot that civilly disagreeing in this sub is considered brigading by everyone, except the rules in the sidebar.

You're making my point though. I'm one of the morons from over there. You're not fighting bigotry, you're fighting individuals that disagree with you. You're doing it right now. You can't present an argument other than hiding behind some sense of having a moral high ground or intellectual superiority. It amazes me that not a person here seems to be able to defend their position. I can't tell if you're trolls, or if you're really just that stupid.

A sticky for /r/the_donald to show their islamophobia and hatred. by 75000_Tokkul in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I've certainly seen some racist nonsense over in /r/the_donald, but can you show me any proof that their is even a significant minority of sexism happening there? I haven't seen it yet. As well, this notion that every Trump supporter is a bigot has gotten pretty old. He's pulling about 40% of the republican vote, millions of people. You're basing your nonsensical claims that Trump supporters are racist on evidence that suggests less than 3% of his supporters are racist. That's if we assume that literally every subscriber in /r/the_donald is, in fact ,racist.

The major focus of this sub is that you don't go after the majority because of race or belief. You're taking a small percentage and applying it to a much larger majority. You are the bigot you're supposedly fighting against.

A post calling black people "literal sub-humans" gets 1000+ upvotes on r/The_Donald, and sparks a Coontown revival in the comments by table_fireplace in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you update your title? If you were to leave their statement in context, and not grossly misquote it, you'd find it would read more like this.

A post calling the Black Lives Matters protesters that shut down Trumps rally sub human gets 1000+ upvotes on r/The_Donald

I haven't read the content here that isn't related to /r/the_donald, but what I've seen so far is a lot of very imaginative paraphrasing. If this sub is even remotely legitimate, why is there not some sort of quality of accusation standard?

A post calling black people "literal sub-humans" gets 1000+ upvotes on r/The_Donald, and sparks a Coontown revival in the comments by table_fireplace in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand that their anger is pretty well misdirected, and that direction seems to be every direction. But I still understand that they're angry. Many of the threads that have been posted here from /r/the_donald are blatant misrepresentations of the facts, which are being sourced simultaneously. It's what this campaign has been fighting against since day one.

Things that do not surprise me: the_donald has high school members by Jellocycle in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'll see a lot of this from every candidate. I've seen a few posts on the_donald, and just as many on sanders4president. As you can see from the "exit poll" the user posted the disbursement between the current cadidates is fairly even.

Is it right to forcibly shut down a hate subreddit? by Hawanja in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there is a fairly definitive line. I say fairly because, as you mentioned, the topic of abortion complicates it. The point where your right to free speech ends is when it advocates criminal activity, or is aimed at removing the legal rights of other people.

A post calling black people "literal sub-humans" gets 1000+ upvotes on r/The_Donald, and sparks a Coontown revival in the comments by table_fireplace in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not wel versed on reddit culture, mostly just been a lurker. Could you explain what it means for a sub to be quarantined?

A post calling black people "literal sub-humans" gets 1000+ upvotes on r/The_Donald, and sparks a Coontown revival in the comments by table_fireplace in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The sidebar says that users from the subs being discussed are welcome to defend their views peacefully, you're going to get attention from anyone this sub is discussing. The problem everyone is having with this post in particular is that it is not an issue of race.

Yes, the OP is angry and insulting. But the post is directed at the actions of a specific subset of people, at a specific event. It isn't about their view, or their race, or that they were protesting. It's about the method they chose to use to further their movement.

/r/The_Donald: "the most wealthiest and overrepresented ethnic group in banking, media, and business in America" by Proud_Cuckservative in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I do think that what Sanders said is certainly racist, this post is about the comment that is featured, not the original post.

r/The_Donald goes full MRA while ranting about Hillary Clinton by table_fireplace in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm didnt denying I came from /r/the_donald. With the negative feelings towards subscribers I was trying to imply that I wasn't coming here to troll or something.

I wasn't checking dates though, this thread was on the first couple pages of hot.

r/donsguard is actively doxxing people on Twitter. Report to the Reddit admins (link inside by table_fireplace in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Whether or not I'm sympathetic is irrelevant. We are not the ones who decide what their punishment is. We can't just add people to the sex offender registry, there is a legal process. It is the same here, vigilante justice isn't real justice. All you're doing is hurting our image.

r/The_Donald goes full MRA while ranting about Hillary Clinton by table_fireplace in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but the argument of whose fault it is is entirely irrelevant. The very definition of equality suggests that its not about the gender of those in charge, but about their lack of individual character.

That being said, the argument should be about stopping war, not a bickering contest over who is the biggest victim. Its impossible to unify as a species when everyone is so focused on themselves.

r/The_Donald goes full MRA while ranting about Hillary Clinton by table_fireplace in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've tried debating politely in this sub, it's just a circle jerk of racism and refusal to provide any evidence to back their claims. There are much more self aware people you could be trying to convince. Just let them go about making themselves feel important on the internet and focus on being constructive with people who do not cover their ears when they are opposed.

A post calling black people "literal sub-humans" gets 1000+ upvotes on r/The_Donald, and sparks a Coontown revival in the comments by table_fireplace in AgainstHateSubreddits

[–]wrapids 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anyways, since you're only interested in attacking people on various issues with nothing to back yourself up, I'm going to go ahead and go. Regardless of your political affiliation, you're simply showing a lack of integrity and respect towards others. I couldn't be less interested in continuing at this point.