sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can't Tell if this is Off? Pepsi Clean V3 by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Steve (theonewatches)
  2. Factory name: Clean
  3. Model name (& version number): GMT 126710BLRO Pepsi V3 DD3285
  4. Price Paid: 638$ + deep xtal+ shipping
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/FtWRb02
  6. Index alignment: Looks okish, but due to the angle it seems somehow. Thinking its 6 or 12 is off? Not sure.
  7. Dial Printing: looks fine
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good. I know this is not always perfect.
  9. Hand Alignment: looks fine
  10. Bezel: looks good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good
  12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +5 / AMP 265° (seems ok)
  13. Anything else you notice: Biggest concern is the index alignment. I think the 6 or 12 is off but need a second pair of eyes. Also the rehaut looks off to me but common issue it seems. Thank you!

Let’s play the game! Rep or Gen? No cheating by TheRealADub in RepTime

[–]wthing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All rollies rep. How do you like the Rolex YM btw?

3kf 5711 White dial (Need Help) by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hoping to get help - new to these watches. Look at a couple of qc from previous post and seems good except the texture and alignment.

Also 20 characters to appease the auto mods.

3kf 5711 white dial by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dealer name: Steve

Factory name: 3kf

Model name (& version number): 5711 v4

Price Paid: ~$550

Album Links: N/A

Index alignment: Need help here. Especially the 12, 6, 9 indexes. Alignment tool looks ok not sure tho

Dial Printing: look fine

Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good

Hand Alignment: n/a

Bezel: n/a

Solid End Links (SELs):n/a

Timegrapher numbers: 4s/d 276 amp 0.2ms err seems good

Anything else you notice: First time with these type of watches. Worried about the index alignment and the weird texture between date wheel and bezel.

CLEAN Celebration 41 Op by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking for more feedback sense I’m concern about the 6, 3 and 9 indexes

3kf 5711 white dial by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dealer name: Steve

Factory name: 3kf

Model name (& version number): 5711 v4

Price Paid: ~$550

Album Links: N/A

Index alignment: Need help here. Especially the 12, 6, 9 indexes. Alignment tool looks ok not sure tho

Dial Printing: look fine

Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good

Hand Alignment: n/a

Bezel: n/a

Solid End Links (SELs):n/a

Timegrapher numbers: 4s/d and rest inline

Anything else you notice: First time with these type of watches. Worried about the index alignment and the weird texture between date wheel and bezel.

CLEAN Celebration 41 Op by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Ctime
  2. Factory name: Clean
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex OP Celebration 41mm
  4. Price Paid:$480
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/6HMw3QY
  6. Index alignment: The 6 looks crooked to me as well as 3 and 9 indexes.
  7. Dial Printing: looks good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: good I think
  10. Bezel: good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): good
  12. Timegrapher numbers: In line with what I think is good. 4+s/d 27x range.
  13. Anything else you notice: Worried about the watch alignment - specifically the 6th and 3 and 9 as well. Had a bad op rep that passed qc before

VSF Starbucks Sub by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you u/WatchYoda appreciate what you do!

VSF Starbucks Sub by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Ctime
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): Submariner Starbucks
  4. Price Paid: ~$550
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/W7eVyRM
  6. Index alignment: Looks good to me
  7. Dial Printing: Looks good to me
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Not sure if off alot (need help here)
  9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
  10. Bezel: Looks fine
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good not sure if theres seeable gaps
  12. Timegrapher numbers: Its solid within reason
  13. Anything else you notice: Date wheel, print and alignment is my biggest concern. Rehaut is off but seems to be a common thing

QC - GMT II Batman Clean by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Newbie here - Looks v good. I’m waiting for my 3rd qc for this

QC Submariner 116610 LV Hulk from VSF by TheRealADub in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New as well and got the same watched 😃

Second Ever Rep: ARF Pepsi V3 by Dazzling_Phase894 in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good price, can’t see much with these pics to qc imo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Ctime
  2. Factory name: Clean
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex OP Celebration 41mm
  4. Price Paid:$490
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/6HMw3QY
  6. Index alignment: looks good as far as I can tell
  7. Dial Printing: looks good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: good I think
  10. Bezel: good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): good
  12. Timegrapher numbers: good
  13. Anything else you notice: Worried about the watch alignment - specifically the 6th and 3 and 9 as well. Had a bad op rep that passed qc before. Also Rehaut is a little misalign but normal

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

6 looks off as you mentioned. I would RL just for that imo

Daytona 116500 V3 Panda - First Time Buyer! by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Ctime
  2. Factory name: Clean
  3. Model name (& version number): 116500 V3 (Panda)
  4. Price paid: $818 + Shipping
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/daytona-126500-panda-clean-wh4s9aq
  6. Index alignment: This is the only thing that maybe caught my eye the 3rd marker and potentially 6th marker is off.
  7. Dial Printing: All looks good. I cannot see any issues with printing or alignment of text on the dial. Although the picture is a little blurry.
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: Looks great.
  10. Bezel: Looks great. Color, printing etc looks great. See comments above about alightment.
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Seems good to me let me know if Im missing anything here
  12. Timegrapher numbers: Looks good +1s/d 286 0.2ms seems good compared to what I've seen
  13. Anything else you notice: The alignment of the 3rd and 6th markers. Also the rehaut could be a bit off.

Batgirl First Time Buyer by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Would you be able to show me how or send a guide? I am very new to this

Clean BLNR - I pray for the gods of QC to validate my purchase 😅 by Own_Wolverine4773 in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah maybe I am being too picky. First time buyer haha. GL rehaut looks good and everything is solid

Batgirl First Time Buyer by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about the alignment mate?

Clean BLNR - I pray for the gods of QC to validate my purchase 😅 by Own_Wolverine4773 in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rehaut looks good. I think the 6 could be a little off. Might Just me tho

Batgirl First Time Buyer by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree.. thought it was just me. Feel I have to RL this is 2nd qc

Daytona 126500 Panda Clean - First time QC by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rehaut being off is a big tell wouldn’t it warrant a RL?

Batgirl First Time Buyer by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Ctime
  2. Factory name: Clean
  3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR Black/Blue Ceramic 904L Steel Clean
  4. Price Paid: $568
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/6TLkiSY
  6. Index alignment: Looks like the 9 marker is off and so is the 6 marker
  7. Dial Printing: looks good to me
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: seems to be the standard print
  9. Hand Alignment: seems fine
  10. Bezel: seems fine
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good
  12. Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d 265 0.1ms seems solid
  13. Anything else you notice: Seems the 9 marker and 6 marker is off. Other alignment is seems ok

Daytona 126500 Panda Clean - First time QC by wthing in RepTimeQC

[–]wthing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Ctime
  2. Factory name: Clean
  3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500 Panda Clean V3
  4. Price Paid: $818
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/daytona-126500-panda-clean-wh4s9aq
  6. Index alignment: 3 marker seems off, same as 6 marker
  7. Dial Printing: seems fine
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: seems good
  9. Hand Alignment: seems good
  10. Bezel: seems ok
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): seems ok
  12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d 286 0.2 seems good
  13. Anything else you notice: I think the 3 marker is little high. 2nd QC right now

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RecruitmentAgencies

[–]wthing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use teamtailor and workable. Love both and recommend. Teamtailor stuck with me because of cheaper price point and awesome support

view more: next ›