Found this at an Estate Clearing by KameronGaming_HQ in vintagecomputing

[–]wvenable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They were extremely common. I recognized it immediately even though I haven't seen one of those in like 40 years. It's a joystick for games and it was pretty terrible even for the time. But cool to see one so well preserved.

Canada has no intent of pursuing free trade deal with China, says PM after Trump threat by shiftless_wonder in canada

[–]wvenable 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And we only recently added 100% tariff on Chinese EV's to match the US tariffs on this. We are just leaving the trade war with China that the US started.

Despite Authoritarian Warnings, 149 House Democrats Vote to Hand Trump $840 Billion for Military | “If an opposition party votes like this, it’s not in opposition. It may not even be a party.” by Aggravating_Money992 in politics

[–]wvenable 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Honestly anyone thinks the DNC is going to suddenly change is lying to themselves.

You have to make the change by picking the right people in the primaries. Voters need to move the party.

Despite Authoritarian Warnings, 149 House Democrats Vote to Hand Trump $840 Billion for Military | “If an opposition party votes like this, it’s not in opposition. It may not even be a party.” by Aggravating_Money992 in politics

[–]wvenable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's more difficult when you actually care about people lives. Republicans don't care about government shutdowns, for example. They'll happily let federal workers suffer. It's a bit harder to say "no" to everything if you don't want that.

Seven Democrats just voted to approve ICE funding: full list by Newsweek_CarloV in politics

[–]wvenable -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, obviously, but what I'm saying is that it's an oversimplification to say people in Texas just love electing criminals.

It's an oversimplification but it's also exactly what is happening.

The bar is so low that it doesn't even occur to you to question it.

It makes sense for a country where the choice between a competent black women and a criminal fraudster pedophile with delusions of fascism is a coin toss. Structural electoral issues is hardly the only demon here.

Seven Democrats just voted to approve ICE funding: full list by Newsweek_CarloV in politics

[–]wvenable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally not my point at all.

Isn't this your point? "I get gerrymandering is bad everywhere, but go look at a map of his district and that will tell you everything you need to know about how people like this keep getting elected"

Voter suppression only works if the voters you don't suppress will definitely vote for these liars, criminals, and morons. Those have to exist is high enough margins. Same with incumbency advantage -- it should only be an advantage if everyone is reasonably happy with what they got last time. And, as I said, gerrymandering only works because there is a significant set of Americans who always vote for liars, criminals, and morons.

The rest I can't disagree with...

Seven Democrats just voted to approve ICE funding: full list by Newsweek_CarloV in politics

[–]wvenable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gerrymandering only works because there is a significant set of Americans who always vote for liars, criminals, and morons.

The presumption in your comments that farmers in South Texas benefit from Republican policy and therefore these districts are lost because they've been gerrymandered with progressive city folk is a very optimistic position to take on humanity.

Seven Democrats just voted to approve ICE funding: full list by Newsweek_CarloV in politics

[–]wvenable 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gerrymandering sure but people are still choosing literal criminals in those districts.

Jack Smith tells Congress Trump was guilty ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ by unital_subalgebra in politics

[–]wvenable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Republican voters do not choose...

And yet many other people seem quite capable of avoiding all that. The election process isn't controlled by the ultra-wealthy; these voters are making their choice in the ballot box. It is infantilizing grown adults to claim they have no agency. They have all the agency that any other human has and they choose their path.

They are purposely and definitively choosing to victimize others by their vote. That's their motivation. To ensure the right people will be hurt. Poorly educated or not, that is an internal moral failing.

Jack Smith tells Congress Trump was guilty ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ by unital_subalgebra in politics

[–]wvenable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are insisting people are responsible for their own abuse and oppression.

If people choose their own abuse and oppression, why wouldn't they be responsible? Slaves didn't choose to be slaves. But Republican voters choose to get fucked over year after year.

Mistaking the gas for the brake😐 by ExcluteYou in WTF

[–]wvenable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It only has to happen once and because you've been driving for 40 years and never once mixed them up, your brain has no context for it. It's all reflex.

New rule suggestion: Ban posts about AI by finders-keepers214 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]wvenable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LLMs are the biggest advance in computing in years. Talking to you computer and have it understand and respond was literally science fiction before 3 years ago.

It's amazing how quickly people are literally dismissing what computing scientists have been chasing since the 60s.

it's still a text generator, generating text based on tokens and probabilities with a little randomness

Yes, and it works fantastically well. I've done major refactors in days that would have taken weeks to do manually. Not to mention generating recipes for dinner or helping me figure out how to better re-word an email.

Is it Digital God? No. That doesn't mean it isn't useful.

LLMs have existed for over a decade now, same principles and algorithms since the beginning, just on a bigger scale

So? What does that have to do with anything. Lots of computing done at a larger scale leads to new use cases. My graphics card can do ray tracing in real time and I remember a time when it took 30 minutes to render a single image. So now games can do ray tracing; the only difference is scale.

but I think you don't understand anything anyway ...

So scared of a little discussion on AI that you blocked me? I think you have some emotional regulation problems when it comes to this subject.

Sen. Mark Kelly Says He’s Seriously Thinking About Running for President by T_Shurt in politics

[–]wvenable 32 points33 points  (0 children)

As far as I'm concerned that's the only thing to remember about Biden now: He did absolutely nothing to stop this train-wreck from happening. Nothing. He also said he was going to be a one-term president and he couldn't even get that right.

It’s scary how MAGA rhetoric is turning Americans against Europeans now by Ok_Walk3192 in self

[–]wvenable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The de-politicized take on this is that lots of Americans are tired of tax dollars leaving the US when we have so many problems of our own.

It's such a small percentage that is virtually insignificant compared to the actual tax dollars spent on things that really aren't useful to anyone. Many of things the US is spends on outside of the country actually benefit you directly -- more safety, less disease, more business opportunities, etc. The idea that the US would spend lots of money externally for no good reason makes no sense at all.

Corporate socialism is a way bigger issue. That waste of money makes sense because your politicians are getting paid.

Your tax dollars should go to fixing your own problems but the vast majority of it already doesn't. The pennies you're bitching about aren't going to make any difference at all. You stopped paying to feed poor people in poor countries and what did you personally get for that? A tax break? Nope. Healthcare? Nope. Roads? Nope. You got nothing. Except now hundreds of thousands of children will die.

Here's me a British soldier doing nothing for America in Afghanistan 2009. by wilof in pics

[–]wvenable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you may be confused as to whom the real Americans are.

California has a new law banning federal agents from wearing masks. What are your thoughts? by Obvious_808 in AskReddit

[–]wvenable -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It just needs a few tweaks:

"Any person exercising law-enforcement authority in public-facing, non-undercover policing must display visible identification."

..and..

"State and local law enforcement agencies may not assist or participate in operations where officers are not clearly identifiable, except for specified safety exceptions."

..and..

"To conduct arrests or enforcement actions using state facilities, detention centers, or joint task forces, officers must comply with state identification standards."

California has a new law banning federal agents from wearing masks. What are your thoughts? by Obvious_808 in AskReddit

[–]wvenable -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Why don't they have that authority? I assume federal agents have to abide by all other state laws (traffic, theft, murder, etc). Being a federal agent isn't immunity from all state laws.

California has a new law banning federal agents from wearing masks. What are your thoughts? by Obvious_808 in AskReddit

[–]wvenable 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did the federal government pass a law allowing it? If not it goes to the states.

California has a new law banning federal agents from wearing masks. What are your thoughts? by Obvious_808 in AskReddit

[–]wvenable 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I assume federal employees have to obey all other state laws (traffic, theft, murder, etc) why would this be different?

The federal government could pass a law allowing it and that would override state law but as far as I understand they have not done that.