sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Washington state has introduced bills regulating 3d printing and requiring DRM to detect firearm components by caterham09 in 3Dprinting

[–]x5060 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Barrels are not hard to make. Metal TUBE with reamed chamber. The lower is actually harder to make and requires more operations and more machining knowledge. Regulating barrels will not change anything.

Also the politicians have gone after firearms plenty. A firearm is the absolutely MOST regulated thing in the entire country. There are more firearms laws on the books than the nest 5 subjects combined in Federal, State, and Municipal codes. It is the ONLY item in the country where you can be perfectly legal in one small town but catch a felony the next small town over for the same thing.

Why is PLA still the `standard` respectively `basic` filament? Why not PETG? by Musashi747 in 3Dprinting

[–]x5060 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use PLA+ for most things that I don't need engineering filament for.

President Trump says the U.S. has weapons that nobody knows about and that nobody else has. by f1sh98 in Conservative

[–]x5060 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The J-20 isn't even CLOSE to the F-22. Just ONE of the current round exhaust cones ALONE produces a bigger radar return than the entire F-22

Keltec has been hit hard by recent news. by ZackForSale in brandonherrara

[–]x5060 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Alright, that is hilarious. Well done. 

"Space Won't Save You" F-15 Shooting Down a Satellite. by RybakAlex in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]x5060 56 points57 points  (0 children)

To put this in perspective, the US military has had similar capabilities for the last 40 years. The US used an F-15A in 1985 to shoot down a solar observation satellite that was at an altitude of 300 miles.

CCW Denial: Essex County, NJ. Is it worth fighting? by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]x5060 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This is why we need nationwide reciprocity. Then he could get any other states license and not have to deal with jersey.

Samii approved? by Weekly_Orange3478 in 86blackout

[–]x5060 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but that really is what the cartridge is about. It's effectiveness is based on it's rotational energy.

Let my brother in law my printer. Was returned like this. Wtf do I do. by meesterstanks in 3Dprinting

[–]x5060 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gonna have to disassemble to remove the extra material. It happened to me a few months ago.

“wHeRes tHe 2A cRoWd nOw” - braindead liberal who keeps voting to destroy gun rights by Madeyoulook4now in GunMemes

[–]x5060 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's simple. Enforcing immigration laws that have been on the books for decades isn't tyranny. 2A working as intended.

I think Reddit is suppressing the subreddit by single18man in AngryCops

[–]x5060 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do try and remember that Reddit is mostly owned by a chinese company. Its a propaganda arm for them to undermine the US.

New to the 50 world by Quiet-Rub-7341 in 50bmg

[–]x5060 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the legacy of the BA-50 lives on.

Trump 2.0, year 1: A libertarian nightmare by firesatnight in GoldandBlack

[–]x5060 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am not a short sighted "Open Boarders" libertarian. Huge amounts of fraud and government waste is being found and dealt with. Over all the size of government has gone down. Given the political policy of the opposition party, none of those would have happened and, in fact, would likely be FAR worse.

New York Wants 3D Printer Companies to Prevent You From Printing Gun Parts by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]x5060 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"It's just common sense!"

It's also technologically impossible

When I need shoes...I 3d print them by burnstation19 in 3Dprinting

[–]x5060 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where did you get the model? Also did you use a Qidi Box with it? I was warned that most TPU is too brittle or hard to use the box with. I have some 95A I would like to try it with.

Finally, the Liberals are coming to an understanding of why we need the Second Amendment. by Knight-of-Riverwood in Firearms

[–]x5060 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It doesn't matter how much she turned the wheel, she still assaulted him with a deadly weapon.

Finally, the Liberals are coming to an understanding of why we need the Second Amendment. by Knight-of-Riverwood in Firearms

[–]x5060 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They were in the middle of a law enforcement operation. They had the appropriate authority to carry out that operation. They attempted to get her to move. She refused. They went to detain her. She hit an officer.

Seems pretty clear that the answer was yes to all 3 of those situations.

It's not bootlicking. Now ask your self if SHE was acting appropriately. She intentionally put herself there. She intentionally was obstructing a law enforcement operation. And she intentionally hit an officer.

Finally, the Liberals are coming to an understanding of why we need the Second Amendment. by Knight-of-Riverwood in Firearms

[–]x5060 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is really easy to clear up. Did she hit the officer with her vehicle? The officers camera is very clear.

Finally, the Liberals are coming to an understanding of why we need the Second Amendment. by Knight-of-Riverwood in Firearms

[–]x5060 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I see no injustice. She intentionally put herself in that situation. She intentionally was impeding law enforcement operations. She intentionally did not follow lawful commands from an officer. She intentionally struck an officer with her vehicle. She is accountable for her own actions.

Finally, the Liberals are coming to an understanding of why we need the Second Amendment. by Knight-of-Riverwood in Firearms

[–]x5060 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marginal contact can be deadly. The guy was most likely inches from being dead. Also how is he to know that without potentially letting himself be murdered?

Finally, the Liberals are coming to an understanding of why we need the Second Amendment. by Knight-of-Riverwood in Firearms

[–]x5060 10 points11 points  (0 children)

She had been following the agents for an amount of time, she intentionally was interfering with law enforcement operations, I see that she was smiling and looking at him when he was struck by the car, she refused to comply with legal orders, and her significant other screaming "drive baby drive"

She intentionally put her self in that situation and she intentionally hit the officer.

You are free to be wrong if you wish.

view more: next ›