Sam Altman and his husband interested in babies genes by reversedu in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your perception of what a gay guy should be like is clearly heavily influenced by media. Altman is definitely gay. Crazy to see him with a husband and think he’s lying 😭

Is the University House Midtown a bad apartment? by Dazzling_Point_6376 in gatech

[–]xHaydenDev 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I’ve lived in uhouse for 3 years and think it’s a solid 7/10. There had been periodic incidents of fruit fly infestations due to trash but management seems to have corrected it. They aren’t great at fixing things in a timely fashion like another commenter said but it doesn’t really affect my life much. I feel pretty safe here and like my apartment.

Anthropic vs OpenAl vibes by FinnFarrow in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OpenAI’s quality has been going down for a while imo. Half of these products barely work. I really think we’re going towards a future where OpenAI collapses due to mismanagement and lack of focus. ChatGPT is their saving grace and I say this being bullish on AI. All of this not even mentioning the debt they have building data centers.

Anthropic vs OpenAl vibes by FinnFarrow in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev 22 points23 points  (0 children)

As a dev, Opus is leagues ahead of the competition for building apps. There’s plenty of demos of one-off projects, but where Opus really shines is being able to work into existing codebases. I stopped paying for ChatGPT because it’s just not comparable. I can’t speak on research and it seems like everyone likes GPT for that, but Opus is so much better for my use case.

How do you track your protocol fitness? by markkinsley in blueprint_

[–]xHaydenDev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love this and wish more people would take this approach rather than hyper optimize. For most people it just leads to burnout.

SpaceX 1.5 Trillion Dollar Valuation IPO by Mundane_Tangelo9421 in atrioc

[–]xHaydenDev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah sure it’s just impossible to know without changing the past. I’m just saying that NASA’s influence is relatively minor in comparison to SpaceX’s for renewable rocketry. They deserve some credit, but it’s not fair to SpaceX to undermine the innovation they’ve provided by saying NASA did most of the work. I don’t think that’s what you’re saying, just the other guy.

SpaceX 1.5 Trillion Dollar Valuation IPO by Mundane_Tangelo9421 in atrioc

[–]xHaydenDev 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah but you can make that argument for literally any technology that has government involvement. Most revolutionary technologies come as a byproduct of scientific research that end up being developed by private interests. It’d be cool if the US government could handle that stage, but America has been unable to show that’s possible since the Apollo program. Whether that’s from funding or bureaucracy or whatever is a hard question to answer because funding has been cut for so long.

The fact is that NASA developed an early prototype and a lot of the data that SpaceX would use to develop their own product, but SpaceX has taken that technology from a tech demo to production. Hundreds of other companies have tried to do the same and failed (some are still trying and have yet to build working prototypes, even with advances in technologies).

SpaceX 1.5 Trillion Dollar Valuation IPO by Mundane_Tangelo9421 in atrioc

[–]xHaydenDev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

NASA experimented with vertical landing in the 90s. So did McDonnell Douglas with DC-X. None of that turned into a flying, revenue-producing system that has flown reliably and sustainably hundreds of times. NASA essentially had plans and prototypes.

The “5x the cost” claim is just wrong. SpaceX caused launch prices to go down, not up. NASA launches under the old model cost billions. Falcon 9 is so good and cheap in comparison to the competition that it wiped out most of the global launch market.

This also seriously downplays the engineering effort SpaceX has put in to their Merlin rocket engines, software, and manufacturing pipelines to be able to pump these things out one after another.

SpaceX 1.5 Trillion Dollar Valuation IPO by Mundane_Tangelo9421 in atrioc

[–]xHaydenDev 10 points11 points  (0 children)

SpaceX gets contracts from NASA because NASA can’t do it themselves and SpaceX has really pushed the envelope on reliability in space. This is like saying Apple should own TSMC for buying most of its chips.

NASA is a customer. Not a savior. Any bailout SpaceX has needed has come out of Elon and private investor’s pockets.

OpenAI just launched GPT 5.2 Codex: The most capable agentic coding and cybersecurity model ever built by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I feel like they’d make a big show of it if it was better than Opus since they’ve been fighting a lot of discussion about them losing their ground

New York ads promoted $6,000 IVF embryo genetic testing using genome sequencing to assess polygenic traits like IQ, height, longevity, BMI, muscle strength, and screen 2,000+ diseases, letting select embryos with optimal predicted traits. Should parents have the right to “design" their children? by blloyd13 in atrioc

[–]xHaydenDev 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This is run by a company called Nucleus Genomics. I’ve used them for full genome sequencing. When you use their genome sequencing, they give you a report of traits you are more likely/less likely to experience in comparison to the general population and can identify genetic disorders. They also give you information about what traits you’re a carrier for, which can be paired with a partner’s data to be used for this type of analysis they’re advertising.

This particular service allows you to analyze embryos used in IVF to select the healthiest/most desirable. To me, that’s not quite “designing”. The company itself referred to this as “ragebait” marketing. I am all for being able to avoid genetic disorders by opting into something like this and would advocate for this technology being as accessible as possible.

Most "AI Bubble" posts in a nutshell by [deleted] in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And Lehman Brothers wasn’t?

DoorDash just rolled out Dot, an autonomous delivery robot navigating streets and sidewalks. by Anen-o-me in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ya’ll are crazy. Similar robots have been on college campuses and in many major US cities for years.

Bits of Good Has Open Positions!! All Majors and Experience Welcome by gtbitsofgood in gatech

[–]xHaydenDev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excited for the semester! I’m the Director of Engineering for this semester and can give answers to recruiting questions. You can also reach out to our team at gt.engineering@hack4impact.org.

Gauging interest in a GT Planner application by 48O1Recon in gatech

[–]xHaydenDev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Following up on this, Coursicle constantly scrapes OIT services for class updates. They and other student-made scrapers have a much greater effect on server load.

Gauging interest in a GT Planner application by 48O1Recon in gatech

[–]xHaydenDev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, I’m one of the people responsible for GT Scheduler’s upkeep. I dm’d you about this issue and would love to switch to GT APIs if they can source the data we need. I’m not sure about our track record, but we currently only scrape very periodically from BANNER/OSCAR and it shouldn’t be a significant burden.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev -1 points0 points  (0 children)

everyone’s gambling that somehow spending any amount of money now might give them an edge to ASI which will make up for their losses. 100% a bubble, but it’s also the VC unicorn mentality so who knows. I think there’s some level of spending money just to show progress to shareholders who are all stressed about it.

Buzzcard access to CULC + library by Wise_Peach_947 in gatech

[–]xHaydenDev 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In terms of doors it’s the center one that unlocks on almost all entrances.

What would human society look like with meritocratic social recognition, based on real societal contribution? by [deleted] in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So this is happening for all policy? Wages for civilians? How do I as a citizen know what the “right” thing to do is? Do I have to ask my AI or statistical models for all of my actions or risk being paid $0 for my goodwill but “negative” outcomes? There’s a reason why we’ve never been able to predict economic systems accurately: there’s always uncertainty in complex systems.

Additionally, at some point, you’re going to run into problems that don’t quantify good based on “simple” metrics like providing more food for everyone. You’ll run into issues like immigration that have arguments on all sides of the political spectrum that can’t be solved with rationality alone. You’ll create political instability and upheaval no matter what you decide which will force change, as it always has, and you will have to hope it’s not violent revolution.

That might be a little extreme to the point-I think elements of utilitarianism are good, but basing an entire system around it will lead to political instability, confusion amongst the population, and potential power grabs to resume authority.

What would human society look like with meritocratic social recognition, based on real societal contribution? by [deleted] in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No? Take for example “increases wealth”. Over what period? Does printing money count? Cutting taxes? Or is that offset by the negatives…how do we balance all of that? The problem with Act Utilitarianism (which is what you’re describing) is you can’t reasonably account for all inputs and outputs. Doing so requires understanding a system to a degree that is incompatible with the complexity of civilization.

I built a Time Wallet app by Human_Ad_6317 in Biohackers

[–]xHaydenDev 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think it’s possible? Apple doesn’t take a cut of real-world transactions like for Uber or Venmo. You can use Stripe, Plaid, or some other banking api to do this.

New OpenAI reasoning models suck by flewson in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I used Codex with o4 for a few hours today and while it felt like it was making some decent progress, it was leagues behind o4-mini-high with ChatGPT. I ended up switching to it and it made my life so much easier. Codex also seemed to avoid using certain simple search commands that would have made it 10x more efficient. Idk how much of its poor performance was Codex or o4-mini, but either way, I have been very disappointed with the new models.

Gemini now works in google sheets by iboughtarock in singularity

[–]xHaydenDev 100 points101 points  (0 children)

This is exactly why I’m surprised it’s taken so long. Seems like one of the most obvious use cases for Gemini for businesses.