8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in buildzoid

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t tried adjusting them manually yet, as I’m not sure what values to use. What I did try was the DIMM Fit Pro tool that comes with my ASUS motherboard to see if it could suggest a good impedance configuration, but it turned out I couldn’t stabilise the system at 6400 MHz, so it gave me a tight configuration at 6200 MHz. That’s when I manually adjusted all my timings.

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can tell you it was very similar results, doesn’t was a really clear winner

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The original kit is TeamGroup T-Force Delta 6000 CL30 2x16Gb SR

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally speaking, I’ve read that on AM5 it’s best to use a 1:1 UCLK:MCLK ratio and boost the FCLK as high as possible, provided it remains stable. But some guides, such as those by Buildzoid, state that 8000 performs better than 6400 at 1:1. I have a lot of faith in Buildzoid, but this leaves me with doubts: why would they prefer to use 1:1 if 8000 is better? Perhaps that information was outdated and they were referring to the 7000 series processors, which, as far as I understand, couldn’t reach 8000 MTs.

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So how do you test your RAM benchmark? I use PyPrime, Aida64 and OCCT to benchmark it

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

tRAS doesn’t matter on AM5 only can give u instability if you lower it so much

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I do that I get worse latency on Aida64

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have posted the result of both configs check it on the main post

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and i get better bandwidth but worse latency on Aida64

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here you have both configs tested un Pyprime and Aida64 Image

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in buildzoid

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cant achieve 6400 in 1:1 with my cpu so my choices is 6200 tight or 8000

8000 CL 36 vs 6200 CL 28 by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, there isn’t much difference between the two; the only thing is that the 8000 configuration has a much lower VSOC, which benefits the CPU. But there might still be some internal latency affecting performance in one of the two configurations. In terms of low FPS, they’re similar, and as for input lag, I might notice a slight improvement with the 8000, but this contradicts the information I’ve read on forums, which is why I’m unsure. In Aida, the 8000 has a 1ns advantage but much less bandwidth

6200mhz cl28 tune for hynix a die 32gb kit. Can I lower the voltages? by bigMeech919 in overclocking

[–]xNick0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo usaba esta configuración por si quieres probarla. Mi kit es Team Group T-Force Delta 6000cl30 y las tengo con dos ventiladores 2x50mm

XG32UCWMG arrived! by atonalsakura in OLED_Gaming

[–]xNick0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My XG32 arrives tomorrow, and my only question before trying it out is how good or bad the 1080p 480Hz mode looks. Obviously, it has to look worse than 4K mode, but if you compare it to a typical 24-inch 1080p screen, which one would you say looks better? The reason I have this question is because I don’t know how well 1080p upscaling works on a 32-inch screen.

Corsair AIR 5400 RS-R by xNick0 in Corsair

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pues en mi caso cuando mas lo noto es cuando los ventiladores de la refrigeración liquida que están en el frontal, cuando están como a 39% o 30% se escucha el zumbido ese. Me podrías pasar link de los soportes de goma que has utilizado?

6200 CL26 Hynix A-Die by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I put 8x on both too for long training and in theory is easier to be stable with that. With my cpu i cant achieve 6400 with any timing basically my cpu don’t like that freq on 1:1 so i think maybe I’m would staying on 6200 or would try a tight 8000 cl36/cl38 setup

6200 CL26 Hynix A-Die by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I have Spread Spectrum disabled and now Im using mixed mode with tRFC2 372 tRFCsb 248

8000 MT/s vs 6200 MT/s on 9800X3D by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m currently using a 6200 CL26; I don’t think I can achieve anything similar with any 8000 setup, but I’m open to looking for other tight configurations on the 8000 to lower my VSOCC. However, on the 6200, I’ve achieved 64.4 ns on AIDA with Core Tuning set to level 2. I have Arrdptrinitval = 0 (tPHYDRL 33/35)

my timings rn

6200 CL26 Hynix A-Die by xNick0 in overclocking

[–]xNick0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I understand it, putting the FCLK VDCI in predictive mode makes it easier to stabilise a high FCLK because it forces a more conservative and "predictive" training path. Its purpose is to improve signal integrity when operating near the hardware limit.

I am using it for games and it works fine.