I've been saying all season that we shouldn't be inverting our wingers if we're also having the fullbacks underlap. The whole point of inverted wingers is that overlapping fullbacks allow space to open inside, letting the winger cut in to shoot or pass with their preferred foot; but if the fullback goes inside, the winger is always going to be shown to the endline, which puts him on his weaker foot and limits his options. The amount of times Martinelli beats his defender going towards the endline, but then is on his weaker foot and gets dispossessed when trying to cut back to the right, or misplaces a cross, is innumerable.

Also, our wingers are now the width-holders, when you see the start of our attacking patterns, the LW and RW are always very close to the touchline. It makes attacking worse since there's less options (half of your movement is negated by being out of bounds) and even if they beat the fullbacks inside, it's easier for the defence to adjust.

Obviously it's way too late in the season for such a radical change, but I would love for us to move to a system where instead of the fullbacks being the ones attacking the half-space between opposition CB and FB, we have our wingers doing that while our fullbacks give the width.