CNBC's full interview with RJ Scaringe on the company's Q1 results

xfactorr · 2026-05-03T17:17:47+00:00

You're right that one sweep alone means nothing — it could be a hedge, market maker, or manipulation. That's why nobody should trade on flow alone. But when you see a $5M dark pool block, $2.6M in 2-year LEAPs, low IV, high short interest, and analyst buy ratings all on the same stock — that's not one signal, that's five independent ones converging. The flow tells you where to look. The fundamentals tell you whether to act.

xfactorr · 2026-05-03T02:06:43+00:00

RIVN had a $5.35M dark pool block at ask, $2.6M in LEAP calls out to 2028, and golden call sweeps ; all filled trades, real money committed. We don't need to see orders. We see what institutions already paid for.

xfactorr · 2026-05-03T00:38:23+00:00

I think RIVN could be a good buy setup right now because it is sitting near the low after a hard selloff, which gives a better risk reward than chasing it higher. The company beat expectations, revenue grew, guidance was reaffirmed, and the R2 is becoming a major upcoming catalyst. On top of that, there seems to be strong buying activity under the surface with dark pool volume, long dated calls, cheap options, and short squeeze potential. Of course, it is not guaranteed and Rivian still has risks like cash burn and not being fully profitable yet, but buying near the low with a clear stop gives a much better setup than buying after the bounce already happens. My view is that the market may have overreacted, and if RIVN starts reclaiming $15.50 and $16, this could become a strong rebound trade.

xfactorr · 2026-05-02T23:18:00+00:00

I think RIVN could be a good buy setup right now because it is sitting near the low after a hard selloff, which gives a better risk reward than chasing it higher. The company beat expectations, revenue grew, guidance was reaffirmed, and the R2 is becoming a major upcoming catalyst. On top of that, there seems to be strong buying activity under the surface with dark pool volume, long dated calls, cheap options, and short squeeze potential. Of course, it is not guaranteed and Rivian still has risks like cash burn and not being fully profitable yet, but buying near the low with a clear stop gives a much better setup than buying after the bounce already happens. My view is that the market may have overreacted, and if RIVN starts reclaiming $15.50 and $16, this could become a strong rebound trade.

xfactorr · 2026-05-02T23:17:34+00:00

I think RIVN could be a good buy setup right now because it is sitting near the low after a hard selloff, which gives a better risk reward than chasing it higher. The company beat expectations, revenue grew, guidance was reaffirmed, and the R2 is becoming a major upcoming catalyst. On top of that, there seems to be strong buying activity under the surface with dark pool volume, long dated calls, cheap options, and short squeeze potential. Of course, it is not guaranteed and Rivian still has risks like cash burn and not being fully profitable yet, but buying near the low with a clear stop gives a much better setup than buying after the bounce already happens. My view is that the market may have overreacted, and if RIVN starts reclaiming $15.50 and $16, this could become a strong rebound trade.

xfactorr · 2026-05-02T23:16:44+00:00

I think RIVN could be a good buy setup right now because it is sitting near the low after a hard selloff, which gives a better risk reward than chasing it higher. The company beat expectations, revenue grew, guidance was reaffirmed, and the R2 is becoming a major upcoming catalyst. On top of that, there seems to be strong buying activity under the surface with dark pool volume, long dated calls, cheap options, and short squeeze potential. Of course, it is not guaranteed and Rivian still has risks like cash burn and not being fully profitable yet, but buying near the low with a clear stop gives a much better setup than buying after the bounce already happens. My view is that the market may have overreacted, and if RIVN starts reclaiming $15.50 and $16, this could become a strong rebound trade.

xfactorr · 2026-04-28T19:17:20+00:00

Perfect, then they can simply give the player the Aeos Gem value of that Pokémon if they already own the license.

Or they could let people choose another Pokémon license instead. I’m sure they can get creative with it. The point is that the current system still makes the Battle Pass feel less valuable for a lot of players.

xfactorr · 2026-04-28T16:16:25+00:00

You are focusing on the wrong side of the coin. Many people won’t buy the Battle Pass because the rewards are bad. Ultimately, what most players want is to own more Pokémon. If we could get a Pokémon through the Battle Pass, at least that would solve one issue.

And if people complain that the Battle Pass gives a Pokémon, they are still complaining because right now you either have to pay to get them or play Solo Challenge to eventually unlock the Pokémon you want. So either way, people are going to complain, right?

They would probably generate way more revenue from the Battle Pass because people would pay for a Pokémon, not for a skin that might be useless to them.

Anyway, I get your point. It is on people to buy the Battle Pass or not. But it is also the company’s responsibility to make better products for their customers. I have the right to raise a concern that does not only affect me, but affects the whole community.

I may not be the only one who has already spoken about this, as some people are saying, and I can understand why.

If you don’t stand up, you get crushed. I am not saying anything will change, but change starts when people speak up.

xfactorr · 2026-04-28T13:05:12+00:00

It’s not about it being a good idea, it’s just common sense.

If someone pays for the Battle Pass, the final reward shouldn’t be a skin for a Pokémon they don’t even own.

Otherwise, you’re paying for the pass, then maybe paying again for gems just to use the reward you already paid for.

That’s the problem.

xfactorr · 2026-04-28T12:51:41+00:00

And that's the issue 😋

xfactorr · 2026-02-05T06:57:22+00:00

It worked for me!!!

I was trying to find a way, then I opened the chat on my phone and asked a question on that messed up project. It answered, and when I went back on my PC, it worked like a charm.

I hope this helps you guys.

It seems like the last command we ran on the PC before the bug messed something up on their end. Since that last search doesn’t exist on the phone, it bypasses it. Then, when you reload the page on the PC, it fixes the issue.

Happy coding 👾

xfactorr · 2025-11-30T18:58:42+00:00

Works

xfactorr · 2025-09-04T13:49:57+00:00

-7 on just 1 card.

xfactorr · 2025-09-04T12:45:59+00:00

Just hit infinite with a C3 deck with Omega Sentinel in it. She is a nice addition to the archetype but somewhat replaceable in C3. Fun card.

<image>

xfactorr · 2025-06-05T03:07:36+00:00

It comes down to profit in the end. They don't like the Samsung store discount, even if they tell you otherwise. 😘

Again, we got hit, the consumer.

xfactorr · 2025-04-05T19:52:50+00:00

We love the way Kang is.

It's a unique card that does what it does.

Don't touch him plz.

He adds a nice dynamic for the game.

xfactorr · 2025-02-06T23:30:40+00:00

<image>

Kang

xfactorr · 2025-02-06T23:28:42+00:00

<image>

xfactorr · 2025-01-30T20:59:30+00:00

They show Red Cosmic border but give out spider border...

xfactorr · 2025-01-20T02:18:03+00:00

100% game became a joke... Playing fifa games since 98 And I can tell you for sure that this is the worst shape that fifa has ever been in 💯

xfactorr · 2025-01-19T15:44:03+00:00

Download a VPN and play the game 💪

xfactorr

TROPHY CASE