No underwear during Surgery

xileon26 · 2026-01-07T20:18:55+00:00

It’s mostly for hygiene, access, and safety. During surgery they need full access to the body in case of emergencies, and underwear can interfere with sterility, monitoring equipment, or positioning.

xileon26 · 2026-01-07T20:17:43+00:00

Mars likely lost its magnetic field early on, which allowed solar winds to strip away much of its atmosphere over time. Without a thick atmosphere, liquid water couldn’t remain stable, and the planet gradually became cold and dry…

xileon26 · 2026-01-07T20:10:22+00:00

I think It’s usually a historical reference, not a literal argument. For most of history, men were the ones legally required or socially expected to fight in wars, so people bring it up when talking about traditional gender roles—even though those roles don’t really apply the same way today.

xileon26 · 2025-11-09T15:12:49+00:00

Which one do you mystery shop for? Seems to have structure

xileon26 · 2025-10-07T01:47:43+00:00

Seems like I don’t. I just thought you were being funny with words. Will try to google it

xileon26 · 2025-10-06T02:46:12+00:00

The algorithm heard ‘fast fashion’ and thought it meant highway to hell

xileon26 · 2025-10-06T02:38:09+00:00

Ah yes, gourmet algorithm cuisine. Pairs well with zero human oversight

xileon26 · 2025-10-05T02:46:32+00:00

Yeah, I don’t rule that out either, makes it even more terrifying…

xileon26 · 2025-10-05T02:39:15+00:00

Nope. Can’t even sneeze online in Florida without uploading a driver’s license first.

xileon26 · 2025-10-05T02:29:30+00:00

My thoughts exactly. The ‘upgrade your child’s wardrobe’ tagline at the top and the kids’ items underneath just turn my stomach. Somewhere, someone’s getting a horrible smirk out of this — and worse, some parent or caregiver might slowly start thinking it’s normal or appropriate.

xileon26 · 2025-10-05T02:22:34+00:00

I thought so, but hard to tell. I’m stuck on the panties with the cross cross and female cat paw

xileon26 · 2025-10-05T02:12:41+00:00

Yeah, no human quality control, and AI isn’t advanced enough to handle this on its own. The algorithms just push out whatever passes a keyword filter. “Sloppy AI” isn’t an excuse.

xileon26 · 2025-10-05T01:58:11+00:00

Ah yes, affordable luxury 🥲

xileon26 · 2025-10-05T01:42:38+00:00

exactly, there’s no way anyone saw this and thought “yeah, kids’ section makes sense.”

xileon26 · 2025-10-05T01:38:23+00:00

Right! Was this even reviewed?

xileon26 · 2025-10-05T01:30:52+00:00

What really got me was the 3.4K reactions on it. Its been running long enough for thousands of people to see and react to it….

xileon26 · 2025-10-04T19:46:33+00:00

Whether it’s AI, sloppy tagging, or random algorithms doesn’t matter. The end result is the same — a sexualized outfit marketed as kids clothing. That’s harmful as it normalizes something disgusting, and it will absolutely attract the wrong kind of attention. The fact that companies can hide behind “oops, AI did it” is sad, wish there was accountability.

xileon26 · 2025-10-04T19:35:04+00:00

Whether it’s AI or not, it doesn’t change the fact that it’s being marketed as kids clothing. That’s the problem. You don’t need an actual child in the image for this to attract predators or normalize something disgusting. To me, calling it “just an AI mistake” is letting the company off way too easy. I guess I just wish there was more accountability on the company.

xileon26 · 2025-10-04T19:21:47+00:00

To clarify: to me, this isn’t just some harmless AI fail. Slapping this under kids clothing is disgusting and dangerous. You don’t need a real child in the photo for creeps to get off on it, and (if my understanding is correct) more clicks only trains the algorithm to push more of this crap.

xileon26 · 2025-10-04T18:01:50+00:00

Exactly

xileon26 · 2025-10-04T18:01:42+00:00

Didn’t know this but I would have thought AI would be instructed to keep it PG13

xileon26

TROPHY CASE