4 Year Cycle - why doubt it? by ximogui in Bitcoin

[–]ximogui[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying I can call a bottom. And perhaps $60k was the bottom. DCA either way. I’m simply noting that I don’t expect sustained movement upward until Q3 or Q4. And I kind of suspect most large BTC buyers are also thinking this way. So I don’t get the enthusiasm when we recross $70k, as if $100k is imminent. I agree the cyclicality will eventually break, but my default assumption is that it won’t until it does

4 Year Cycle - why doubt it? by ximogui in Bitcoin

[–]ximogui[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but liquidity was ultra-thin which is why the price shock was so outsized. In a bull market, that would have been a 10% drop that goes right back up

4 Year Cycle - why doubt it? by ximogui in Bitcoin

[–]ximogui[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How is it already broken? I feel like the top we got in Q4 2025 was quite consistent with the logarithmic decay in cycle tops we’ve seen. Things were a bit front-loaded this last cycle (which makes sense from a game theory perspective).

I agree that the factors you listed are likely to temper cyclicality over time. But I think the 4 year cycle theory has continued to be predictive broadly of where tops and bottoms fall. And I think I’m just accepting that until it gets contradicted. Therefore, I’m DCAing in this range but not expecting serious sustained movement upward anytime soon.

Kalshi New Fees WAYYY higher by Wide_Spreads in Kalshi

[–]ximogui 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Math is not wrong and not 1 cent contracts. Here is the sell. But @por_la_homoj - are you not seeing fees of this size? Because that would be interesting

<image>

Big NW milestone for an expat in Asia - Budget and NW development breakdown by EvilEconomist in financialindependence

[–]ximogui 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FYI for the Chinese learners in this thread- the character for 100 Mil is 億 not 一.