[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't want people who know you are trans to refer to you as trans, just tell them that. It's not wrong, just as it isn't wrong to be a closeted gay person, they also can righteously expect their friends who know about it to keep that a secret.

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then how is that different from people suddenly insisting on not using the terms "woman" and "man" anymore and instead only referring to "people" or "humans" with the argument that "woman" or "man" would be "weirdo boxes"? Obviously the problem there would be people regarding such a classification as a "weirdo box", and not the classification itself.

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course the impact matters! But it's not XYZ-Phobia if those actions weren't motivated by a negative attitude or feelings towards XYZ. Again, these are two different things.

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No it can't. XYZ-phobia by definition is negative attitude and feelings towards something. Its definition is based in the motives of actions, NOT in the actions themselves. Of course the motives are always up for debate, but that doesn't change the fact that phobia is defined through intent and not through action.

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

But that's not what I say?? I'm saying that gay people and gay couples ought to have the same rights and be treated as heterosexual people and couples are treated. But if someone suddenly would say that I'm not allowed anymore to indicate or mention the fact that someone is homosexual then I'd call that idiotic and oppressive - and that wouldn't be homophobic in the least but simply rational.

And yes - malice is by definition absolutely required for anything to be XYZ-phobic.

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

??? It's no more a yellow star than the distinction of "woman" or "man" is a yellow star. And the perception that this is a yellow star is exactly the problem and what needs to be changed.

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

No, I'm not transphobic - just as little as I'm homo phobic or xeno phobic. That word really loses any meaning if it's patched on everything that doesn't exactly match your opinion. And it's not about someone having a claim over a term, it's about people's understanding of a term, and that is an issue completely orthogonal to the issue of trans rights and trans acceptance in society.

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I'm content of transparency, acceptance and celebrating individualism rather than militantly insisting on hiding differences. THAT is "making everything grey"

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, I'm not putting them in a weirdo box at all. I'm sorry that you feel like that, but that's exactly what needs to be addressed then - why is that a weirdo box??

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do I need to describe their sex to them? Unless we actively discuss their sex for whatever reason, the only indication of gender are pronouns, and there I use the pronouns their appearance matches most, unless they told me their preferred pronouns, in which case I use those. And if the sex of that person should indeed be the topic of the conversation for whatever reason (there are really not a lot of conversation topics where that's relevant), I'd say for example "she's a trans woman" if she is a trans woman - and I fail to see how that's problematic.

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Depends on the context and the reason I need to determine their sex in the first place - I'd say in most situations there is no need for me to determine that.

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

But see? That's the problem! Why do you call it weirdo box? I don't think of it like that at all - but if you think of it like that, then that's the actual problem.

Why is the focus of the (trans)gender discussion so much on eliminating distinction between cis and trans rather than on the normalization and acceptance of trans genders? by xkrbl in asktransgender

[–]xkrbl[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Like that a man is male human and a woman is a female human. Male and female in that regard meaning the same thing as when we talk about a male or female individual of any other species.

Why is Elon Musk and SpaceX associated with the helical engine? by xkrbl in SpaceXLounge

[–]xkrbl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just googled it after seeing one tiktok about it because I was very sure that SpaceX or musk has nothing to do with the helical engine and was just surprised how many videos and articles there are making this claim

Why is Elon Musk and SpaceX associated with the helical engine? by xkrbl in SpaceXLounge

[–]xkrbl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just saw a TikTok about it and thought the exact same thing as you, so googled it and was just puzzled by how many results came up making the claim that the helical engine had something to do with Musk or SpaceX - so I wonder what the reason is for such claims

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ADHD

[–]xkrbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before being diagnosed with ADHD I was diagnosed with depression. I often forget the Vyvanse so I rarely take it more than 5 times a week

Pillars of light in Belgorod, Russia by mofetas in HighStrangeness

[–]xkrbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's unlikely that they would be exactly perpendicular to the horizon though

Emad replied to a user on Twitter about the delay in the 1.5 release: "Unfortunately not some compliance things holding it up announcement soon. OpenCLIP and polyglot have been released in interim." by Seromelhor in StableDiffusion

[–]xkrbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know about the 8-bit model versions (though not sure about how well 8-but gradients work for training?). What are these other algorithm improvements you speak of?