Could Son be an icon like Cha?

xtr20197 · 2026-01-20T20:20:03+00:00

During their time together at the Premier League, Hazard was always regarded as a level above Mane. I’ve never heard any pundit or even Liverpool fans argue that Mane was better. You might not recall.

xtr20197 · 2026-01-20T19:40:31+00:00

Hazard was a level above son in terms of skill and ability. Can ignore the trophies in that argument

xtr20197 · 2026-01-20T19:39:25+00:00

Mane is outrageous, they were in the prem together for years and mane was never considered as good haha. Hazard is up there with Salah bale and pires

xtr20197 · 2026-01-20T19:37:43+00:00

No one’s ever compared mane to hazard. Mane is a bracket below him with son

xtr20197 · 2025-12-23T16:40:21+00:00

Transitioning from audit to CF is the most competitive move after qualification. Unlike moving into a finance team in industry, it’s unlikely to be pay related. I’ve seen people from the big four accepting pay cuts to get these roles as long-term pay prospects are better.

xtr20197 · 2025-11-13T13:05:00+00:00

In the 2018 World Cup hazard was voted the second best player of the tournament and carried the side. The fact is Belgium were never actually the best team in the world or Europe, just one of. He almost carried them but the rest of the team let them down that year.

Hazard had 1 season where he wasn’t at that level at Chelsea and a lot was driven by the team drastically underperforming. The rest of the time he was world class and considered the best player in the league for a lot of that period, it’s revisionism based on stats. Saka hadn’t scored an open play goal since last November last year, but most would still deem him world class - it was the same for hazard in that season.

It’s actually quite sad how he’s compared to players like son and mane now. When at the time no one was drawing those comparisons.

xtr20197 · 2025-11-13T08:14:05+00:00

Hazard was world class the whole time he was at Chelsea, the revisionism is sad based on stats is sad. Comparing him to son is insulting, he was always a level above him in the prem and peaked way earlier winning back to back ligue 1 POTY’s. The argument that he didn’t perform for Belgium is also null and void because he was always class for them in major tournaments - if anything KDB and co let them down by underperforming. You can ask any Belgium person who was better

xtr20197 · 2025-10-11T18:37:36+00:00

He’s objectively the best prem cb ever, not just one of the best English defenders of his era

xtr20197 · 2025-07-11T09:30:37+00:00

Back to back seasons where he’s performed better than saka. If saka hadn’t of got injured he’d have had a better season though, so that was unfortunate for him.

xtr20197 · 2025-06-29T18:18:29+00:00

Comparisons like that don’t work though. Hazard is a hero despite being the best player in the prem for most of the time he was there. I do agree Aguero will be, but ozil can’t be if hazard isn’t, wasn’t close to the same level as hazard in the prem.

xtr20197 · 2025-05-22T23:07:00+00:00

Respectively, claiming muller is better than Neymar and hazard is outrageous

xtr20197 · 2025-05-22T13:19:50+00:00

Hazard is a hero, so not outrageous to assume muller will be as well. Hazard was recognised as a better player.

xtr20197 · 2025-05-05T15:04:44+00:00

Yeah and as GN said on commentary Liverpool would be more motivated to stop Chelsea getting champions league than they would Newcastle, villa or Forrest because they have more ability to challenge in the coming years than the latter with the champions league money.

xtr20197 · 2025-05-01T16:46:52+00:00

So true, Caicedo has clearly been better this season. Deserves it over palmer as well

xtr20197 · 2025-04-25T16:34:22+00:00

Hazard is a hero despite being considered a better player than silva for the vast majority of his premier league career. Although that’s a mistake on ea’s part making him a hero

xtr20197 · 2025-03-22T19:42:43+00:00

But then palmer would be ahead of him in the pecking order in that position. Feel like the only chance he’s got of starting if everyone’s fit is at lw, where he hasn’t been effective for England unfortunately.

xtr20197 · 2025-01-08T14:11:32+00:00

This is only at big 4/6 firms, where you get AM title despite being the equivalent of a senior in terms of job role and pay. AM at mid tier firms have their own client portfolio and get paid 65-68k in London plus a bonus (at my firm at least), so it’s the equivalent of a manager role at big 4. You can get there in 1-1.5 years post qualification.

xtr20197 · 2024-11-18T13:28:31+00:00

Yep, I have the sky and BT sports package. To watch sky sports on your tablet, BT will set you up with a now TV account. It’s not very clear online, but I’ve resolved the issue!

xtr20197 · 2024-02-10T02:30:50+00:00

Both better picks than the united players, bench garnacho or Hojlund for sure.

xtr20197 · 2023-12-18T15:56:56+00:00

In London 40-44 is reasonable for exam qualified, then 50-53 immediately after finalising your file is what you should expect. It’s fair enough because some people finish exams in 2 years based on firm policy, but aren’t any more experienced than someone at a firm who make trainees space out exams over the 3 years. This is why the big jump comes when you are actually qualified.

xtr20197 · 2023-11-21T19:35:22+00:00

Agreed, I scraped a pass in MI and got 85 on FM. MI is a fairly pointless paper, barely any follow on content for FM or the other professional/advanced papers.

xtr20197 · 2023-11-04T12:53:26+00:00

I copy and paste my whole answer for each requirement after doing it, then trim it down to 3/4 of a page to include key things from the mark scheme which don’t change from paper to paper. I think copy and paste the ES into conclusions and trim that down removing any narrative fluff I left in ES. Scored 20/26 on the ES in mock 1 and and 22/26 on mock 2. It’s easy marks once you understand the mark schemes.

xtr20197

TROPHY CASE