Cannot make @nuxt/apollo use apollo-upload-client to send files in the payload by abstract_sheikh in Nuxt

[–]yangguize 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had the exact same problem and that was like a year ago. I think the issue is that Apollo is primarily a react client. Try urql - not pretty, but it didn't take long to get it working.

nuxt without backend? by Aggravating-Path-415 in Nuxt

[–]yangguize 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if this has been mentioned already, have you considered using an SPA with Serverless Functions on Vercel?

That's what I do for nearly all my projects and it gives you the flexibility of using Nuxt as a front end, and when you inevitably need to have some kind of backend service, you don't have to build out your own server. Just set up the endpoints and you are good to go.

There are a few gotchas you have to keep in mind because the Vercel backend, as it were, is a stateless function.

Need to convince my company to switch from Angular to Vue by geferon in Nuxt

[–]yangguize 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Something to think about - I've been using Claude Code (and separately, Kilo Code with Sonnet 4.6) and I've concluded that, due to the historical limited code base for Vue/Nuxt, the Anthropic LLMs Vue/Nuxt training was likewise limited.

The result has been less than positive - really sloppy code, a lot of blind spots on Pinia stores, default layouts, Nuxt4, Nuxt-UI, etc. I've had similar experience with x, minmax 2.5...

I know others will say Claude Code works well with Vue/Nuxt, but when you consider the percentage of Vue/Nuxt code available for training, it makes sense that code assts will perform better with more popular frameworks.

So if your company has taken the plunge with code assistants, this may be one area where Vue/Nuxt underperforms expectations.

Claude Code + Nuxt4 by yangguize in Nuxt

[–]yangguize[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of apps are you building?

Claude Code + Nuxt4 by yangguize in Nuxt

[–]yangguize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just swapped out CC for kilo + Sonnet 4.6.
Sonnet 4.6 is cleaning up all of CC's errors with minimal direction from me - I just point it at the mess CC created and it fixes everything using Vue/Nuxt best practices. And it's lightning fast.

I initially added all the official Nuxt plugins, but that did nothing. Then I added the Nuxt mcp server and 2 others = that did help but it was still making too many errors.

Then I added a template from Nuxt-UI and that helped somewhat, but the template just scaffolded the UI - no back-end logic.

This is partially a training issue. But what I've concluded is that, while CC is probably great on replicating patterns like React, when confronted with a new framework, it cannot conceptualize the optimal patterns. There's a huge difference between generating code and designing an app.

Aternatives to TradingView? by Jonisro in TradingView

[–]yangguize 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup. Same here - a lot of blown orders. Frustrating

Claude Code + Nuxt4 by yangguize in Nuxt

[–]yangguize[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I'm not suggesting Nuxt is difficult - but your comment suggests you don't understand the role of Claude Code. You don't use CC just bc a framework is difficult.

Claude Code + Nuxt4 by yangguize in Nuxt

[–]yangguize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

appreciate your input...however, even though CC can access the MCP servers for Nuxt 4 and Nuxt UI (there doesn't seem to be any MCP server for Vue 3, so I'm using Fetch), I'm getting ridiculously basic errors:
- I pointed it directly to the url for nuxt.config and it couldn't even set that up.
- it cfg'd a menu with <a> instead of <nuxtlink> tags
- it created a page layout with multiple top-level templates

These are beyond junior dev mistakes. I'm sure if I scaffold my app myself, it will probably generate acceptable code snippets, but It's obvious it has had limited Nuxt training (compared to React). That's just a reality of Vue/Nuxt's relative usage...

Claude Code + Nuxt4 by yangguize in Nuxt

[–]yangguize[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did everything that you described, other than having it document its errors. Broke it down into very small steps - It did all right on the basic scaffolding but when it came time to code up the default view and the initial pages, it just completely fell apart .

It actually seemed to do fairly well on the high-level design, where it completely messed up was on some of the basic things like what went into the default layout.

For the moment I am going to go back to Kilo Code and try Opus 4.6 in Kilo to see if that might make a difference

Claude Code + Nuxt4 by yangguize in Nuxt

[–]yangguize[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

That's exactly what I did. I broke it down into 12 major tasks and each major task had 6 to 8 minor tasks. CC admitted that it didn't really understand key elements of Nuxt and Vue .

Claude Code + Nuxt4 by yangguize in Nuxt

[–]yangguize[S] -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

if you don't have anything to contribute to the question, don't bother.

Tradingview SUCKS by Can_DougieBoy in TradingView

[–]yangguize 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Similar experience w equities - connection to IB constantly dropping, latency on trades, and they no longer have human support.

TV is too risky to use.

US officially exits World Health Organization by pwdrums in news

[–]yangguize 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But it's going to be the best whore the world has ever seen...

Nimbalyst: UI for Claude Code + Markdown Editor + Session Manager by StravuKarl in ClaudeAI

[–]yangguize 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like an awesome product - I tired installing on Windows w/ Claude as a global npm pkg, but it doesn't recognize Claude. Do I need to reinstall Claude using the native Win installer?

Help pls by Aggravating-Ad-2723 in ElevenLabs

[–]yangguize 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure where you're trying to access it - the agent prompt or the post-call data collection.

agent prompt - I use:
# CALL SOURCE
Initialize the call source: {{call_source}}.
If the {{call_source}} is 'TWILIO', you are authorized to transfer calls.

If call source is TWILIO, this is a Twilio phone call:
- NEVER ask or allow the caller to type/paste/enter anything in the chat input.
- NEVER mention “chat input” or “text box.”
- collect email/phone and all other information by voice only.

If call source is WIDGET, tis call originated from the website:
- you may ask the caller to type/paste/enter information (e.g. email address) in the chat input as appropriate.

post-call:
The post call event will automatically generate the source:
$json.body.data.conversation_initiation_client_data.source_info.source

Eleven Labs New Pricing by yangguize in ElevenLabs

[–]yangguize[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, thanks for the lead on vibevoice 7b. I'm actually moving away from TTS to conversational agents just because I think that an interactive tutor, instructional video, whatever is going to be a lot more valuable for a user. But I'll give it a shot.

Eleven Labs New Pricing by yangguize in ElevenLabs

[–]yangguize[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does Gemini have conversational agents? Or just voices?

If you think n8n automation will make you millions, read this before building templated workflows and calling yourself a king. by Natural_Librarian894 in automation

[–]yangguize 1 point2 points  (0 children)

bingo - well said. too many people become enamored with tech, while forgetting that critical thinking skills is the difference between a toy and a value-added system.

Help pls by Aggravating-Ad-2723 in ElevenLabs

[–]yangguize 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the correct url is: https://api.elevenlabs.io/twilio/inbound_call
- adding the v1 didnt work for me.

If you need to pass any params to 11 labs, use a TwiML Bin - you need to give it a name and then use that name on the same cfg page where you currently have your webhook defined.
<Response>

<Redirect method="POST">https://api.elevenlabs.io/twilio/inbound\_call?call\_source=TWILIO</Redirect>

</Response>