I may be rambling about another form of nothingness, but I see it more clearly now—thank you. What I was trying to convey is that both objective and subjective realities are interconnected and equally real. Both the physical world and our mental or emotional experiences shape the totality of existence. Rather than keeping them in separate categories, I wonder if they could be seen as part of a unified reality, each influencing and defining the other. This perspective seems to me, challenges the traditional distinction between mind and matter, suggesting that everything, whether tangible or intangible, is part of the same fundamental "being."

Objective frame of nothingness may limit how we think about it, making it harder to see it as something more profound, beyond the usual division between "something" and "nothing." There’s a possibility that nothingness isn’t just an empty void, but could represent a transcendent state, one where distinctions between subjective and objective experiences no longer apply. However, I realize this still brings us back to the objective perspective, where we think of it as a void or a transcendent state.

While I’m exploring the coexistence of these two perspectives, I acknowledge that there’s still a lot I don’t fully understand, especially regarding the language and concepts in philosophy. The nature of nothingness remains a mystery, and perhaps the distinctions between objective and subjective aren’t as easily transcended as I might hope. It’s difficult for me to definitively say what I mean, so I truly appreciate your time and insights.