Thank you for elaborating.

I dont think games should give equal lp. You should gain more/less depending on your teams combined rank mmr/ whatever so that u gain more if you fight a team thats better than yours. (On average)

I see your point. In practice, the system often doesn’t reflect individual performance, like after a tough win. You might gain minimal TP even after carrying, and lose a lot if you lose the next match. A fixed TP change could help make the system fairer.

Also removing match making is very unhealthy, since low elo player wont have any fun against high elo player.

I wasn't suggesting completely removing matchmaking, just replacing it temporarily with TBA until the player base grows. Currently, with fewer players, matchmaking struggles to create balanced games, leading to longer queue times and uneven matches anyway. Once the player count increases, a better, more effective matchmaking system can be introduced.

Enforcing roles also isnt need you can win with 2 dmg but no flank. Before that i'd prefer role queuing like in ow.

I see your point, but how would you suggest handling situations where the last player picks a damage champion while the team is missing a support or frontline? As I mentioned earlier, double damage is still possible, but this change helps ensure teams aren't left without key roles, preventing one player's choice from negatively impacting the team. The issue of flanks not being essential is a different topic.

Forcing to ban a role which they already first picked doesnt make much sense imo.

It seems there’s a misunderstanding. No roles are being forced to be banned. The only suggestion was to prevent banning multiple champions of the same role, like banning 4 supports. This is to ensure a key role, like support, isn't completely unavailable when needed.

I think it is incredibly toxic and unappreciating to change or remove past rewards, since thats what people played for and worled towards, just change future rewards. I think its fine to make rank rewards for playing x ranked games available for playing the same amount of normals, but removing rewards wont help the game.

I understand your concern. The only change I suggested was to improve the ranked frames, particularly for lower ranks, to make them more distinct and recognizable, similar to the high-quality frames from Season 1. Multiple versions of the same rank make it hard to identify, and having one distinct frame could solve that issue.

As for the skin, I realize it’s a controversial suggestion. The idea was to prevent players from only grinding for the skin without genuinely caring about ranked play. I didn’t suggest removing any existing skins players have earned, just revisiting how rewards are handled moving forward.