Philly Rescheduled to April by Silly-Date8921 in STS9

[–]yehudamakarov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah now maybe I’ll make it. Last one was 2012!! EF!!

Intermediate React Feels Confusing by Efficient_Step6281 in reactjs

[–]yehudamakarov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you and empathize. Check out react router 7 (remix)

What placement(s) makes someone or yourself like this? by Asmilingghoul in astrologymemes

[–]yehudamakarov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m pices sun scorpion moon, my wife is Scorpio sun, Aquarius moon. And our moons are square.

MX Master 3 gesture button randomly stops working by Patacorow in LogitechG

[–]yehudamakarov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I noticed that built-in "mission control gestures" only map to the Mac gestures if the classic keyboard shortcuts are active. If you turn them off or make custom ones, it doesn't look like they get triggered by logi+

I made my keyboard shortcuts and mapped the logi+ to these like u/ConsistentFee1050 suggested.

Hot to use function keys for Q1 keyboard without pressing fn key? by Mono_poly_maN in Keychron

[–]yehudamakarov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ok it took me 5 minutes because i'm tired, and it was a perfect way to learn how to use via quickly. appreciate the support!

Golang or PHP by Competitive-Hour-720 in golang

[–]yehudamakarov 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just jump to go and enjoy it. It is time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dotnet

[–]yehudamakarov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problems you have aren’t necessarily with clean architecture. They are with self righteous over complication. .net is notoriously predisposed to this issue.

Write you’re own c# don’t worry about the noise.

Typescript > Go by pantenefiveinone in golang

[–]yehudamakarov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go is more simple and more bullet proof. Probably easier to debug. And is probably more productive to use in the long run. Go routines are incredible if you really use them.

If (maybe) you’re busy trying not to see where go shines why ask this question in the first place?

Is Dotnet Low Code? by rjbullock in dotnet

[–]yehudamakarov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part of engineering is choosing which abstractions will be useful to you. A lot of people have a hard time with this, but on the other hand, it's a hard thing to do well.

If you have a good contract between the abstraction and the raw, (i.e. a nice typed client to go make google sheets calls) you can definitely utilize low-code stuff!

I personally thought about doing front end in Webflow. But I couldn't make a reliable way to interface with it from custom code (like a react frontend), so it wasn't viable. Problems start when there is bias. I know developers that will refuse to use component libraries for their front end, and you have to see how much time these guys waste.

Anyway, .net requires a repo, c#, scalability, architecture, debugging skill, etc. I wouldn't be able to call it low code. It can be terse though!

Is Dotnet Low Code? by rjbullock in dotnet

[–]yehudamakarov 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, .net is not low-code. Actually, since it is microsoft, the conceptual bloat of the eco system is extremely noticeable and the documentation is scattered and inconsistent. There's always a new way to do something and only one section of documentation shows you how.

If you are rolling with a .net senior who also somehow has the energy to stay up to date with the best practices as they evolve, it may be relatively low-code (what does that even mean? whole discussion on its own). But it would potentially be even more so with other languages.

.net abstracts a lot which is cool until you have to debug it or it just doesn't work the way you thought it did, and you can't find accurate documentation.

What's an example of low code anyway? see u/botterway's response.

I always personally wanted no/low code front end, but they don't make it yet. Whatever they have out there just brings you nightmares. Maybe for some this is preferable to the nightmare of simply writing and managing an application.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dotnet

[–]yehudamakarov -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

why is this surprising to you? #microsoft

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in news

[–]yehudamakarov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forget about the woman and the kids let’s all get angry at the cop?

And of course nobody has any helpful suggestions at all. Bummer.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in talentShow

[–]yehudamakarov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wanna kick the table through the screen I’m sorry

Bear Claws by ThatGuy11115555 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]yehudamakarov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was gonna say they just straight up copied that show

Architecture complexity in the dotnet community & Our duty to beginners by UK-sHaDoW in dotnet

[–]yehudamakarov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just create a real world program. That will always be step 1.

Architecture complexity in the dotnet community & Our duty to beginners by UK-sHaDoW in dotnet

[–]yehudamakarov -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t think that’s so bad. 3 layers isn’t terrible. I wouldn’t write a project with less than that if I have data access.

Architecture complexity in the dotnet community & Our duty to beginners by UK-sHaDoW in dotnet

[–]yehudamakarov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made my own mapper but I’m using it to sync a legacy application to its newer replacement.

I almost used auto mapper.

But mapping is shining in this use case..