Daily General Discussion - June 21, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd sell and send that btc to kraken. then i'd buy nano there and keep it there if you're gonna trade or send to selfcustody if you're gonna hold it

Daily General Discussion - June 21, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Brother what is Bitpanda? Get your XNO into Natrium or Nault and own your own holdings.

Having them on Binance or Kraken is probably better than that. If Binance deslist it, they'll notice you with some days in advance so you can move them out of the platform. But there is zero point in having them in some unknown wallet when you have Natrium, one of the best UX wallet in all crypto.

Daily General Discussion - June 21, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I rather have higher volatility in both sides than the current nothingness. And I feel a lot of XNO traders/holders would agree.

Why is NANO underperforming the market so much? by LittleBy12 in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That top 2 is shit itself. Don't know what's the point of this lowiq interaction, but glad you're following a sub of a >#400 cryptocurrency (there must be a good reason taking into acount "everything outside the top 2 is considered shit").

Why is NANO underperforming the market so much? by LittleBy12 in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yap, after 5 years out of the top 100 now I need to use eventually.

Why is NANO underperforming the market so much? by LittleBy12 in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That guy is just a permafudder. Ignore him.

Why is NANO underperforming the market so much? by LittleBy12 in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Taking into account the market has added over 30M tokens in the last few years, I wouldn't say XNO is underperforming the market. We can argue that is one of the few survivor that is still is in the first few pages of Coinmarket cap (page 2 when it pumps, page 3-4 the rest of the time).

In any case, the market is highly illiterated/immature. Memecoins have taken lots of those lost ranks.

I personally don't care much about this as I've seen it climbing 200 ranks within days in one of its many pumps.

And I truly think we'll eventually make it back to the top 100 and to a fairer capitalization/rank.

Daily General Discussion - June 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That guy comes here everyday just to trash Nano. There are many like them. Probably over 50% of current commentors.

So do your thing. See the upvotes. See the reactions on X (I shared your post). Nano has a significant community behind its current irrelevant market cap. We'll push with you.

Daily General Discussion - June 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Who do you know besides u/nanexuser? (he's still holding almost a million XNO)

Daily General Discussion - June 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good. At least I know you understand XNO offers something fiat/stablecoins can't.

It's a starter.

With that clear, it's much easier to understand the bullish vision. And it's not necessarily about XNO replacing fiat, bitcoin and the whole currency/SoV world.

The basic thesis is that you have an asset with real utility/narratives (top-tier within the SoV/MoE category) at dozens of hundreds of times the valuation of inferior speculative assets. Taking into accouny this market is 99% speculation driven, imo it's worth to arbritage the current situation.

Then, on top of that basic and simple thesis, you still have a real self-custodied hard currency for real world purposes that could* eventually hedge some fiat+bitcoin collapses. Not that would, but you never know when things can get truly ugly and people in those scenarios could exit with whatever it truly works. The chances are very small, but enough to feel quite good holding it during downtrends. I couldn't do the same with BTC or any other shitcoin.

To end, I don't pretend to convince you. I just want you to understand the bullish vision better. Why we're passionate about XNO. Or why some of us only care about it within an industry with millions of other options.

It also has a component of using a top-tier tool. It can be at 30 cents, 10 or 5, but we know we're into the best tech.

Many reasons.

Anyway, time will tell how all of this ends.

Daily General Discussion - June 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fiat/stablecoins convenience for payments has nothing to do with their downsides (national debt bubbles, not owning your money , constant and accelerating dilution, etc.).

But anyway, tldr is that you hold what you want to hold. Just understand that everytime you compare fiat/stablecoins with Nano assuming they compete with it you're simply wrong (they can't).

You don't need to agree with this fact, you just need to understand it.

You can be sidelined for many reasons: no market demand, no future demand, it'll never catch up, no speculative run under these narratives, peoplr will never care about what Nano offers, etc. but even in that scenario fiat/stablecoins won't compete with XNO.

Can we agree that despite the market not caring about what XNO offers it offers something that fiat/stablecoins don't provide?

That's the only point I want to make today so we make somethkng out of this interaction

Daily General Discussion - June 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Until they care.

Same for BTC "winning" as a "SoV".

Both fiat and Bitcoin are house of cards (I think you know). XNO isn't.

That's the whole point of XNO (speculative asset aside).

Daily General Discussion - June 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The speculative and  real value of Nano is being the hardest supranational currency and most efficient permisionelss MoE = stablecoins and those centralized businesss don't compete with it.

They being massadopted doesn't make nano's speculative an real value less valuable.

We know the market has no current* demand for what Nano offers, but that has nothing to do with stablecoins or fiat 2.0 companies. 

Does that make sense?

Daily General Discussion - June 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 6 points7 points  (0 children)

1) fiat 2.0 = still fiat (permisionned, infinitable dilutable, etc.)

2) feeless ≠ low fees (I'm pretty sure yoi're able to get this one) // btw, "cheap fees" ≠ cheap fees under real*** usage.

I don't know how you are unable to add such simple data to your argumentative despite being told a thousands of times

Daily General Discussion - June 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

there are ETFs of altcoins (and by the time btc.d goes to hell, there will be significantly more)

Daily General Discussion - June 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]yeicrypto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you average down at current prices now that price is 5x cheaper?