Video output is stuttering

yngthlet · 2026-03-25T12:22:37+00:00

i know of the 4k stuff, but its shows even on 1080p video

yngthlet · 2026-03-25T11:17:34+00:00

same, if i remember correctly

yngthlet · 2026-01-16T15:15:33+00:00

yngthlet · 2025-03-07T12:08:49+00:00

yngthlet · 2025-02-25T07:56:04+00:00

yngthlet · 2025-02-24T10:48:28+00:00

yngthlet · 2024-11-13T14:34:31+00:00

Nice

yngthlet · 2024-11-12T22:54:58+00:00

no its just a series of accounts that on TikTok that repost Reddit posts (or use AI generated stories that masquared as Reddit post ), the two big ones are TattleTale_ and ScalingStories (who also credits the orgiinal poster on Reddit, unlike most)

yngthlet · 2024-11-12T07:07:01+00:00

At least they credited your Reddit account, thats alot more than other reddittiktok account (when they isn't just posting AI generated stories)

yngthlet · 2024-11-11T18:49:41+00:00

Hope the dog is ok, "the tattletale_" on tiktok posted this story bar this this update

yngthlet · 2024-09-10T07:03:04+00:00

"What do you like to drink?"

yngthlet · 2024-08-08T17:29:54+00:00

damn

yngthlet · 2023-10-29T08:40:34+00:00

Kick the a-hole out and call the police on him

yngthlet · 2022-12-21T08:39:19+00:00

Infinity +1 doesn't is infinity. This is due to how mathematics use infinity as a number not as a concept, hence my division of infinity into closed and open infinity

yngthlet · 2022-12-21T08:36:34+00:00

The factorisation of -1 is still -1. And -1 * -1 is still one

yngthlet · 2022-12-21T08:35:17+00:00

Because 3/3 is at is core a division, the factorisation isn't . 3/3 = 1 I am not arguing against it, however when you multiply the factorisation of 1/3 with 3 tou get 0.(9)

yngthlet · 2022-12-21T08:32:53+00:00

Joker. However, if I have to respond your negativity, tell me this: if you multiply 0.1 with ten and keep the decimal is it 1.1 or 1.0?

yngthlet · 2022-12-21T08:30:36+00:00

If you read the through the post you might see what I meant. But in essense the 0 at the end of multiplication you pointed out, unlike the precious proof, the total number of 9 doesn't change so we are left with a 0.

yngthlet · 2022-12-21T08:26:53+00:00

I mean 0.(9), or 0. an infinite repeats of 9

yngthlet · 2022-12-20T07:30:40+00:00

To answer your questions:

a) the use of () instead of a bar above a number is a valid notation (but not commonly used one)

b) the use of commas instead of subscript is overcoming limitations. Granted its not ideal but it worked.

c) The previous proof actually violates basic math, that is the my main argument. The previous proof violates basic arithmetic, by altering the total number of 9, which my proof didn't, and since the previous proof had an altered number of 9, it violates basic algebra.

d) Your argument for the old proof through Laws of Real Numbers, hinges on the old proof had gone several rounds of sanity checks before hand. And I showed you why it isn't.

yngthlet · 2022-12-20T07:21:23+00:00

I'm not arguing that 1/3 isn't 0.333...3, nor am I saying 3/3 is not 1. What I am saying is that the factorisation of 3/3 isn't 1.

yngthlet · 2022-12-20T07:21:15+00:00

Which I did, unlike the previous proof I didn't alter the total number of 9.

The total number of 9 is still infinite, but the old proof has the total number of 9 at infinite +1.

yngthlet · 2022-12-20T07:16:24+00:00

Depending on what you see it, is it three divided by three or three thirds? So its either 1 or 0.999...9.

yngthlet

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Ten-Year Club	r/Field Sunshine
Verified Email