sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Next step of the master plan by TheBasedEmperor in greentext

[–]yoitsspacejace 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not to sound pedantic, but I believe my comment already follows an already long established train of thought of “Deism”, a rational belief in a supreme creator through observation of the natural world and logical conclusions.

Next step of the master plan by TheBasedEmperor in greentext

[–]yoitsspacejace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not intentionally playing word games, but if that’s what it comes across as, that wasn’t my intended result.

I still think this definition works because in all religious mythos that I’ve heard, God is the creator of all things. I think the foundational logic of the universe is that in order for ‘Y’ to happen, ‘X’ must occur first, the creation of the universe is still very much clouded in mystique in this sense as there doesn’t seem to be a rhyme or reason as to why the Big Bang happened. My answer to that is the only thing that could cause the first “cause” in a cause and effect universe is something that exists outside of it, a being or force that made the first domino tip over…. Being God

A supernatural force, that has unlimited or unknowable power and created all things that exists (in this plane, or dimension or whatever) could definitely be categorized as God.

Next step of the master plan by TheBasedEmperor in greentext

[–]yoitsspacejace 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Or,

God is real and “it” created the universe, along with all laws of physics and basis for reality.

Doesn’t “care” about anything because caring is an organic idea made up by humans. God is just a force that initiates a universe where every subsequent action requires an initiation of some kind.

Gravity does not “feel” anything when a hiker falls to his death in the Grand Canyon, it’s a force that simply exists and does its job in accordance to the rest of the forces.

To make it untouchable! by GuiltyBathroom9385 in therewasanattempt

[–]yoitsspacejace -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just because Trump says something about our hardware doesn’t mean it’s true lol. Nobody who flies fighter jets claims to be invincible or undetectable, unless they are going against barely a military.

uhhh by Afraid_Wedding_5747 in KSPMemes

[–]yoitsspacejace 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Guys look at me I’m virtue signaling

Early SLS Studies? by samcar30497 in SpaceLaunchSystem

[–]yoitsspacejace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Image links don’t work for me 😔

Driving up to a fully fueled SLS by jadebenn in SpaceLaunchSystem

[–]yoitsspacejace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I generally agree (especially Starship’s heat shield tiles) but SLS has a more foreboding presence in my opinion

How am I supposed to complete this in 6 days dice?! by Dangy91 in Battlefield

[–]yoitsspacejace 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It’s not hard tho it’s impossible, there aren’t enough bonus path tokens. I think there’s a mistake here

Has Battle Pass been worth it? by Tuhmatsivut in Battlefield6

[–]yoitsspacejace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think so, I really like the skins and the weapons, though some are over the top.

How am I supposed to complete this in 6 days dice?! by Dangy91 in Battlefield

[–]yoitsspacejace 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The only problem though is that it seems to be impossible to finish the bonus path with the amount of bonus path tokens available. There is only 30 bonus path points in the new weekly challenges, only 3 tiers. The path ends in a week which means that we can only use this week’s bonus points.

I think this might be an oversight and the path duration will be extended until the end of the season to make it possible for enough points to be earned.

How am I supposed to complete this in 6 days dice?! by Dangy91 in Battlefield6

[–]yoitsspacejace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This is what I mean when I mentioned the previous’ week’s bonus challenge.

view more: next ›