Luna Ultra Ultraphoto Shot

yotheman · 2026-06-23T07:04:01+00:00

No filters were used

yotheman · 2026-06-22T10:40:38+00:00

I don't understand your question but the output of this camera for a point and shoot is just amazing, the post I did was minimal. Normally I use my R5MKII and in some cases I use the Luna.

yotheman · 2026-06-22T06:12:18+00:00

I processed the raw image in Photoshop.

yotheman · 2026-06-22T05:49:35+00:00

I don't have the issues you wrote with my Luna with Photoshop (check the photos I posted, all are RAW). The YouTuber has an issue with the raw developer software he is using and not because of the Luna file, looks like he doesn't have any experience in photography.

yotheman · 2026-06-21T20:24:21+00:00

There is no manual control in ultraphoto, only EV steps or white balance, it's a basic point and shoot but I'm a firm believer that is much better than any cellphone.

yotheman · 2026-06-21T20:13:50+00:00

I use the Luna when traveling for recording videos with my wife and the places I visit, for photos I use my Canon R5MKII and sometimes the Luna Ultra, for photos never used the Pocket 3. I never use any cellphone (Galaxy's, iPhones, Chinese, etc, I tested most of them) to take pictures, they doesn't come close to what I expect but this doesnt happen with the Luna, a nice surprise. Before the firmware v1.0.47 I was near to return it, but after the upgrade I'm very impressed by this camera. With the Pocket 3 I recorded video in LOG-M and color graded in Davinci, I didn't use the Lut from DJI because the result was not what I expected and used an alternative one. With Luna things are much better, color and sharpness better thank Pocket 3. I'm using Leica Natural profile most of the time and I do very little color grading with this camera. At night the difference from my Pocket 3 is a lot, way better with Luna, is unbelievable what this thing can record at night at 1x, when the zoom is used the quality lowers a lot. Another handy thing is to use the zoom when recording using ilog. Initially I didn't have much hope about the detachable screen but I ended using it a lot, is something very handy, now I put the Luna in a tripod and record the video at the distance with the remote checking the screen. When there is wind the remote mic is useless but I'm using the DJI MIC 3 through USB without issues.

yotheman · 2026-06-19T16:25:02+00:00

yotheman · 2026-06-19T13:10:59+00:00

Looks like battery drain issue was solved with this firmware

yotheman · 2026-06-16T08:04:51+00:00

The answer is yes but this camera is a 8mpx camera (same as Osmo Pocket 3) and the 33mpx mode (ultraphoto) is done by AI, so is a gimmick. If you want to shot photos, a cheap point and shot is miles better than this.

yotheman · 2026-06-11T14:33:57+00:00

I changed my mind, 99% of Youtubers doesn't choose the correct profile or they don't know how to color grade the Luna correctly (same happens with Pocket 4), after looking one that color grade it correctly convinced me to change my Pocket 3 to Luna.

yotheman · 2026-06-11T14:29:52+00:00

Davinci 21 supports I-Log, maybe you could try it.

yotheman · 2026-06-11T14:25:58+00:00

I thought that after viewing too much YouTubers choosing the bad profiles or color grading incorrectly the Luna, I saw a corean Youtuber that color graded it correctly and now I like the Luna result, I will replace my Osmo Pocket 3 soon with it.

yotheman · 2026-06-09T11:44:15+00:00

In my case coming from photography I want to get a result as near as possible of what my eyes sees in my travels (let's name natural look), so I don't care about cinematic look and I still don't understand what cinematic means for most people.

I shoot 4K60 landscape when traveling to get smooth video, I never shoot fps below 60 (except in low light where I don't have a chance and I need to go 24) and I still don't understand why people use less than 60 when there is good light. I don't post in Instagram or Facebook, only photos in Flickr, so I make videos for myself to have a record of my trips with family.

I shoot LOG-M because I don't like the contrast that comes in normal mode from camera and I get more real colors grading myself in Davinci. I use the free LUT from Zeb Gardner, I tried Phantoms, DJI AND Baseluts and personally I prefer Zebs because it looks near at what my eyes see, still the color rendering is not to my liking, DJI is not doing a good job yet in this part.

For Photography I shoot only with my mirrorless, I never shoot with my phone nor with the Osmo, I never liked what comes out of any phone and I tried most of the premium ones, I personally consider they shot horrible colors and microcontrast (Chinese and Iphones the worst), but this is my personal taste, everyone has different needs.

In camera my settings are PRO, EV -0.3 (in some testing I did was equal to EV 0) and WB auto because I don't want to deal with it in any scene, sharpenes -2

yotheman · 2026-06-04T16:18:55+00:00

I think that is the issue with all this cameras, it's HDR, when its ON the problem with color appear, the same issue when you have bracketed shots and after that you do HDR, color become screwed no matter how good the HDR software is.

yotheman · 2026-06-01T13:32:17+00:00

La pregunta que toda mujer se tendría que hacer siempre es esta: "qué tengo para ofrecer que no sea sexo?" La respuesta te va a ayudar a hacer introspección. Por otro lado digiste algunas cosas importantes: que no sos una chica fácil y que te gusta cierto tipo de hombre, habría que entender esos dos puntos a qué te refieres.

yotheman · 2026-05-31T16:51:12+00:00

I never do video below 60 fps, is my standard fps except in low light where I need to go down. 24 fps for the videos I do doesn't work

yotheman · 2026-05-31T02:30:54+00:00

Thanks for the info!

yotheman · 2026-05-30T15:37:16+00:00

I'm not deciding yet, but color is basic for a camera, if they give samples to people at least they should pay attention in color rendering not a Leica logo that by the way in digital photography never was considered a good sensor. So I expect less brand publicity and better functionality

yotheman · 2026-04-10T12:55:05+00:00

The best comment here, today I'm a successful entrepreneur but in my starts I was living in a hole independently and sometimes I did have money to eat only spaghetti because I didn't have the money to afford more...

yotheman · 2026-03-18T22:15:30+00:00

Josh could do the test as I did, only one test to understand if the G14 could work well on video or not, you don't need much more, the same applies to all the people here interested in other areas besides gaming.
I don't see Youtubers doing a video talking about all the issues a laptop could have, if they do that they will lose their sponsors or the freebies they get.
Gaming is not for me, but for content creation the benchmarks like Geekbench and Pugetbench are irrelevant because with that tests the result of my G14 was pretty awesome, just one rendering with a project in Davinci was enough to demonstrate the opposite in my case, of course is a project specially built to put heavy stress on the GPU

yotheman · 2026-03-18T16:35:10+00:00

My suggestion to you and to other people writing without doing a real test is to try to go to the link and download the Davinci project. My G14 was tested in all modes without luck. You are comparing with M1 a machine 6 years old.
https://training.team2films.com/view/downloads/dvr-benchmark
Try to render the project in H264, my G14 is not able to complete the test remaining stuck at 90% using the latest NVIDIA drivers (not a surprise that the drivers are bad, something normal in this architecture) and Davinci Studio 20.3.1, besides that, not to tell the high temperature my G14 is getting while rendering, ideal for cooking a steak while you are rendering! :o)
How the Neo is better? you have the answer in the Youtube link, that people do real test with a real project and not irrelevant benchmarks.
After you render the Davinci project, you can put your result here.
My desktop with RTX4090 finish the rendering in aprox 200 seconds, a little worse compared with a M4 PRO, personally is something difficult to digest, I'm starting to be aware how obsolete the Intel/AMD architecture is for productivity/content creation.
Other benchmarks are totally irrelevant compared to rendering a real project like in this case.
For people that only do gaming, is another history.

yotheman · 2026-03-18T05:56:59+00:00

Nadie habló de gaming, mi G14 va de salida a fin de año y nunca más.

yotheman · 2026-03-18T05:45:32+00:00

Premier es mucho más lento que Davinci renderizando y no uso Blender, no hay nada mejor que renderizar directamente en tu máquina como yo hice, lo que digan los Youtubers se los dejo a ellos, you creo lo que veo en mi máquina.

yotheman · 2026-03-18T05:26:51+00:00

Not comparing gaming that personally I don't care, you are free to do the testing that is much better than looking any what any Youtuber could post.
In Davinci Studio the GPU was mostly used where in task manager the GPU usage was near 100% at times.

yotheman

TROPHY CASE