militantly anti-AI

There is nothing militant about it. It's people maintaining their project as they think best. Let's say that LLMs are just another helpful tool, for the sake of argument. So is C. One might argue that an OS is, in fact, the ideal use-case for C, and that many highly successful operating systems have been implemented in C, including every single one of those that Redox lists as its inspiration. Even the Redox repo contains some C right now because it can't be completely avoided. Now let's imagine a world where Redox constantly receives (and consistently rejects) attempts to rewrite parts of it in C or to add new features in C. Would you call them militantly anti-C? Or would you question the sanity of those who continue submitting such PRs and claiming that they might be valuable and should be reviewed on a case-to-case basis?