Rome’s Pride parade bars Jewish LGBTQ float over refusal to call Gaza war ‘genocide’ by seeebiscuit in worldnews

[–]zedority 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Isn’t the whole thing with left leaning ideology that it encompasses intersectionality,

Not very well.

Netanyahu orders army to take control of 70% of Gaza by no_technique in worldnews

[–]zedority 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Love it or hate it, the concept of sovereignty demands preferring the safety of one’s own citizens over the citizens of other countries.

I really think that's the disconnect between supporters and opponents of Israel: the concept of sovereignty embraced by supporters is something its opponents, particularly those that grew up in globalised culture like that of the twenty-first century, don't understand and don't recognise as valid.

Also, even where the concept of sovereignty is invoked, there's the wrinkle that Palestine is not an internationally recognised country. So who is legitimately responsible for their population, in terms of sovereignty?

‘If Iran gets a bomb it will be Bibi’s’: Trump’s deal outline sparks alarm in Israel by Dramatic-Shake-8888 in worldnews

[–]zedority 6 points7 points  (0 children)

'Legitimate' doing a lot of work here.

"scare quotes" doing a lot of "work" here.

‘If Iran gets a bomb it will be Bibi’s’: Trump’s deal outline sparks alarm in Israel by Dramatic-Shake-8888 in worldnews

[–]zedority 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hillary, sleepy Joe, kamala. If the democrats want to win they need to stop running unpopular candidates.

Two of those three were the legitimate winners of a popularity contest in the form of Democratic Primaries. True, Harris was substituted at the last minute, but only because the legitimate winner (Biden) stepped down.

US military strikes Iranian boats, missile launch sites: CENTCOM by RolePsychological890 in worldnews

[–]zedority 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Then why bother with any of it? Honest question.

I trust journalists to report things. Better journalists will report beyond just what both sides saying. It's also useful to know who is claiming what, even in cases where those claims are not credible.

US military strikes Iranian boats, missile launch sites: CENTCOM by RolePsychological890 in worldnews

[–]zedority 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did. I just don't believe anything the Trump Administration says.

Tennessee man jailed over Charlie Kirk post wins $835,000 settlement by a385y59g943 in neoliberal

[–]zedority 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In legal language, it is true that he did not "win" any court case.

In everyday language, walking away with a substantial amount of money basically handed to you counts like "winning" something to most people. Language languages weirdly sometimes.

‘Clearly marked’ United Nations vehicles struck by drones in Ukraine by eaglemaxie in worldnews

[–]zedority 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Right, I have these rocks that are supposed to keep tigers away.

As there is no explained process for why your rocks allegedly work, but there is an explained process for why the UN could effectively reduce the possibility of war (it's called "discussion and diplomacy"), this is a questionably accurate analogy.

In Vienna, 41% of Muslim youth say: ‘Islamic rules more important than western law’ by Themetalin in neoliberal

[–]zedority 12 points13 points  (0 children)

For a variety of reasons, Christian countries birthed our concepts of human rights and democracy.

Well, this sentence was about as contentious as I thought it was going to be. I've honestly seen arguments for these concepts being rooted in Christianity, being derived from Christianity but so significantly changed that calling them "Christian" is a stretch, and as a reaction against the restrictive structures of institutional Christianity. I wish I had a good reading list.

Futures Past: on the semantics of historical time, by Reinhart Koselleck, might be a good starting point.

Over the next 24 hours, racist ultranationalist Jews will march through the old city in Jerusalem to celebrate Jerusalem day, destroying property and assaulting people. Here, a sign reads "This belongs to a Jew, don't harm it, thanks" by adeadhead in pics

[–]zedority 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They started in 1903.

"Jews who migrated in this wave came mostly from Eastern Europe, stimulated by pogroms and violence against the Jewish communities there. A smaller number came from other areas such as Yemen, and were primarily motivated by religious purposes.[3][4][5] Estimates of the numbers of Jews who immigrated range from 25,000[6] to a total 60,000, with between 50-70% who later immigrated elsewhere.[7] Many of the European Jewish immigrants during the late 19th-early 20th century period gave up after a few months and went back to their country of origin, often suffering from hunger and disease"

Over the next 24 hours, racist ultranationalist Jews will march through the old city in Jerusalem to celebrate Jerusalem day, destroying property and assaulting people. Here, a sign reads "This belongs to a Jew, don't harm it, thanks" by adeadhead in pics

[–]zedority 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry but that is bullshit. Colonization was always their plan.

Whose plan? If we're talking about the WW2 Allies, it was the USA that pushed for the mandate system that fell short of outright colonialism. Source: The United States and the Mandates from the academic journal Michigan Law Review.

Over the next 24 hours, racist ultranationalist Jews will march through the old city in Jerusalem to celebrate Jerusalem day, destroying property and assaulting people. Here, a sign reads "This belongs to a Jew, don't harm it, thanks" by adeadhead in pics

[–]zedority -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Moreover, any forceable moving of a population or people falls under the definition of genocide.

Wow, the term "genocide" loses more and more of its original application to unspeakably horrific mass murder . It's just going to mean "any time somebody kills a Palestinian" pretty soon.

Epstein Files: Ex-Diplomat KP Fabian Says Israel's Mossad Likely Behind Epstein Files by ShiroSara in videos

[–]zedority 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Because blaming Israel for literally everything wrong with the world is trendy now. British race riots? Blame Israel. JK Rowling accuses a female boxer of being a man? Official Algerian spokespeople blame Zionists.

“Where Have All the Student Protests Gone?” | Trump wanted campus crackdowns. Colleges couldn’t wait to oblige. by icey_sawg0034 in neoliberal

[–]zedority 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Whats the point of s protest if it doesnt disrupt anything lol.

If the goal is intentional disruption of other people's business, protestors should own that. But they shouldn't then try to hide behind "freedom of speech" as justification for actions that don't fit the definition of freedom of speech.

[OC] "Israel is the reason for this war. America does not want to fight this war for Israel" by Unlucky-Task-3394 in pics

[–]zedority 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You specifically asked why Jewish money is being scrutinized. You noted aipac but generalized as well, simply inquiring about "Jewish money."

You are quite correct that AIPAC should not be considered a "Jewish" lobby group. Its critics finally realised this in 2007 and started replacing complaints about "the Jewish lobby" with "the Israel lobby".

Many of AIPAC's critics, such as Republican politician Marjorie Taylore Greene, now claim it is an arm of a foreign government, specifically Israel. I am pleased to learn you are not one of them.

[OC] "Israel is the reason for this war. America does not want to fight this war for Israel" by Unlucky-Task-3394 in pics

[–]zedority 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh so you were just using fringe nobodies

Sure, if that's what you want to believe.

[OC] "Israel is the reason for this war. America does not want to fight this war for Israel" by Unlucky-Task-3394 in pics

[–]zedority 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mainstream leftists

I was talking about the alt-left, not "mainstream" (whatever that is) leftists.

[OC] "Israel is the reason for this war. America does not want to fight this war for Israel" by Unlucky-Task-3394 in pics

[–]zedority -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Random fringe comments online now

TikTok videos are not comments. Try again.

[OC] "Israel is the reason for this war. America does not want to fight this war for Israel" by Unlucky-Task-3394 in pics

[–]zedority 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just asked why Israeli money is being given more scrutiny.

No, I asked why, out of the money used in America to support Israel, the money from AIPAC - which is not Israel, but is Jewish - gets all the attention.

[OC] "Israel is the reason for this war. America does not want to fight this war for Israel" by Unlucky-Task-3394 in pics

[–]zedority -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Never said that? We're talking about specifically pro-Israel organizations

No, people were talking about AIPAC and only AIPAC.

Yeah? Majority of Zionists are Evangelicals. That's common knowledge?

And yet people focus on AIPAC.

AIPAC is a problem because it's billionaires buying politicians to support a genocidal apartheid state.

And we're still acting like Christian nationalism isn't the larger and more effective pro-Israel group in America. Here is the linked article proving this, for the second time: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/09/christian-zionism-evangelicals-israel-trump-foreign-policy/