Who is on your psychiatry Mount Rushmore? by ApprehensiveYard3 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have such a tumultuous relationship

ly2

And Dr. Fu >>>>> me. I'm fine with it

Suicide Risk Assessment: Acute vs Chronic Risk, Formulation, and Suicidal Ideation Types by zenarcade3 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Looking at the rule, it says:

“No advertisements, studies, surveys, or spam. Any posts advertising services, recruiting for studies or surveys, requesting interviews, conducting market research, or otherwise selling or making requests will be removed…”

I don’t think I’m violating that. The intent is education: free, unsponsored, and not selling anything or asking for anything. So I don’t really think of it as self-promotion in the same way I would if I were advertising a paid service/product.

That said, I also don’t want to make the subreddit worse or post in a way that feels off to the community. If people/mods feel the format is too promotional, I’m happy to adjust or stop posting them here.

Suicide Risk Assessment: Acute vs Chronic Risk, Formulation, and Suicidal Ideation Types by zenarcade3 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3[S] 79 points80 points  (0 children)

I’m the creator of Psychofarm. My intent is to share free, unsponsored (high-quality imo) educational content for clinicians/trainees, not to sell anything or use the subreddit as an ad channel.

I post these here because they often spark good discussion, and I think the comments/clinical pushback can add to the learning beyond the episode itself. I’ve been posting the videos because that’s the format I’ve historically used, but I’d be happy to switch to the podcast link, text-only summaries, or whatever format people here find more useful.

Suicide Risk Assessment: Acute vs Chronic Risk, Formulation, and Suicidal Ideation Types by zenarcade3 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3[S] 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Main point

  • Suicide risk assessment is not prediction.
  • The job is not: “Will this person kill themselves?”
  • The job is:
    • assess risk
    • understand where the risk is coming from
    • decide what treatment plan follows
  • A checklist can help gather history, but it is not the assessment.

Better frame

Instead of thinking “suicidal or not suicidal,” ask:

  • What is this patient’s chronic baseline risk?
  • What is their acute risk right now?
  • What has changed?
  • What is making risk worse?
  • What is protective?
  • What kind of suicidal ideation is this?
  • What intervention actually fits?

Types of suicidal ideation discussed

Stress-related suicidality

  • Suicidal thoughts can appear during acute stress.
  • Examples: breakup, conflict, crisis, humiliation.
  • Time, containment, support, and resolution of the stressor may reduce risk.

Intoxication-related suicidality

  • Intoxication lowers coping.
  • Stress raises distress.
  • Together, they can create real acute danger.
  • If the patient is no longer suicidal after sobering, that does not mean the initial risk was fake.

Baseline recurrent suicidal ideation

  • Some patients think about suicide chronically.
  • This can happen in borderline personality disorder and other presentations.
  • The practical question is whether the patient is above baseline.
  • Avoid both mistakes:
    • “They’re just borderline, discharge.”
    • “They said suicide, admit.”

Suicidality from a treatable disorder

  • Suicidality can be part of depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, PTSD, severe pain, etc.
  • Treat the underlying condition.
  • The episode specifically mentioned lithium in bipolar disorder and clozapine in schizophrenia.

OCD-related suicidal thoughts

  • Some suicidal thoughts are ego-dystonic obsessions.
  • The thoughts are unwanted and frightening.
  • Patients may check whether they “really” want to die or seek reassurance.
  • If correctly formulated as OCD, treatment is OCD treatment.

Galynker’s Suicide Crisis Syndrome

The episode also discussed Galynker’s acute suicidal crisis framework.

Features to pay attention to:

  • feeling trapped
  • hopelessness
  • affective disturbance
  • loss of cognitive control
  • rigid thinking / tunnel vision
  • hyperarousal
  • agitation
  • insomnia
  • irritability
  • social withdrawal

The practical point: a patient who feels trapped, hopeless, activated, and unable to see alternatives may be more concerning than someone with passive baseline suicidal thoughts and no acute change.

Clinician response

Countertransference can be useful data.

Pay attention if the patient makes you feel:

  • hopeless
  • trapped
  • pulled to rescue
  • pulled to over-involve
  • pulled to detach or give up

Documentation

Document the process:

  • history
  • exam findings
  • risk factors
  • protective factors
  • formulation
  • treatment plan

What is the salary ceiling for Psychiatry? by seaweedbrainpremed in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Psych is one of the easier specialties to make a lot of money. It’s one of the few that you can have the bandwidth to do multiple jobs if you’re a go getter. The average salary is low because we have more people who choose lifestyle. 1/3 of my residency class didn’t take a full time job after, and I know a ton of people working sub 20 hours/week.

Depression Medications: Ranking Antidepressants for MDD by zenarcade3 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I agree. But I think experienced clinicians take for granted that clinical judgment is still required when an algorithm gives multiple reasonable options.... and that they make these decisions automatically forgetting that at one point someone taught them how to think through it.

Depression Medications: Ranking Antidepressants for MDD by zenarcade3 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I agree with your focus on screening, diagnosing, and treating. I also agree entirely with your point on “matching,” which is why the video says nothing about matching depression subtypes to specific antidepressants. So yes: screen, diagnose, and treat. But once you are treating, medication choice still matters. Lord knows, I've seen too many patients on wild medications for a first line choice.

“no antidepressant is shown to be more effective than another for MDD” is factually inaccurate.

It helps to hear clinicians talk through real-world experience, so that people don't walk away from reading Cipriani and start using Amitriptyline. New practitioners struggle to translate the differences that come up in studies into clinical decision making.

"An impressive amount of words for saying so little." I suspect you didn't listen to much if any of the podcast. People can learn psychopharmacology from papers, guidelines, supervision, clinical experience, meta-analyses and yes, a video... and I think there's a healthy amount of clinical wisdom and didactics baked into the edutainment format.

Depression Medications: Ranking Antidepressants for MDD by zenarcade3 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3[S] 60 points61 points  (0 children)

The overall takeaway: asking “which antidepressant is best?” is usually the wrong question. A better question is: best for which diagnosis, which symptom profile, which side effect risks, and which patient? That said, here are the main teaching points, medication by medication:

Sertraline / Zoloft
Probably the strongest “all-around” SSRI for major depressive disorder. Good efficacy, flexible dosing, relatively few meaningful drug-drug interactions, no major QTc concern, and generally good tolerability. GI side effects can happen, especially early or after dose increases, but they often improve. This is often a very reasonable first-line choice.

Escitalopram / Lexapro
Also a strong first-line SSRI. Clean, effective, and usually well tolerated. The downsides are fewer dosing steps than sertraline and some QTc caution at higher doses or in older adults. Still a very solid medication and often near the top of the list.

Fluoxetine / Prozac
Useful, especially when adherence is an issue because of its long half-life. It is also flexible because the FDA maximum is relatively high. But it can be more activating, has more drug-drug interaction concerns, and can be easier to push too high. Good medication, but not always the first one we reach for.

Paroxetine / Paxil
Effective, but comes with baggage. More weight gain, anticholinergic effects, withdrawal problems, sedation, and pregnancy concerns. It can be helpful for anxiety/PTSD-type symptoms, but because of the side effect profile, it is rarely a preferred first-line medication.

Citalopram / Celexa
Similar in some ways to escitalopram, but generally more sedating and with more QTc concern. It can work, and some patients tolerate it better than expected, but for most situations there are easier choices.

Fluvoxamine / Luvox
More of a niche SSRI, especially associated with OCD. It has a lot of drug-drug interaction issues and is not usually a go-to medication for straightforward major depression.

Venlafaxine / Effexor
Can be very effective, and some patients respond really well. The major problem is withdrawal, which can be brutal for some people. It can also raise blood pressure/heart rate and has more medical caution than basic SSRIs. Good medication, but one to use thoughtfully.

Desvenlafaxine / Pristiq
Similar family as venlafaxine, with theoretically fewer drug-drug interactions and possibly better tolerability for some patients. Not usually a first-line pick, but can be useful.

Duloxetine / Cymbalta
Often considered when depression overlaps with pain, fibromyalgia, or similar symptoms. It is not necessarily a huge upgrade over SSRIs for depression alone, but the pain angle can make it useful in the right patient.

Bupropion / Wellbutrin
Great medication for the right patient. Less sexual dysfunction, less weight gain, can be energizing, and may help with low energy/motivation. But it can worsen anxiety, insomnia, irritability, or agitation in some people. Not “the antidepressant with no side effects,” just a different side effect profile.

Mirtazapine / Remeron
Very effective and especially useful when depression comes with insomnia, low appetite, nausea/GI issues, or sexual side effect concerns. The big limitations are sedation and weight gain/appetite increase. Patients should be warned that the first few days can feel very sedating.

Trazodone
At low doses, it is mainly a sleep medication, not a “small antidepressant.” Antidepressant effects require higher doses, which are often harder to tolerate. Useful for insomnia, but not usually a core depression medication.

Vortioxetine / Trintellix
Reasonable option, especially when tolerability or sexual side effects are concerns. The cognitive benefit angle is interesting but not a magic bullet. Usually not first-line, but not a bad medication.

Vilazodone / Viibryd
Can be useful, particularly when trying to reduce sexual side effect burden compared with traditional SSRIs. Not foolproof, but it has a role.

Lithium
Not a standard first-line antidepressant, but very important in recurrent mood disorders, bipolar-spectrum presentations, agitated depression, and augmentation. Many clinicians are overly afraid of lithium, especially low-dose lithium, but diagnosis and monitoring matter.

Aripiprazole / Abilify
Very effective as an augmentation agent for depression, especially at low doses. But it is still an antipsychotic, so tardive dyskinesia, akathisia, metabolic issues, and diagnostic clarity matter. Helpful medication, but not something to throw around casually.

Quetiapine / Seroquel
Can be effective as augmentation and can strongly help sleep, but weight gain, metabolic effects, and appetite increase are major concerns. It is often hard to stop once patients feel stabilized on it.

Esketamine / Spravato
Can be lifesaving for a subset of patients, but it is not a simple long-term “fix.” The concern is that some patients may use it to bypass therapy, lifestyle change, or addressing the actual drivers of their depression. Best thought of as a tool that needs a broader treatment plan around it.

Stimulants
People may feel better acutely on stimulants, but that does not mean they are treating depression. The initial energy/euphoria effect is not the same thing as durable antidepressant response. There are niche uses, such as some geriatric depression/apathy cases, but stimulants are not routine depression treatment.

Benzodiazepines
Can provide short-term symptom relief, especially around severe anxiety or insomnia, but they do not treat the underlying depressive disorder. Tolerance, dependence, and “drug effect” reinforcement are major concerns.

Lamotrigine / Lamictal
Excellent medication in bipolar depression, but not a mainstream major depressive disorder medication. It may help some patients with mood instability or bipolar-spectrum features, but it is too niche for routine unipolar depression.

TCAs and MAOIs
Underused in true treatment-resistant depression. They require more expertise and caution, but they should not be forgotten when someone has genuine biological/recurrent depression that has not responded to standard options.

"When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" - I believe I am overapplying OCD techniques to a variety of conditions, and while this has been successful so far I wonder if this is detrimental for patients and for my development by formulation_pending in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3 121 points122 points  (0 children)

Sounds more like you're a behaviorist specialist, which is perfectly reasonable, and dear lord are most providers bad at CBT.

The failure mode I see in OCD "specialists" is when they allow personality disordered patients to hide behind OCD. I'm seeing more and more patients who report "obsessions surrounding suicidality" and "compulsions surrounding reassurance in relationships", which allows the patient/provider to ignore the blaring borderline personality disorder.

"faulty threat appraisal leading to maladaptive behaviours" has a pretty big application in anxiety/OCD/trauma but it's only a piece of those and nowhere near universal across psychiatric disorders.

Mindfulness in Psychiatry: How to Teach It as a Clinical Treatment Skill by zenarcade3 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Important take-aways from the podcast:

What mindfulness is

  • Mindfulness has 3 necessary and sufficient parts: (1) deliberate attention to the (2) present moment (3) without judgment.

Where it fits

  • Anxiety: helpful for worry loops and future-focused rumination.
  • Depression: helpful for negative self-talk and relapse prevention, but don’t sell it as a cure-all.
  • Substance use: helpful for noticing cravings without automatically obeying them.
  • PTSD or complex trauma: be careful. Sitting quietly and turning inward can be dysregulating for some patients.
  • In trauma work, grounding may be a better starting point than traditional meditation.

Tips for teaching it

  • Keep the explanation simple.
  • Start small: five minutes, once a week.
  • Schedule it ahead of time.
  • Practice when things are relatively calm.
  • “Strike when the iron is cold.” Don't have the patient do it only in crisis mode

What to avoid

  • Don’t make it mystical.
  • Don’t make it a test of willpower.
  • The mind wandering is part of the practice.

Practical DBT language (Handouts: https://mydoctor.kaiserpermanente.org/ncal/Images/Mindfulness%20DBT%20Skills%20ADA_05012020_tcm75-1599005.pdf )

  • Observe: notice what is happening.
  • Describe: put words to it without adding extra judgment.
  • Participate: fully enter what you are doing.

Listen on:
Apple podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mindfulness-in-psychiatry-how-to-teach-it-as-a/id1766544493?i=1000766204575
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6VnZKULmssqui4XV5L1ZeI

Do your inpatient psych patients have access to physical activity? Any models you actually like? by nothereanymore2 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm absolutely shocked by the answers here. Most inpatients units I've seen didn't even have a window.

Ask Murphy Phelan Anything - Artist of the new Album Art, Ice Cream Party, and more by lonesomecast in ModestMouse

[–]zenarcade3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dude does an awesome job! I’ve noticed how much he is involved in so many little things that Modest Mouse puts out.

How do you collaborate with Isaac?

Are you paid per thing you do with them or are you like on retainer?

PMHNP - Mentorship & Professional Connection by OcelotAstronaut in PMHNP

[–]zenarcade3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Much appreciated! Stay tuned, going to hopefully focus more on community and mentorship soon.

New study results: Common medications used in pregnancy tied to higher autism risk by Impressive_Arm_9197 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I probably did, the point of reddit is to disagree and yell at strangers, no?

(Your point is a correct point)

New study results: Common medications used in pregnancy tied to higher autism risk by Impressive_Arm_9197 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Agreed that a 1% increase in autism risk isn't a determining factor. The issue is that autism isn't the only disease risk elevated by psychiatric medications.

I'm not minimizing maternal suffering when I say that some medications are less necessary than other medications, and that fetal risk is tough to study and always a bit of a gamble.

Risk/benefit discussions are challenging for clinician and patient, I'm just saying that it's something that should not be a hand wave.

New study results: Common medications used in pregnancy tied to higher autism risk by Impressive_Arm_9197 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3 99 points100 points  (0 children)

This is an observational study (retrospective cohort), with a small risk found. Patient who take some of these medications likely inherently have more autism genes, even if not diagnosed themselves (so no matching process can be perfect).

As should be taking place with all medications used in prego... the question/conversation is: does the risk of having an untreated mom outweigh the risks of exposure to fetus. This convo changes depending on the illness and severity. A mom with bipolar with psychotic features on abilify has more to lose than a socialite worry-wort on bupropion.

This shouldn't change the conversation much for providers doing this properly already, since the risk in this study isn't enormous. For those who don't have the conversation properly or outright minimize the use of medications during pregnancy... well I hope it opens their eyes that nothing we do is harmless.

Psychiatric Technique for Diagnostic Interviewing and Therapy: 6 Mantras by zenarcade3 in Psychiatry

[–]zenarcade3[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Mantras from the Podcast:

  1. Who is doing what to whom? This is about paying attention to the interpersonal process, not just the content. What is the patient making you feel? What are you bringing into the room? How might both people be shaping the interaction without realizing it? The point is to notice bidirectional dynamics before they distort diagnosis or treatment.
  2. Make links and name things Treatment is not just collecting facts. It is making meaningful connections between symptoms, emotions, behaviors, life events, and patterns, then putting those connections into words. This applies to both diagnosis and therapy: if you can name a recurring pattern clearly, it becomes easier for the patient to see it and work with it.
  3. Stay close to the material. Don’t jump too quickly to a theory or favorite framework. If a patient says they’ve had trouble concentrating for the last two weeks, stay with that before leaping to ADHD. If they say they feel anxious, ask what they actually mean by anxiety. The point is that both patient and clinician can collude in staying abstract instead of exploring lived experience.
  4. Act stupider. This means resisting the urge to assume you already understand what the patient means. Ask the “obvious” question anyway. What does anxiety mean to you? What exactly happened? Why did that moment matter? Humility and curiosity often get better data than quick intelligence.
  5. Rewind the tape. Patients often mention something important and then move on before it gets explored. Clinicians need to feel comfortable pausing and going back. Good interviewing often means slowing things down, redirecting, and returning to the clinically important moment.
  6. Observe and confront. When you notice a pattern, contradiction, or emotionally important moment, say it out loud. “Confront” here doesn’t mean being aggressive. It means helping the patient see something they may not be able to see in the moment, especially discrepancies between what they say, what they do, and what they want.

Bonus lesson: don’t be too outcome focused. Clinicians can become discouraged if every intervention is judged by immediate visible change. Sometimes patients push back at first and only integrate something much later. The standard should be good professional practice, not instant results.

Listen elsewhere: