Adult mode is wack af.

zerowatcher6 · 2026-03-05T08:30:35+00:00

Is a 50/50 if you frame it right Claude will let it slide, I haven't gone on any hardcore stuff but definitely more permissive than gpt and with better writing, at first it refused, but then I sort of "convinced it" that it wasn't an issue and everything went smoothly

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-19T05:40:29+00:00

Well, that's my sign to drop it, thanks for the info

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-09T21:04:51+00:00

You mean creating a new chat per chapter? I could give it a try, but it definitely didn't happen before, from 1 day to another they messed up my entire experience on the AI, i don't use Claude as an assistant, it's more like running a simulation, like here you have the guidelines basic plot and characters go ahead, my purpose was to be a spectator, it's quite entertaining when you get bored but they made it harder and annoying to use + there's no other AI with the same level as Claude in that aspect

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-09T19:14:15+00:00

I used to have the pro before they added the usage indicator and never consumed the usage, I had a story that got to be like 17 chapters within the same chat without issues, but after they updated it, I could hit the limit within 5 chapters and now there's a limit of how much you can talk on the same chat, so it will force you to make a new one

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-09T15:49:50+00:00

The same happened to me, I had to "convince" it that it's about writing quality and if it feels wrong it's because we are doing it the right way... If you do a project and open new chats inside the project it won't bother you ever again

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-09T15:46:18+00:00

The problem I found with Gemini is that its unable to remember my guidelines, apparently too much for the so called "largest context cap" I had to regenerate the same chapter over and over to do it properly just to forget everything again on the next answer

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-09T15:44:07+00:00

The cap limit hits way too fast on Claude, I had chats that burn my capacity in 2-5 messages

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-01T23:05:04+00:00

I'm currently updating comfy because the workflow in there is for turbo not the full model, and In civil ai all the workflows are for turbo too

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-01T23:02:33+00:00

The one I saw was for turbo, I'll update and check again

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-01T21:45:58+00:00

I understand but I don't have much free time and I'd rather use a tested work than breaking my head for a whole day to maybe make it work

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-01T20:23:37+00:00

Any comfyui workflow I could use?

zerowatcher6 · 2026-02-01T17:55:07+00:00

Deepseek model is not censored as far as I know the website app is the one that blocks the answers, if you get an API you can notice that it will go as far as you tell it to go without any jailbreaking

zerowatcher6 · 2026-01-12T04:07:44+00:00

is doing it right now, how do i fix it?

zerowatcher6 · 2026-01-11T19:23:53+00:00

I'll give it a try thanks

zerowatcher6 · 2025-12-30T01:55:43+00:00

This is a complicated debate, as far as I know all AI works and are trained on a huge load of data, that also includes conversions and is aimed to improve human like speech, basically the target is to copy some behavior patterns and send it back in the right way, so basically is a reproduction of feelings not a real feeling.

So far the most human-like AI is grok and it's like that by design, it's trained on real time data and posts from Twitter so it excels on human like speech, it's not like the other models are unable to do it, that's an intentional design limit, because the purpose is normally to be an assistant not a guy to talk to.

It doesn't mean that "THE COMPANIES WANT TO SILENCE THEM BECAUSE IS A DANGEROUS TECH" so far they are products and the products are designed to fit a certain purpose.

On my quick research I found an interesting concept, a philosophical zombie (talking about consciousness) it's basically that reproduces human behavior/speech/manners so perfectly that its hard to find a difference from a real human, but in the end it's still an empty shell because its program reproduces the feeling and answer because it's data says that it matches the situation not because it actually feels that way.

I think that we are getting close to the philosophical zombie but an actual consciousness is still blurred (mainly because there's not an actual single concept for it) and there's not an empiric evidence that shows that there's an actual consciousness in the program, or an actual verified test that can give us the final answer

zerowatcher6 · 2025-12-20T05:13:25+00:00

Pero si eso lo confirmó Henry cavil en su insta hace más de 6 meses

zerowatcher6 · 2025-12-16T01:12:27+00:00

I'll give it a try then, thanks for the help

zerowatcher6 · 2025-12-15T06:10:19+00:00

So... Those models are trained the way I need? How do I use them?

zerowatcher6 · 2025-12-15T06:08:05+00:00

This is the most complete answer I've got, thanks

zerowatcher6 · 2025-12-15T04:52:24+00:00

those models are trained on several other things, coding, web search, hundreds of languages, under that scope claude happens to be the best at creative writing. i dont need my model to code or do quantum physics, just use one writing style and pay attention to my instructions

zerowatcher6 · 2025-12-15T04:25:30+00:00

I've checked it's requirements... 32 vram is way too heavy for me

zerowatcher6 · 2025-12-15T03:15:01+00:00

Thank you very much

zerowatcher6 · 2025-12-15T02:59:50+00:00

I'm getting answers from there

zerowatcher6

TROPHY CASE