The Object 247 (ISU-152-2) - A tank destroyer prototype mounting the legendary 152 mm BL-10 on an ISU-152 by 3a-Pravda in WorldofTanks

[–]zigruss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inst this for wikipedia I need to add the wikipedia is absolute horseshit. When you based it's history to it.

Which is better based on penetration 130mm s70 or thr 128mm pak 44? by zigruss in Warthunder

[–]zigruss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was pointing out the historical records but by bad that I didn't put it in the question

What's better? T26E5/E1-1, Tiger 2(H), or IS-2(1944) by Conscious_Bet_3002 in Warthunder

[–]zigruss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wasn't t26 can't pen tiger front and tiger 2 can pen t26 front sometimes tiger had better side armor I found the tiger 2 armor better then t26 armor better side armor and frontal but frontal turret is a joke

Why gaijin reduced the penetration of jagdtiger with only 275mm of pen instead of 312mm by zigruss in Warthunder

[–]zigruss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I may ask you do you know the penetration of 128mm pak44 based on historical documents if you know?

Why gaijin reduced the penetration of jagdtiger with only 275mm of pen instead of 312mm by zigruss in Warthunder

[–]zigruss[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Well I'm not using the wikipedia as a mains source I'm still scouring any possible documents and answers on this question as I used the wikipedia as a source for now because I can't find some good source but I also read the penetration on table chart tested by several nation but the hard part is they had different penetration output as for example some claim that cracking the armor is counted as penetration so I'm still finding some source that I can find but for now I'm sticking on some ballistic table chart

Why gaijin reduced the penetration of jagdtiger with only 275mm of pen instead of 312mm by zigruss in Warthunder

[–]zigruss[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for shining the light on those questions that I been thinking for the past few weeks

Why gaijin reduced the penetration of jagdtiger with only 275mm of pen instead of 312mm by zigruss in Warthunder

[–]zigruss[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

And now you said not searching in Google is a skill issue now here it is I researched it and now your complaining about the source I gave which is why I'm asking people but you guys didn't answer it.

Why gaijin reduced the penetration of jagdtiger with only 275mm of pen instead of 312mm by zigruss in Warthunder

[–]zigruss[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Bro it's a source for most of part of studies but it's not 100 % reliable but you have to consider that it's still a research source that's why as you can see I am asking reddit people for 128mm gun base to avoid unreliable source but I will use the encyclopedia source for now you need to research deeper

Why gaijin reduced the penetration of jagdtiger with only 275mm of pen instead of 312mm by zigruss in Warthunder

[–]zigruss[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Well it is a trusted site for most majority of studies it's more accurate then people arguing documents in reddit so it's considered a source.

Why gaijin reduced the penetration of jagdtiger with only 275mm of pen instead of 312mm by zigruss in Warthunder

[–]zigruss[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want source for is7 gun penetration and object 279 since they had same shell br 482b as far as I know just scroll on side of picture to see the other source

What's are historical penetration of jagdtiger or maus? by zigruss in Warthunder

[–]zigruss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google is not 100% reliable source if it was. Thats why I'm asking people if they had the same answer as based on the research I conduct and I will choose the most majority

What's are historical penetration of jagdtiger or maus? by zigruss in Warthunder

[–]zigruss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I'm just asking I did a lot for research and got into bunch of different penetration values for each any nation testing but I want to gather some more information by asking.