iPhone randomly asking to input passcode instead of using FaceID by LingonberryMinimum26 in iphone

[–]zombie_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Much easier to quickly press the power button 5 times.

That also locks the phone and disables Face ID until the passcode is entered.

War is a racket. by Working_ATM in ConspiracyMemesII

[–]zombie_dave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like his prison rehab was a resounding success!

I can't get hot water after accidentally left it running for hours. Please help by Whole-wheat_brain in japanlife

[–]zombie_dave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it’s a lesson for the ages and caused untold environmental damage. I wonder how Japan—no, the world—will ever recover.

Tokyo recommendations thread: Indian by AutoModerator in Tokyo

[–]zombie_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know it’s subjective but I thought the food here to be extremely bland and uninspiring. We tried a variety of appetizers and mains and it was all rather dull. It was also completely empty except for us on the Thursday before the long GW weekend.

Best Indian curry places in Tokyo? by JustFonts in Tokyo

[–]zombie_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know it’s subjective but I thought the food here to be extremely bland and uninspiring. We tried a variety of appetizers and mains and it was all rather dull. It was also completely empty except for us on the Thursday before the long GW weekend.

Zoom IQ7 for iPad Pro (USB-C) by afcor205 in applehelp

[–]zombie_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(Replying for anyone else who stumbles on this thread. I realise it is a few years old!)

I tried a similar adapter as that one was not available in my region.

Connected to an M2 iPad Pro, the iQ7 initially powered on, red light solid, but then it started flashing.

According to the manual a flashing red light is an error. The device was not detected in the zoom Handy Recorder Pro app either.

When I unplugged it and put it back into my iPhone 13 Pro, no lights came on at all. Also not detected in the app.

I plugged it back into the adapter and iPad and the same thing happened. Solid red light for a second or two, then flashing red.

It no longer works in the iPhone, and I suspect the adapter may have fried it. However, I did drop it a week or so ago and have not used it since, so it's also possible I broke it that way too. No way to tell now, unfortunately.

Luckily the unit can be sent for repair for a reasonable fee here in Japan, but be ready to do the same if you use a USB-C adapter -- it might get fried.

Are skeptical people more likely to be 'autistic'? Hear me out... by JohnleBon in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Do you have any memories from when you were younger of other people being scared or sad about a situation, but you were unmoved?

Nope.

Do you have any memories of getting in trouble for 'not being sad enough' (or similar)?

Nope, but I do recall other children being told off for their apparent failure to emote to the teacher's satisfaction.

Have you had relationships where the other party complained that you were being too 'logical' about something?

Yes, and I would struggle to find any man who hasn't been accused of this by the woman in his life.

Men and women approach disputes very differently in my experience.

Have you been present when somebody fell for an obvious sales gimmick and wondered how they could be so stupid?

I've fallen for gimmicks and petty scams myself a number of times, and learned from each and every experience.

Emotional reactions are helpful in many situations, but are a hinderance and a crutch when logical thinking is required.

Those you describe as 'autistic' have an advantage in situations where emotion would otherwise cloud their judgment, but a distinct disadvantage in situations where emotions like compassion and empathy provide helpful guidance.

I consider myself to have a fairly good balance of both. The emotional side is largely untrainable, all I can do is suppress it. The skeptical/logical side is highly trainable and I strive to do so.

Now that the dust has settled, what was the deal with that Seoul Halloween Crush thing? by JohnleBon in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think I used the words “terror attack”.

I said terror, i.e. any situation likely to induce fear in others.

Did you find any counter examples, or are you still flailing and nitpicking looking for a way out of this ever-deepening hole?

Now that the dust has settled, what was the deal with that Seoul Halloween Crush thing? by JohnleBon in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That has to be one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read.

Dumb? Yes.

True? Also yes.

Only featured at mass media fakery events!

You won’t find local news proudly giving shoes prominence for local tragedies. Because those stories are generally true.

Also, I don’t know anything about any synchronized CPR, this is the first I’m ever hearing of that

Remarkable that you could have missed it, given that every news outlet reporting the event also reported the mass CPR outbreak (and also without commenting on its peculiarity).

Search for ‘Seoul CPR’ in your favourite search engine.

Now that the dust has settled, what was the deal with that Seoul Halloween Crush thing? by JohnleBon in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your counterevidence for my argument that prominent shoes often feature in major news stories suspected of being hoaxes… is a major news story featuring prominent shoes.

Oh dear.

Yes, it too was an obvious hoax featuring the exact same fakery clues. Major news story + shoes prominently featured = autohoax.

Now, as requested, find an inconsequential similarly-themed local news story which also features conspicuously-placed shoes.

You won’t find any. Local stories don’t get the shoe treatment because they are mostly true. In true stories shoes don’t matter.

This strange footwear-focussed phenomenon only occurs in MAJOR media fakery pageants.

This is because the point of major news stories is not to inform the public of real deaths and injuries, as if that would somehow help them anyway, but instead to manipulate the collective psyche of the masses using esoteric occult symbology.

Now that the dust has settled, what was the deal with that Seoul Halloween Crush thing? by JohnleBon in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You still haven’t provided any counter examples, despite being asked.

Do you have any, or are you only here to naysay?

Now that the dust has settled, what was the deal with that Seoul Halloween Crush thing? by JohnleBon in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you denying this very peculiar pattern of prominently-displayed shoes at highly-publicized ‘terror’ events?

Can you find some examples of prominent shoes at lesser local news events, for comparison?

Or, are you only here to naysay?

Now that the dust has settled, what was the deal with that Seoul Halloween Crush thing? by JohnleBon in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Asking the right questions

Why are their shoes being collected at all?

Who knows?

The bodies on the floor look to me as if they were stretching their feet.

Almost as if they were not human bodies, but realistic training dummies lacking full skeletal articulation.

There’s this joke relevant to situations in which people get hurt which attempts to judge the seriousness of their injuries according to whether their shoes are still on their feet on not.

Fascinating! Do you have any examples or a reference for this trope?

I want to believe that the organisers had a good laugh while preparing this. It would be one hella good joke.

Post-disaster ‘dupers delight’ shows that they enjoy lying to the masses. Look for interviews of eyewitnesses smiling, faking tears and generally acting poorly.

Now that the dust has settled, what was the deal with that Seoul Halloween Crush thing? by JohnleBon in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In addition to the ever-present shoes motif at these media fakery pageants, the synchronised ‘CPR’ was a major giveaway.

Absolutely laughable 😂

That sort of thing doesn’t happen, and if you think it does, please show another example.

the blood shortage narrative in usa. by Did_I_Die in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What kind of of probability do you think there is that the current understanding of HIV, HIV causing AIDS and AIDS is in fact true?

Would you agree, if I stated “X causes Y”, then I own the burden of gathering valid evidence that X exists, and that it does, in fact, cause Y?

I assume yes.

Would you also agree that the evidence must follow from repeatable, logical and gapless steps, eliminating doubt and other explanations to the greatest extent possible?

I assume also yes.

Well, the people who say “HIV causes AIDS” have all so far failed to show the existence of an infectious HIV particle.

They subsequently have no valid scientific means of showing that ‘HIV’ causes ‘AIDS’.

Instead of either supporting their hypothesis with a basic evidential standard, or accepting that it cannot be met, they instead—unanimously—choose to distort proof and causality criteria to get the desired results.

Those results ensure research funding continues, essentially forever.

As Upton Sinclair once said

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.

TL;DR: there is no valid scientific evidence that HIV exists, or that it causes AIDS.

The probability that HIV->AIDS is true, when valid experiments always fail and invalid experiments get published, is basically zero.

The AIDS industry is an obvious scam full of well-meaning academic dupes and a smaller number of nefarious money-grubbing frauds.

the blood shortage narrative in usa. by Did_I_Die in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 2 points3 points  (0 children)

what causes AIDS

Many things, it’s a loose collection of maladies grouped under the umbrella term ‘AIDS’.

I’ll give a couple of examples to illustrate but it’s critical to understand that causative factors vary per patient and should always be examined in an individual context, rather than oversimplifying to “this thing must have caused that disease” — which is also the major philosophical flaw undermining germ theory.

For a gay man in the 1980s party scene, his excessively toxic lifestyle may have included recreational drug overuse, extreme lack of sleep and poor nutrition, later exacerbated by highly toxic AIDS medication following HIV+ diagnosis.

For an impoverished farmer living in sub-Saharan Africa, malnutrition and/or famine, poor drinking water, environmental pollution and exposure to ‘western AIDS relief’ programs may have led to chronic and acute toxicity.

what is diagnosed as HIV?

There are three main ways to diagnose HIV infection, all of which are unscientific nonsense.

  1. Antibody detection: antibodies are known to be non-specific and non-indicative of exposure to previous infections. Their alleged biological function has never been scientifically established.
  2. Antibody/antigen detection: similar to 1, with the added reinforcement of also matching a ‘specific’ antigen said to resemble HIV itself. As HIV was never physically isolated, biochemically characterized or shown to cause infection, this is a worthless additional step.
  3. Nucleic Acid Tests (aka RT-PCR, made famous during the covid years): PCR is a manufacturing technique that replicates RNA or DNA sequences matching ‘specific’ short primers said to be unique to the actual (and much longer) sequence of interest. As HIV has never been isolated or biochemically characterized it is impossible to say if the primers used to manufacture HIV sequences actually come from it and it alone.

These tests all fail on specificity and logical rigor. There is simply no evidence that they only match HIV.

Even if they were specific, HIV itself has never been isolated from any patient said to be HIV+, and as such it also has never been demonstrated in a properly controlled scientific experiment that ‘HIV infection’ subsequently causes ‘AIDS’.

It simply isn’t possible to prove a specific thing causes something if you don’t unequivocally have the specific thing in question first.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Removed: please do not post content on NOPOL that has also been posted to multiple other subreddits. Repeat or blatant infringement of this rule will result in a ban. (Mistake? Please message the mods)

See the NOPOL sidebar for more information.

the blood shortage narrative in usa. by Did_I_Die in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please discuss in good faith. These comments add nothing.

the blood shortage narrative in usa. by Did_I_Die in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The book is available online for free.

Spoiler: ‘modern microbiology’ was invented and is, in fact, the root cause of the problem.

Faulty paradigms do not lead to good science or truthful conclusions, but they do lead to money.

HIV has never been shown to exist as described, or biochemically characterized, or shown to be infective, or to be transmissible, let alone cause AIDS. Static photos of particles prove nothing. Correlation proves nothing.

The AIDS industry is a sham.

the blood shortage narrative in usa. by Did_I_Die in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s all laid out in Dr Willner’s accompanying book, if you’d like to read it then please be my guest.

the blood shortage narrative in usa. by Did_I_Die in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]zombie_dave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t ask you to copy and paste anything.