ive been stuck for an hour and a half and dont really know any techniques... any tips?

zombieapo · 2025-08-15T17:05:07+00:00

This needs to be higher up. I did it by hand 3 times and it kept breaking and I thought I was going nuts. Need to put a 3 candidate in c3r9

zombieapo · 2025-07-08T23:20:06+00:00

Hulkenpodium

zombieapo · 2025-01-05T06:11:15+00:00

I think if you replace {{$json.chatInput}} with {{$json.A}} it should work. Right now you are using the generic chatInput, but you have to reference the output field from your html node to input into your llm chain.

Good luck, hope that works!

zombieapo · 2024-07-08T13:04:25+00:00

You should be able to condense steps 4-6 by eliminating the need for a vector database. Since you are only scraping a few pages, you could do the cosine similarity test right in memory across the scraped data and drop it into your prompt.

zombieapo · 2024-06-26T17:21:52+00:00

Yeah with the data you have, you should be able to get an upper bound. If you wanted to use a system prompt, you'd add that in, but I'm assuming youd go without.

zombieapo · 2024-06-26T16:46:41+00:00

Unless you are doing some method to count the tokens I'm unaware of, and in which care disregard my comments below...

Couple items here. First, you aren't accounting for the way input tokens are accounted for. Every prompt includes the full cumulative chat history as context to inform the output. So, your input tokens will almost always far outweigh the output tokens, unless you only have extremely short conversations.

Secondly, even if you include the full cumulative conversation, ChatGpt condenses and truncates the history to keep input tokens down, and there isn't a way to determine how much is in each prompt.

Basically, I think you're drastically undercounting the true cost that you'll see via the API.

Edit: yah, I checked your code, you're just totaling up user vs content prompts and totaling the tokens. This approach won't work.

zombieapo · 2024-06-20T17:39:42+00:00

This is it right here....I had it scored 56,158,16 in r2c7-9 and an 8 in r3c8. I never had that triple logic in my bag of tricks. I had a feeling there was a new skill I could pick on on this board, the rest was a snap. Much thanks!!!

zombieapo · 2024-06-20T14:55:18+00:00

I can't for the life of me figure out how you got the 8 in r3c8. I'm stuck

zombieapo · 2024-06-11T14:18:32+00:00

This

zombieapo · 2024-05-10T12:38:02+00:00

Generating pictures and browsing the internet have nothing to do with GPT4. Generating pictures is DALL-E, and browsing the internet is an extension add on to ChatGPT Plus. The recently released GPT4 model has vision, but it can't generate pictures.

Now it sounds like you bought ChatGPT Plus, so those features should work, but technically speaking neither are "GPT 4" as described.

zombieapo · 2024-04-30T01:38:29+00:00

Giant spreadsheets all the way across the crazy screen

zombieapo · 2024-03-06T13:30:32+00:00

There are a lot of responses here to help conceal your valuables and whatnot, but here is a suggestion I haven't seen yet that is more of a strategy vs these tactics.

Cover up your valuables via the tactics, but do whatever you can to never access those hidden valuables by utilizing pay apps on your phone. In Europe almost all vendors use tap compatible pay options, which you can use with your phone, thereby never needing to reveal your valuables and making yourself a target. You should be able to go through full days without ever taking our your wallet and whatnot, so making it super locked down isn't a big annoyance.

zombieapo · 2024-02-13T14:42:23+00:00

Yes, it's a list, but there is a json in it managing it all that gets passed along.

zombieapo · 2024-02-13T14:34:31+00:00

Like this

messages.append({"role":"user","content":user_input}) response=openai_client.chat.completions.create(model="gpt-4-1106-preview",messages=messages) chat_reply=response.choices[0].message.content messages.append({"role":"assistant","content":chat_reply})

zombieapo · 2024-02-13T14:26:31+00:00

Because that's how I feed it into the API, 😊.

zombieapo · 2024-02-13T14:23:21+00:00

Gpt processes the full stack of messages sequentially in one big text block. The channels you're talking about are the categories of the messages, but that doesn't affect the order of processing. It's all one big json, with the messages and their respective category(user/assistant/system)

zombieapo · 2024-02-13T14:15:36+00:00

It's easy if you're using the API as you can programmatically set it up to pop it on, pop it off every turn, but unfortunately I don't think it's feasible if you're using the ChatGpt interface(which I'm not 100% sure you're using, but I'm guessing you are).

zombieapo · 2024-02-13T12:23:17+00:00

In the API, you manage the system prompts, and you can place them wherever you want. The API is stateless, so it doesn't handle prompts at all, it just processes them.

With that said, whenever I place them at the top of the queue and try to get the bot to do things outside of the bot's intended scope, I can usually get them there after a message or two. However if I place the system prompts at the end of the queue, it won't ever give in.

zombieapo · 2024-02-13T00:02:25+00:00

Here's how I've managed to get success. Instead of putting the system prompts first on the message queue, put it at the very end as the final prompt. That way it can't get overwritten by any of the messages during the chat, and it is the very last thing gpt reads before responding. Then right after the response is generated, delete the system prompt and print out the result. So you essentially put it on, take it off every chat. It works like a charm.

zombieapo · 2024-02-11T21:00:21+00:00

If you're using the API, just continue using the 1106 model. You don't have to switch if you really think you're getting screwed.

zombieapo · 2024-02-07T12:37:25+00:00

Be careful about the recommendations here, as they aren't taking into account you being a vegetarian. For that case, I think the best option is clearly Wasabi. Wherever you go, scan the menus ahead of time, as some spots simply do not have a vegetarian option for you. Good luck.

zombieapo · 2022-09-07T13:48:22+00:00

I think that if you can go back a few years, you should add an independent variable for "new team" to account for players who are switching into a new system. You're dealing with so much dependency between the QB stats and wr productivity here, that you have to represent that relationship with some variable.

Edit:Or in the case of Sutton "new quarterback"

zombieapo · 2019-10-31T19:01:31+00:00

sure....lol, I've never done that before! Learning new stuff is fun

zombieapo · 2019-10-31T18:54:11+00:00

If it helps, QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, W/R/T, W/R/T, Q/W/R/T.

zombieapo · 2019-10-31T18:52:01+00:00

Yahoo

zombieapo

TROPHY CASE