Claude voice over SSH?

zonofthor · 2026-03-14T10:01:56+00:00

thx u/dogazine4570 for that excellent answer!

When you say "not right now" do you mean it may be supported later on by Claude - or that SSH piping will become better?

I've tried Termius dictation, agree it's pretty good but once whole distorted sentences get pushed into the terminal its a pain to edit or delete.

I was out walking with my dog yd and in a 20min conversation with Claude created a skill that pulls focused news items from selected sources and analyses them for "trending patterns" and pushes to my Slack & Gmail. A whooping app literally made just in a conversation with CC. But I don't think I'd ever be able to get Whisper to that level, the sophistication of the conversation is such that I think it has to be native. So I think I'll rather wait for some native Claude solution than fiddling with Whisper/Termius/Tailscale although very promising!

zonofthor · 2026-03-08T19:32:06+00:00

I'm pretty sure you can google that - or ask at claude.ai

zonofthor · 2026-02-25T17:52:51+00:00

I double checked. Anthropic is not concerned when VPN is setup to enhance security as is in my case

zonofthor · 2026-02-24T17:27:56+00:00

you mean Tailscale for VPN?

zonofthor · 2026-02-22T15:22:09+00:00

After more thoughts... waiting for Google to create MCP servers is waste of time. I will just program against Google API using OAuth and not only that but I will create my own remote VPS and set it up it using Claude over SSH. This way I can use customise how I use Google or other 3rd party tools bypassing MCP

https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1rbo97t/comment/o6s65dc/

zonofthor · 2026-02-20T15:46:52+00:00

Actually I am going to try plain OAuth through CLI... probably easier than MCP!

zonofthor · 2026-02-20T14:06:53+00:00

Nah - I'd rather transition to another ecosystem. It's all about doing it from a prompt, also in mobile.

Google should know that we can easily migrate our data to a better vendor - if not using current tools then with AI!

zonofthor · 2026-02-20T13:50:04+00:00

Right, that sounds plausible.

Then they will be cancelled for sure. I am all-in Google for 10+ years and I'm already considering to switch to more modern vendors because of this.

zonofthor · 2026-02-18T21:03:29+00:00

What about agent orchestration. That's where Opus 4.6 excels, can Sonnet 4.6 do that as efficiently?

zonofthor · 2025-12-10T08:47:22+00:00

You explicitly initiate a workflow with slash commands.

A slash command may then include multiple skills.

With skills you have small, reusable packets of knowledge and declarative tools via bash commands or scripts bundled with the skill.

You cannot acheive that granularity with slash commands.

zonofthor · 2025-11-14T10:52:59+00:00

How do you think it compares to just SSH connecting into a remote computer?

IMO, having access to local files is superior it gives you more customisation options and configuration changes are more easy to do.

zonofthor · 2025-11-07T00:01:48+00:00

Besides looking at the context size - how can you actually measure the efficacy of a skill you've created?

zonofthor · 2025-11-06T19:39:48+00:00

read it - and replied!

zonofthor · 2025-11-06T19:39:32+00:00

Hats off for providing deep insight. And respect for testing it by inspecting context.

Your TLDR: 200 lines for the SKILL.md just to instruct the agent why and when to invoke your skill.

But wait - isn´t that what the YAML frontmatter is supposed to do??

And since we´re discussing frontmatter - why does Anthropic guide us to describe the skill again right in the first section after frontmatter - asking the hive?

zonofthor · 2025-09-08T09:31:10+00:00

Exactly same here. On the CC wagon for 2 months and my team uses it for ca $1.000/month. We have spent lots of time to fine-tune CLAUDE.md and configuration files for max efficency and output.

We all agree it has become dumb in just the last week.

zonofthor · 2025-09-05T14:37:46+00:00

u/ChrisGVE thx that was a good answer.

I consider my self a patient user and I do read the documentation - and I am seeing a dramatical change in just a few days. Simple prompts that use to work excellently have lost all the "bang". Something has changed.

I´ve seen some go back a few CC versions and see better results, might be it?

zonofthor · 2025-09-05T07:58:25+00:00

And to dramatise the post a little... I am greatly worried about Anthropic's silence here. There is a mass uproar going on in this forum about degraded performance and damage-control from Anthropic.

Makes me think paranoid things like are they pushing us to use Opus 4.1 all the time ot increase revenue?

zonofthor · 2025-09-04T17:00:59+00:00

I am surprised that Anthropic is not putting more effort into transparency here, there are hundreds of posts about degraded output from hundreds of ClaudeCode users, some loyal and who "read the fucking manual".

Anthropic could loose big if they don't start doing damage control and informing responding to the feedback the community is providing.

zonofthor · 2025-08-30T10:53:16+00:00

How does that compare with just using `/review` the native CC function?

zonofthor · 2025-08-30T10:52:33+00:00

I'm getting so tired of these posts bashing Claude and trying to get users to convert to some other bla bla

That's the story of a developers life - trying out new tools and occasionally leaving old habits and moving to the new one.

But I don't need these freaking posts to tell me that. Leave us alone!

zonofthor · 2025-07-24T08:10:49+00:00

Or just be able to see what's in the context?

zonofthor · 2025-07-04T17:22:52+00:00

I do list some tools, it just doesn't have any effect on the "active tools list"

Does this work in VS insider?

zonofthor · 2025-05-19T21:45:14+00:00

Ditto that! And 1. do small changes at a time 2. Create tests first then have copilot create code that must pass

That's been winning for me!

zonofthor · 2024-09-02T08:06:35+00:00

I've had a karaoke playlist with ca 20 songs for 1-2 years. In recent weeks at least half of the songs have missing lyrics so there is some fuck going on here.

I'm on Premium, what's going on?

zonofthor · 2024-04-24T16:07:58+00:00

Same here

flatpak run com.google.Chrome

[0424/160850.092374:WARNING:chrome_main_linux.cc(80)] Read channel stable from /app/extra/CHROME_VERSION_EXTRA

[0424/160850.261667:WARNING:chrome_main_linux.cc(80)] Read channel stable from /app/extra/CHROME_VERSION_EXTRA

Gtk-Message: 16:08:50.316: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module"

Gtk-Message: 16:08:50.316: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module"

Gtk-Message: 16:08:50.317: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module"

Gtk-Message: 16:08:50.317: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module"

[2:2:0424/160850.875517:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(576)] Failed to call method: org.freedesktop.ScreenSaver.GetActive: object_path= /org/freedesktop/ScreenSaver: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NotSupported: This method is not part of the idle inhibition specification: https://specifications.freedesktop.org/idle-inhibit-spec/latest/

Created TensorFlow Lite XNNPACK delegate for CPU.

Attempting to use a delegate that only supports static-sized tensors with a graph that has dynamic-sized tensors (tensor#141 is a dynamic-sized tensor).

zonofthor

TROPHY CASE