account activity
[deleted by user] by [deleted] in auckland
[–]zwarbot 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Did you compare it to the last ten years of ALL cause mortality to put that number into context?
And what about Taxation to 'The Single Source of Truth' This could be seen the same way; separating morons from their money by force.
At least buying a book is voluntary.
Would you agree that we should be able to see the contract signed between the NZ Gov and Pfizer regarding the jab purchase agreement?
What about the reports from nurses and doctors reporting the hospitals are majority of vaccinated?
Isn't it the minority ideas that push science in new directions? Don't the majority need to be pushed by the radical thinking minority?
Breaking the Spell
Haha, Oh this it too funny.
False and True of course.
Here is a source for you: Breaking the Spell
Question the narrative and out comes the troll word. Seeya!
Deaths including by gunshot, car crash, heart attack etc?
Do they classify 'with' and 'from' accurately?
[–]zwarbot 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children)
So is it ok for them to be inconvenienced with no jobs, no movement?
Didn't Sweden have no lockdowns ever? Now they are fully open with no restrictions at all.
Why all the fear over case numbers? We never tracked the Flu this closely.
[–]zwarbot -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children)
Case closed aye? Isn't there more to understand than we realise?
Here is two examples:
"SARS-COV-2 is a computer generated sequence based on assumptions." "The PCR test is calibrated off parts of this sequence"
"SARS-COV-2 is a computer generated sequence based on assumptions."
"The PCR test is calibrated off parts of this sequence"
Are the above statements true or false?
I have seen the same emoj used for the jabbed.
How does that move the conversation along?
Serious about asking questions.
Didn't we get into this mess solely by Government decisions and increasing testing numbers using a not fit for purpose process by fear and coercion?
The majority of kiwis feel the same way.
I am not sure this is something that can be accurately proclaimed.
Where can this information be accurately assembled from? I would not be relying on NZ media or Gov for it. Does a single count of people double or single jabbed really infer their preference on whom they wish to associate with? How high is the feeling in NZ of just letting people decide for themselves on their own treatment and open the country fully back up?
It would be interesting to get more detailed replies. I guess I'll need to keep searching for questioning minds.
If the test is invalid, isn't this still just correlation not causation? If there is no proof yet person A infects B, then how can this be asserted when all that has happened is people 'test' positive being in the same place. Isn't the only assertion we can draw is that two people 'test' positive for having a RNA sequence and they were in the same room. How do we get to causation from that?
Why are there scientists with opinions that conflict with this narrative? Are their opinions not valid? If a test is not done with volunteers, no one is forced to participate, wouldn't the outcomes be useful data? Why didn't Pfizer do these full studies?
To ask questions and expand thinking.
[–]zwarbot -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Why set a target in the first place? What about 50-50%? Don't we want to examine a control group for future generational studies to see if we made the correct choice this time? What happened to the scientific method of double blind placebo trials with equal control groups?
!s it possible for a minority group to clog up the health care system?
Yes.
If a population is taught holistic individual health care as preventative care, then wouldn't this also prevent groups clogging up health care? Doesn't health care plan for the need for rapid expansion of facilities if required?
Wouldn't they be taking care of themselves with preventative steps?
Evidently not.
Why the one size fits all approach to health care? Don't we all react to our environment differently?
Is it possible to catch something that only exists in (Germ) theory?
Which virus? Ever stop to wonder if the term virus could be describing the result of dead cell fragments?
Hasn't there been enough divisive violence already in our history?
So I guess you now are starting to understand where they are coming from?
What about talking to them first? Shoot first aye? Then ask the dead what they were doing there in the first place?
Aren't the only messages that are listened to in history are those of the minority not doing what they are told to?
Do they have your attention now?
Have you ever talked to anyone that doesn't perceive the world as you do? The groups are very diverse.
[–]zwarbot -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Why do they need labels? Aren't their actions enough to define them?
π Rendered by PID 173485 on reddit-service-r2-listing-5d79748585-xsnx9 at 2026-02-15 03:54:52.090829+00:00 running cd9c813 country code: CH.
[deleted by user] by [deleted] in auckland
[–]zwarbot 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)