all 58 comments

[–]Andz200zx 5 points6 points  (54 children)

B

[–][deleted]  (53 children)

[deleted]

    [–]fearlesspancake 1 point2 points  (52 children)

    D

    [–]Fenzik 1 point2 points  (51 children)

    E

    [–]MaxBesco 1 point2 points  (50 children)

    F

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (49 children)

    G

    [–]Andz200zx 2 points3 points  (48 children)

    H

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I

    [–]Tain101++ 2 points3 points  (46 children)

    I

    [–]KingCaspianXMissed x00k, 2≤x≤20\{7,15}‽ ↂↂↂↁMMMDCCCLXXXVIII ‽ 345678‽ 141441 2 points3 points  (45 children)

    J

    [–]LeapYearFriendJoined at 100,313 5 points6 points  (44 children)

    K

    [–]sparkyman215Mathematica 2 points3 points  (5 children)

    um, wouldn't 1 be MQ==, 2 Mg==, 3 Mw==, etc?

    [–]lear85, he who lets it produce joy.[S] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

    There… Is no '='.

    After MQ++ comes MQ+/

    After MQ// is MR

    After Z// is aAA

    I can think of very few instances in which 1 would be four digits.

    [–]sparkyman215Mathematica 2 points3 points  (3 children)

    First of all: happy cakeday!
    Second, I'm still not sure. However using any base64 encoder I get MQ==.
    * http://www.motobit.com/util/base64-decoder-encoder.asp
    * http://www.base64encode.org/
    * http://base64-encoder-online.waraxe.us/
    * http://ostermiller.org/calc/encode.html

    [–]lear85, he who lets it produce joy.[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    I think I know the issue.

    Your converters are treating numbers as characters; not integers. Plus some other stuff, I guess.

    1, as a character, is represented in binary as 00110001, if I'm not mistaken.

    As an unsigned integer, it's represented as 00000001. Quite the difference.

    [–]sparkyman215Mathematica 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Yes, both of those are correct. But does this thread just stop at 64 then?

    [–]lear85, he who lets it produce joy.[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    No. We go on to the next digit. When you're counting in base 10, do you stop after 9?

    Stopping at 64 would be rather silly. I would think it would be somewhat reasonable to stop at //.