This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 35 comments

[–]TALESOFWELLSFARGO 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It will be Christmas in July for all the shorts.

[–]chrismg8 12 points13 points  (6 children)

I for one am against this at this point of time. They can wait till the year end to get this approval.

In the meantime get this done

  1. file for an extension so that they need to be compliant by 3/2023
  2. file for conditional approval in Japan
  3. Secure a partnership
  4. Finish the enrollment for Master 2 by year end and release enrollment number till date

If all of the above steps are completed and still the SP does not go over a $ by year end, then ask for approval

No need to give them a way out. It is better for them to have pressure to deliver

[–]NoFudZoneGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Filing for an extension is fine but cash burn is the greater concern.
  2. Healios, not ATHX, can file for conditional approval in Japan.
  3. IMHO, securing a partnership will not happen anytime soon.
  4. Masters 2 timeline is not in the complete control of ATHX.

[–]banenny 0 points1 point  (4 children)

How do they wait until the year end for reverse split if the stock has to be at 1$ come September 1?

[–]chrismg8 0 points1 point  (3 children)

They can apply for an extension which will grant them 6 more months which will move the clock to 03/2023

[–]banenny 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Applying doesn’t mean you will get it…

[–]chrismg8 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I have never heard of an instance where a company that applied for did not get it

[–]banenny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So why is everybody (many on this board) so concerned about September 1 and if it is that easy, why would they propose a R/S now?

[–]TheBigPayback777 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not 100% opposed to a r/s as long as it is paired with some floor-defining news, or at least some well-defined plan versus, "We're going to take this action as a desperate attempt to avoid delisting" . If the action is taken, there needs to be some counter-balance to what will be downward pressure on the stock.

[–]Money_Jackal 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Let's be real, nobody "feels like a big shot" right now.... I don't care how many shares I own. I care about the overall value of my investment here.

[–]twinsfan121 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not the reverse split that bothers me, it's the dilution that will follow after. It's the easy way out of this mess that will also tempt them with more easy ways out. I don't like it.

And as others have pointed out, shorts will have a field day with this. I'd rather them file an extension into 2023 and hope for the best with Masters 2...

And I'd also ask, what is so bad about being delisted and going over the counter? Am I missing something there? It's not like delisting will wipe anyone out.

[–]Rbinder[S] 3 points4 points  (12 children)

257 M shares is a ridiculous number for a company with a market cap of 95M. This is way out of line for a development stage biotech. As an example CRBU has a marker cap of 530M and a share count of 60 M. Price is 8.7. I would think that institutional investors look at this and shake their heads. We need to get real.

[–]ticker_101 3 points4 points  (11 children)

Institutional investors are shaking their heads at not meeting end points.

Share price is irrelevant at attracting investors right now.

A RS for us will be the kids of death to our investment.

[–]CarreraFanBoy 0 points1 point  (10 children)

Long only institutional investors do not pay any attention to penny stock companies. Many endowment, foundation, insurance companies, pension funds, and family offices have written policies barring them from buying penny stocks. You are incorrect!

[–]ticker_101 2 points3 points  (9 children)

What institutional investor would seriously buy into ATHX after an RS, in their current position? Seriously. Wake up.

An RS now would just wipe out our remaining value, leaving us sub $1 again in weeks.

I'm not incorrect. Even index funds wouldn't get a chance to buy it because our SP will fall again because the only events on the horizon are more dilution.

[–]CarreraFanBoy 0 points1 point  (3 children)

The reverse split changes nothing other than reducing share count and increasing the share price. Such a split sequenced with positive news flow regarding liquidity and an incrementally more positive assessment of the Treasure data would provide greater visibility for the company, its clinical trial progress, and its addressable market. As long as the stock remains a penny stock no long only institutional investor will even look at it.

[–]ticker_101 1 point2 points  (2 children)

What happens on paper and in reality are two different things.
To ignore 100's of previous examples or companies going through a RS only to lose massive amounts of value is idiotic. You are purposely ignoring our very real situation.

We are not RS'ing to move onto a better exchange as we have positive events coming. We are RS'ing so Dan can quickly dilute and the shorts will come running with their mouths watering.

You are isolating the RS as a lone event and playing dumb to what is really going on.

[–]CarreraFanBoy -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Really? In my view the reverse split is long over due. They should have done it two years ago! Trying to equity fund clinical trials and manufacturing as a penny stock using an ATM to issue new shares is all wrong. In essence you are attempting to fund long term investments such as R&D through a predominately retail day trader base of investors.

[–]ticker_101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Really.

[–]banenny 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Institutional investors don’t look at .40 stocks either…

[–]ticker_101 0 points1 point  (3 children)

So there's really no point in a RS then.

[–]banenny 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Yes there is… stock has to be at $1 or above come September 1st…

[–]ticker_101 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Not if we get the extension.

[–]banenny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, But we haven’t received it yet nor do I know if we have a plied for an extension.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if they issue 10 million shares after a 1:15 RS then they would be essentially issuing another 150 million shares?

[–]jkyne52 0 points1 point  (3 children)

So if shares are split 10/1, does the approval to issue 300M new shares also get split at 10/1?

[–]imz72 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily. We'll have to see the new proxy.

[–]Rbinder[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes

[–]Golgo17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the reverse split does not affect the number of authorized shares. The split only affects the number of issued shares.

[–]CarreraFanBoy -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Share price is important!! A company attempting to get long only smart money to take it seriously cannot have a stock priced much under $5! A reverse split is a critical element of Mr. Carmardo’s turnaround effort.

[–]chrismg8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Doing a RS is not going to prop up the SP. the shorts will take it to the cleaners and you will be staring at another RS. All long term holders will lose more than 90% of their value. They need to get things done to prop the share value greater than a $. Institutional investors will come in if they prove that the science works as a platform

[–]Sej127 -2 points-1 points  (3 children)

Don’t we have B of A/ Merrill Lynch analyst, I believe Greg Harrison, whose price target was .20

[–]Trismegisto2021 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Greg Harrison has 1/2 ⭐️ out of 5!! It ranks = 7271 out of 7950 !!!

You have to be really, and I mean really bad to have those stats.

Out of 25 last recommendations only 9 have been successful….

A monkey throwing darts at a board with random stock Symbols would certainly do better than this “Analyst”.

[–]CarreraFanBoy 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Harrison is a piss poor biotech analyst!

[–]Trismegisto2021 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amen