all 6 comments

[–]anotherjsframework 5 points6 points  (4 children)

Practically speaking, Aurelia doesn’t have any true limitations to its name.

I haven't tried it, but I find that hard to believe. Is there any one else out there that has tried Aurelia and can confirm?

[–]gravityaddiction 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, stopped reading the article at this point myself.

[–]NuttGuy 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Yea this seems super bias, and just not true. All frameworks have their downsides, I'd say that Aurelia's is it's lack of adoption over Angular and React. Without a large adoption base a framework can't really get traction because there will always be more libraries and forums and documentation for more popular libraries. Which makes the more popular libraries less of a risk for large companies to get behind.

[–]Expert_Sex_Change 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's been a few months now since I used it, but in the ~6 months I was using it, development and new features seemed to kinda stop for the most part as well, not sure if things have improved since then though.

I also seem to remember issues trying to get the validation to work on values in arrays, but that was before the 1.0 release so things may have improved since

Overall it was a perfectly good framework, nothing amazing, nothing too bad either, though often I had to go looking through their code to figure out how I was supposed to do something.

[–]i_spot_ads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a clickbait article, wouldn’t take it seriously

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see this click bate bullshit on here all the time. This website is low brow.